D•Scribe
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
alphanerd4@lemmy.world to US Authoritarianism@lemmy.world · 8 months ago

A Monopoly on Violence

lemmy.world

message-square
77
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • politicalmemes@lemmy.world
303

A Monopoly on Violence

lemmy.world

alphanerd4@lemmy.world to US Authoritarianism@lemmy.world · 8 months ago
message-square
77
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • politicalmemes@lemmy.world
  • Codex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    https://priceonomics.com/how-police-officers-seize-cash-from-innocent/

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/the-supreme-court-rules-that-cops-can-steal-your-stuff-as-they-always-have/ar-BB1magie

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/08/18/civil-asset-forfeiture-explained/74802279007/

    Those are just the top 3 search results for “cops steal money”.

    • mholiv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      People should still be punished for driving dangerously. Civil forfeiture is another issue.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        8 months ago

        Feel free to point out in the meme where the driver was driving dangerously.

        • mholiv@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          39
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          The same place it says it’s for civil forfeiture. This being said the police officer does have a ticket in hand which implies some sort of safety violation.

          This comic could be taking place in China. The same scene could play out. Nothing specific to injustice in the USA here.

          • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Bootlicker.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Sandra_Bland

          • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            8 months ago

            expired registration is not a safety issue

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              If your state doesn’t do safety inspections that’s something you should talk with a state legislator about.

              • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                8 months ago

                they officially are done, but only in the major citys and people living pretty much everywhere else is given exceptions. Safety inspections seem like a weird idea anyway, how does the government know what is safe for my usag of the vehicle. Is a lack of coolant a safety issue? What about a missing bumper? A half rotted frame?

                • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Yes, those all seem like safety issues to me.

                  https://www.legislature.mi.gov/Laws/MCL?objectName=mcl-300-1949-VI-EQUIPMENT

                  Is this your first time encountering the notion that vehicle safety is regulated by the government?

                  • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    For most people yes. My perspective is that I really don’t want government inspecting every car on the road because those kinds of issues aren’t a meaningful part of the risk I undertake on the road which is dominated almost entirely by incompetence, failure to follow traffic laws, old people who shouldn’t be driving anymore, and morons using their phones while driving.

                    Perfect performance thus isn’t meaningfully expected to improve my safety but it will cost me money.

                • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  The government doesn’t know what’s safe but it can certainly know what is UNsafe.

                  It’s insanity that your government allows 2 ton death machines to race around in public without safety inspections.

                  • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    The U.S. Government Accountability Office found the safety benefit too small to quantify that it exists.

            • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Nope. Regulatory.

          • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            32
            ·
            8 months ago

            You’d lick the boot in China too, but nice try.

            • mholiv@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              If I was driving dangerously it would only be just that I be punished proportionately. Same goes for everyone in every country.

              If you call that boot licking so be it.

              • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                12
                ·
                8 months ago

                Who

                Is

                Driving

                Dangerously?

                Assumptions in your head don’t count anymore than anything else in there.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      And yet this meme is clearly about traffic enforcement.

      • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        First you have to stops the cars to gets the money.

        I’m sure the Ferengi could have said it better.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          If you can help us get rid of cars then great. Otherwise, yes we need some kind of accountability on people driving several tons of metal at insane speeds.

          • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            If only we had that, rather than revenue generation…

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              I don’t care if the small town gets paid because commuters can’t get off the gas pedal. If it keeps me out of the hospital from some asshole merging into a traffic jam at 80 mph then I’m all for it.

              • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                And when some asshole merges in front of you going 30mph when traffic is going 60-70 and there’s no way you can avoid it, so you bounce off him into someone else and it ends up being a 5-car pileup, it’s ok because at least he wasn’t speeding.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Is the speed limit on the road 30? No? Then that’s not what we’re talking about in the Authoritarianism community today. For the record going so far below the speed limit that you become a hazard isn’t okay either and is accounted for in all 50 states’ traffic laws. If you want to be mad about driving habits though this isn’t the place. The roads we’re talking about are frequently signed for 55 with most people doing 55.

    • Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Well yeah. If you search for a topic, the top results should be relevant. That’s how searching is supposed to work.

US Authoritarianism@lemmy.world

usauthoritarianism@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !usauthoritarianism@lemmy.world

ChonkyOwlbear is an Illegitimate Usurper

There’s other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: !thepoliceproblem@lemmy.world

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 17 users / day
  • 655 users / week
  • 1.16K users / month
  • 6.32K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 1.19K subscribers
  • 394 Posts
  • 6.5K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
  • UI: unknown version
  • BE: 0.19.9
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org