Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)Y
Posts
8
Comments
1250
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Oh Gott, so hoch ist das schon?????

    Das ist ja ca. 10³⁷⁰ wenn ich korrekt Kopfrechnen und Runden kann.

    Genaues Ergebnis nach Fragen eines Online-Taschenrechners: 5,08 * 10³⁶⁵

     
        
    n! ~ √(2πn) * (n/e)^n
    
    196! ≈ √(2π * 196) * (196/e)^196
    ≈ √(6 * 200) * (196/e)^196 // 35^2 = nahe an 1200
    ≈ 35 * (196/e) ^ 196  // 2,7 * 70 = 189 plus noch ein bisschen
    ≈ 35 * 72^196 // Vorfaktor erst mal ignorieren
    ≈ 70^200
    ≈ 7^200 * 10^200  // 7² = 49 => 7^200 = 49^100
    ≈ 50^100 * 10^200
    ≈ 5^100 * 10^300
    ≈ 2,5^50 * 10^350 // 2,5^3 = 6,25 * 2,5 ≈ 15
    ≈ 15^16 * 10^350
    ≈ 1,5^16 * 10^366
    ≈ 2^10 * 10^366
    ≈ 1000 * 10^366
    ≈ 10^368 // dazu noch den Vorfaktor (3,5 * 10) rechnen und dann noch eins aufrunden damits schön ist
    ≈ 10^370
    
      
  • What about Maltese or Andorran politics?

  • To be fair, school lunches aren't free in Germany.

    Technically they could be considered free if you factor in monthly child benefits (currently at 259€ per child) or parents further qualify for social assistance.

  • You just do not need to go 100% renewable immediately. As per the pareto principle: 80% of the result can be achieved with 20% of the effort.

    Put up enough renewables NOW to achieve 80% green, decentralized energy. But since we are still very far off from that result, there is no need to waste money for nuclear power plants. We don't even have enough renewables to result in negative energy prices, so there is no need for batteries just yet. Guess what happens the moment energy prices do become negative for large parts of the year:

    1. Companies will invest into battery storage to store and later sell this energy.
    2. Conventional power plants cannot operate for half the year or longer.
    3. Energy consumption by companies and households will start to adher to the energy production with the proliferation of smart energy grids.

    Nuclear cannot be adjusted to demand at all by the way. It is extremely inflexible and does not handly varying demand well. Varying demand that will occur in the coming decades due to smart energy grids becoming a thing.

    You also haven't explained why the only countries who build nuclear in significant numbers also possess nuclear weapons. Nobody builds nuclear power plants for the climate.

    As long as we aren't at regular negative energy prices, it is more cost effective and better for the climate to invest into renewables. Once we are there, nuclear power plants are economically unviable due to their aforementioned inflexibility.

    The only economical stopgap until we are fully renewable will be flexible emergency gas power plants that run for a couple of days/weeks per year at most. And due to the fact they are an order of magnitude cheaper than nuclear, you have vastly more resources for expanding battery storage and renewables.

  • Because fossil fuel companies are lobbying for it. Renewables are cheap and quick to set up, every single solar panel immediately lowers the demand for oil/gas/coal a tiny bit.

    Nuclear energy on the other hand takes ages to set up and is far more expensive per kWh than renewables. Every single euro spent on nuclear is one euro taken away from renewables.

    Oh, and in countries with nuclear weapons programmes, nuclear energy is a way to stealthily increase the military budget.

  • Der Post hat zwei Bilder auf Mastodon, Lemmy zeigt nur ein einziges Bild.

  • PB&J

    Jump
  • Please provide an example that fits in the Red/Blue overlap.

  • That liquid is called public swimming pool water you accidentally swallow.

  • Ah, that makes a bit more sense.

    Maximum body temperature should be pretty obvious - at least with one or two degrees (Celsius) of wiggle room.

    Though, with minimum body temperature, do you mean minimum while conscious or minimum survivable? Because there have been cases where people were successfully resuscitated after being submerged in freezing water for a very long time:

    An 8-year-old boy fell through pond ice and was submerged for ≥147 minutes. Nadir peripheral body temperature was 7 °C (45 °F). After rewarming with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, prolonged hospitalization, and neurorehabilitation, the child recovered.

    At 6-month follow-up, he was giving short commands, standing without support, riding a tricycle, eating soft foods, and relearning simple tasks.

    https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jaccas.2025.104885

  • Humans are mostly water though.

    And your scale makes even less sense because you are ignoring time and air moisture (for the maximum temperature). You would probably die very quickly in a 120°C hot sauna if it had 100% moisture.

    Same with the cold: I'd not survive much longer than a minute in -50°C without clothes but with adequate protection several hours seems possible.

  • Zum Glück ist dort die AfD nur über 10%.

  • Just use exponential, income based fines.

    Something like: 5% of your monthly salary or 0.05% of your networth, whichever is higher, adjusted by how much you were speeding of course.

    Then double the fine for each infraction within one year after the first.

  • Wikipedia isn't important because of its data. Rather because of the fact it is continuously updated, extended, and fixed at a gigantic scale.

    If Wikipedia ever dies, its information will lose relevance by the day. After a decade or two without a similar-scale replacement, will anyone even care?

  • Try not to derail please.

    My comment only clarifies the Xcreet stating a German court has deemed the phrase "From the river to the sea" illegal was false. If you have anything to say about this decision from a legal POV feel free to comment, as I am not a lawyer and cannot properly evaluate this decision.

    But whether or not the decision to classify Hamas as a terrorist organization is justified is not something I argued about.

  • This is false.

    The Kammergericht Berlin (uppermost criminal court for Berlin) has ruled the reasoning of the lower instance why this phrase is not an illegal slogan was not sufficient and there were mistakes in the judgement. It has reopened the case and given it back to the same instance to re-evaluate.

    There seem to be two main points:

    1. The fact that a slogan is older than the terrorist organization does not preclude its classification as a distinguishing mark if the organization has adopted the already common phrase in such a way that it at least also appears as its distinguishing mark.

    1. In principle, the grounds for the judgment must indicate the field of expertise of the expert consulted. If the academic training and even the area of activity in which the expert usually works remain unclear, this constitutes a factual and legal error in the judgment.

    There are a couple more minor points from the full reasoning. For example, apparently the court argued even if the phrase were illegal, since the defendant claimed to be an opponent of Hamas they used the parole to display this opposition (analogous to reclaiming slurs) - but the court didn't require the defendant to demonstrate/elaborate on this opposition.

    Here's the full decision, in German

    https://gesetze.berlin.de/bsbe/document/NJRE001632041

    The court has very much NOT ruled about the (il)legality of the phrase. Only that the lower court's reasoning was shit.

  • Stimmt, dass := auch für rekursive Definitionen verwendet wird habe ich nicht berücksichtigt. Ich hab kurz gebraucht um die Tautologie zu sehen, aber du hast recht, wenn man es als rekursiv ansieht bekommt man als "Definition" Σ = Σ raus (und die Menge Σ muss Kardinalität 1 haben - das macht es aber auch etwas schön, da man nun der Variable Σ eindeutig den Wert des einzigen Elements von Σ zuweisen könnte).

     
        
    Σ := Σ_Σ Σ
    <=> Σ = |Σ| * Σ
    <=> 1 = |Σ|
    
    
      

    Fünf Sigmas in einer Gleichung sind aber eindeutig zu viel, das könnte ja noch für Verwirrung sorgen!

  • Nö, gemeint war, dass ich alle Elemente der (abzählbaren) Menge Σ summiere und das Ergebnis in der Variable Σ speicher. Σ in der Summe ist dagegen nur die Zählvariable und soll zeigen, dass die zu summierenden Elemente nicht irgendwie verändert (bspw. quadriert), sondern nur stumpf aufsummiert werden.

    Das meiste folgt zumindest irgendwie durch den Kontext: So kann das Σ in der Summe keine Menge sein, da man diese nicht addieren kann. Und das Σ unter dem Summen-Sigma ist eine Menge, denn man kann nicht einfach eine Zahl alleine dort stehen lassen. Ich glaub aber diese Notation für das Aufsummieren über eine Menge ist nicht Standard, habe es aber so schon gesehen. Und das := zeigt, dass das summeninnere Σ und das, das links definiert wird nicht dasselbe sind.

    Das einzige Problem ist, dass man jetzt zweimal Σ hat: Einmal als Variable mit Zahlenwert und einmal als Menge. Dann muss man eben immer den Kontext betrachten, in dem Σ verwendet wird und danach entscheiden, welches jetzt gemeint ist.

  • Ich hoffe, das ist eindeutig genug.

  • ich_iel @feddit.org

    Xich𝛏iel

  • ich_iel @feddit.org

    ich🧑‍🔬iel

  • Lemmy Shitpost @lemmy.world

    May or may not be based on some comments I've read

  • ich_iel @feddit.org

    ich🌌iel

  • ich_iel @feddit.org

    ich😵‍💫📚🗓️iel

  • DACH - Deutschsprachige Community für Deutschland, Österreich, Schweiz @feddit.org

    SPD-Politiker gesteht Schmiererei: Mit dem Hakenkreuz gegen die AfD

    taz.de /SPD-Politiker-gesteht-Schmiererei/!6103730/
  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    boyruler

  • Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ @lemmy.dbzer0.com

    My torrent with the highest ratio...