D•Scribe
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml to politics @lemmy.world ·
edit-2
11 个月前

J.D. Vance Lashes Out After the Smallest Fact-Check in V.P. Debate

newrepublic.com

external-link
message-square
111
link
fedilink
564
external-link

J.D. Vance Lashes Out After the Smallest Fact-Check in V.P. Debate

newrepublic.com

usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml to politics @lemmy.world ·
edit-2
11 个月前
message-square
111
link
fedilink
J.D. Vance grew agitated after a mild fact-check on his comments about immigrants in Springfield, Ohio.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • resin85@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    256
    ·
    11 个月前

    • ℕ𝕠𝕓𝕠𝕕𝕪 𝕆𝕗𝕗𝕚𝕔𝕚𝕒𝕝@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      11 个月前

    • Ulrich_the_Old@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      11 个月前

      The rules were ALSO that you were not going to lie…

      • smeenz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 个月前

        They lied about that rule.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 个月前

      No, just no.

      So I didn’t see this, yet, but please tell me that this image doesn’t contain a verbatim quote of how this went down. This would be insanity

      • DrDominate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        ·
        edit-2
        11 个月前

        “Th-the rules were that you guys weren’t going to fact-check me, and since you’re fact-checking me, I think it’s important to say what’s actually going on,” Vance said.”

        Unfortunately it’s true.

      • ResoluteCatnap@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        11 个月前

        See for yourself

        https://youtu.be/4Dc83ClqMZM

    • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.deBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 个月前

      That’s when I turned it off.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 个月前

      When they complain about being fact checked and that not fact checking them was a prerequisite for them to attend the debate, that tells you everything about what they stand for.

  • Myxomatosis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    145
    ·
    11 个月前

    Fascists are easily startled but they’ll soon be back. And in greater numbers.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      11 个月前

      Lol I’m loving all the star wars references tonight.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    11 个月前

    The idea that these putzes whine about being fact-checked. This is where we are at.

    And this from the bunch that wear shirts that say things like “fuck your feelings” and “facts don’t care about your feelings”. Then they melt the very second a fact shows up to negate their feelings about their fictions.

  • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    11 个月前

    Actually amazing. How is this the timeline we’re in

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    11 个月前

    “You told me I could tell lies unchecked!”

  • arin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    11 个月前

    Snowflake

  • Kalysta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    11 个月前

    And this melting snowflake may actually be our next vice president.

    I like my VPs able to take criticism

    • smeenz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      11 个月前

      Given Donny’s general health, this melting snowflake may well be your next president

  • Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    11 个月前

    A candidate being mad at a fact check is a massive red flag

    • ResoluteCatnap@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 个月前

      It’s a massive red flag but one the right won’t see. Just look at Fox-Legally-Classified-As-Entertainment’s clip on the fact checking, and read the comments. They took this as a sign of bias and think JD Vance won the exchange. The fact that JD Vance spelled out the legal process for them to not be illegal immigrants (iow he was lying) is lost on them.

      I hope at least some people realize the gaslighting going on both from trump/vance as well as the media.

      • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 个月前

        deleted by creator

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 个月前

    Looks like the source changed the headline on you:

    “J.D. Vance Lashes Out After the Smallest Fact-Check in V.P. Debate”

    If you could update yours, that would be great!

    • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 个月前

      It has been updated now

      • smeenz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 个月前

        What was it originally?

        • silence7@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 个月前

          An archived copy shows

          J.D. Vance Freaks Out Over the Slightest Pushback in V.P. Debate

  • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 个月前

  • chemicalprophet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 个月前

    Ignorant, lying, coward. Also the way his body shape is leaning: cow-ward

    • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 个月前

      trump stance, maybe he’s wearing trump lifts?

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 个月前

    kind of expected since hes a orangian snd part of that cowards troop

  • YeetPics@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 个月前

    It’s because (like all authoritarian dildos) he has an ego larger than he deserves and can’t look inward for anything.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 个月前

    I think the reports of Vance having “won” are greatly overstated:

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/mollybohannon/2024/10/02/tim-walz-jd-vance-polls-both-candidates-favorability-increases-post-debate/

    42% vs. 41%? That’s well within the margin of error, LOL.

    • ccdfa@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 个月前

      What are your numbers supposed to mean? From your article:

      Prior to the debate, a New York Times/Siena College poll released Sept. 28 found Midwestern voters prefer Walz to Vance: Walz was viewed favorably by 44% of voters and unfavorably by 41%, while Vance was viewed favorably by 42% of voters and unfavorably by 48%.

      So 44% like Walz, 42% like Vance. 41% dislike Walz, 48% dislike Vance. Comparing 42 and 41 is comparing two different things

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 个月前

        42%. That’s how many debate viewers in the CBS poll thought Vance was the winner of the debate, compared to 41% who thought Walz won. Seventeen percent of viewers said the debate ended in a tie.

  • carl_dungeon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 个月前

    That’s some serious small dick energy

politics @lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@lemmy.world

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.2K users / day
  • 6.06K users / week
  • 10.7K users / month
  • 28.2K users / 6 months
  • 7 local subscribers
  • 25.4K subscribers
  • 15K Posts
  • 289K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
  • aidan@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
  • JuBe@lemmy.world
  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
  • UI: unknown version
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org