Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)M
Posts
0
Comments
408
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Fair. It’s not just that one though. I notice a lot of weird things there.

  • But I responded to a comment cursing out systemd on a post about system V being dropped?

    The comparison is as made because the comment brought up systemd on a post about system V.

  • Why post this ai generated content? Since when does the docker logo have the Cassandra eye in it?

  • Yah! Screw them 20 line unit files. We roll with 500 line bash scripts.

    /sarcasm

  • Do - do you like the 5000k bulbs? Do people consider cool white lighting to be modern?

  • I mean yah? That’s obviously true. That’s why I said it was close to actual anti semitism. Not bona fide antisemitism.

  • This is weirdly close to actual anti semitism. Israel is a genocidal state, reasonable people can agree, but there being a secret plan to control the world reaks of something more dog whistle-ish.

  • It’s even crazier than that. It’s not even the electrons at the “leading edge” it’s the EM field they create even separate the of the wires that actually contain the electrons.

    https://youtu.be/bHIhgxav9LY

    And the follow-up with a physical experiment after the first video started a huge drama.

    https://youtu.be/oI_X2cMHNe0

  • Small clarification. Apple Pay is not really paying with your phone bill. I think you can but most users just have their credit card or debit card linked.

  • But that section clearly supports my claim? All that section says is that there must not be anything that casts doubt on the integrity of the containment zone.

    Given that logically you can’t logically prove a negative this seems like the strongest sound phrasing of the validity.

    Section 23 para. 5 no. 5 StandAG, preservation of the barrier effect:There must not be any available findings or data that cast doubt on the integrity of the effective containment zone, in particular on compliance with the geoscientific minimum requirements for hydraulic conductivity of the rock, thickness and expanse of the effec- tive containment zone over a period of one million years.

    • Where there is clear evidence or data that the preservation of the barrier effect appears doubtful, the minimum requirement was considered not to have been satisfied. This minimum requirement is considered satisfied in all other cases, until such time as relevant data becomes available.

    Again this supports my claim:

    There must not be any available findings or data that cast doubt on the integrity of the effective containment zone

    You can’t prove a negative thus the strongest approach that could be taken is:

    Where there is clear evidence or data that the preservation of the barrier effect appears doubtful, the minimum requirement was considered not to have been satisfied. This minimum requirement is considered satisfied in all other cases, until such time as relevant data becomes available.

    As for storing everything in Finland. Yes I believe an EU led agenda to store everything in an EU funded, supported and expanded Onkalo spent nuclear fuel repository would be the best outcome. The second best would be storage at the nation state level.

    This all might be politically difficult but outside of that it is doable.

    I do not think all European countries should have a long term storage plan. I think an EU lead central approach would be better.

  • The ideal solution would be a EU wide low CO2 approach. All countries will experience issues. All countries should have low CO2 base and peak power solutions that can be exchanged in such times.

  • Politically I agree it may be difficult.

    We can handle the waste. We have built permanent locations.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onkalo_spent_nuclear_fuel_repository

    As for where we build locations I think a EU lead agenda modeled off the Onkalo approach would be best.

    The second best would be for Germany to build its own long term storage facility under the same model at one of the several identified good locations.

    https://www.bge.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Standortsuche/Wesentliche_Unterlagen/Zwischenbericht_Teilgebiete/Zwischenbericht_Teilgebiete_-_Englische_Fassung_barrierefrei.pdf

  • This is true and why I think it should be a EU sponsored agenda. This being said a small plot with the right type of rock/location is not so rare it can not be found in all of the EU. We know this for a fact.

    I suspect such a site could also be found in Germany. I mentioned Bayern just because there has been a large study done already that found several durable candidates.

    https://www.bge.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Standortsuche/Wesentliche_Unterlagen/Zwischenbericht_Teilgebiete/Zwischenbericht_Teilgebiete_-_Englische_Fassung_barrierefrei.pdf

  • I live in Germany. I don’t understand the “no space” argument. Just buy a 1km x 1km farm plot in Bayern at one of the known stable rock locations and dig down. The space is there. The footprint is small. Look at the Onkalo site. The above ground footprint is even smaller.

    This being said I think long term storage should be a EU level agenda modeled after the Finnish Onkalo model with shared locations.

    Germany is already dependent on importing energy sources. So importing uranium ore from Canada is no different. Except we would import from an ally. Even solar which I support requires imports. Wind less so but even then our wind turbines are only partially domestic.

    As far as reopening closed plants yah. You are right. I don’t think that is easy to reopen them after such neglect. The short term answer is to buy low CO2 power from France while Germany continues its renewable path. Aka nuclear base energy by proxy.

  • For property software you would be right. Yah.

    But it’s open source AGPL stuff. Full time devs improving AGPL code is good even with pointy haired managers.

    This all being said I don’t think even the managers aim to become more evil and more terrible as their goal.

  • I agree that taiga shouldn’t feature Haliburton.

    This all bearing said do you really think the people working on Taiga seek to be more evil and more terrible?