Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)Y
Posts
8
Comments
1263
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Me when I spread misinformation:

    But seriously, I genuinely don't think you have ever actually looked at the modlog @ feddit.org or the general attitude towards police in the comments.

    Literally, here's one example of hundreds (that just so happened to be published by Katapult for even better comparison):

    https://feddit.org/post/15019877

    But clearly the mods were upset and removed all comments /s

  • I wanted to be smart and just use Bash pipes to get the result (basically: sed | xattr -n1 command_that_turns_binary_into_decimal | command_that_turns_decimal_into_char ) but I couldn't get the xattr part to work :(

    This would've been perfect for piping dammit! I had to do it by hand just now so I wasted in total like 30 minutes on this.

    I rate my experience a 1/10

  • Ee's eeee eeee eeeeeeeee eeeeeee ee eeeeee eeeeeeeeeee eeee eeee eeeeee. Ee eeeee eee eee eeeeeeee, eeee ee.

    It's even more difficult however to solely communicate with that letter. At least for the receiver, that is.

  • That's easy, you're looking at 𝄽.

    You're welcome!

  • Is that even bread? Or that weird industrial sugar sludge sold in the USA?

    Like, it's way too shiny and smooth. Almost looks like plastic.

  • There's the Ubisoft store too.

    Not that I would ever use it. But it is European.

  • Explanation for those who don't want to watch the video:

    The magnetic field generated by the batteries was so insanely strong, many non-aligned compass needles were, instead of being turned around, permanently re-polarized to conform to the now present magnetic field.

    tl;dr: Exposing compasses to fusion reactor level strong magnetic fields will break (some of) them.

  • 2ich_iel4mich_iel

    Immerhin wars bei mir gestern heute nur um 5:10 🥲

    Und ich muss in ein paar Tagen um 7 aufstehen, das wird lustig.

    PS: rhythmus

  • Widerspruchsfrei trift nur auf den letzten Punkt zu.

    Falsche, ungültige, irrelevante, unvollständige und unverständliche Informationen können immer noch widerspruchsfrei sein.

  • Versehentlich den Perso auf einen (eingeschalteten) Induktionsherd legen, dann sind die Fingerabdrücke weg.

    Leider auch die eID-Funktion, aber man kann ja nicht alles haben.

  • But once you worsen a problem enough, you are the primary cause.

    Conspiracy nuts are harmless until their opinions become more widespread. The root cause is social media illiteracy but if you have nation states acting as fire accelerants every single sparking wire can result in an inferno.

    Oh, and this didn't even start in the 90s. The Soviets didn't spread HIV conspiracy theories for fun and games.

  • Why did Russia bother doing anything if it would've happened regardless apparently?

  • Prinzipiell schon, die meisten Nuklearwaffen sind nicht als Stadtvernichter gedacht, sondern als Schlachtgewinner. Nennt sich taktische Kernwaffe und die haben eine sehr viel schwächere Explosionskraft.

    Nicht grundlos haben Russland/USA sehr viel weniger Interkontinentalraketen als Atombomben. Sich gegenseitig die Städte zu zerstören ist die allerletzte Eskalationsstufe.

    Das Problem: Die europäischen (Frankreich, Großbritannien) Nuklearmächte haben keine/wenige davon. Wenn Russland nun als Kampfmittel nukleare Atillerie verwenden würde, gäbe es keine, nicht-eskalierende Antwort. Du kannst nicht einfach eine 100 Kilotonnen TNT Bombe abwerfen, wenn vereinzelt 500 Tonnen TNT Artillerie verwendet wird.

  • Oh Gott, so hoch ist das schon?????

    Das ist ja ca. 10³⁷⁰ wenn ich korrekt Kopfrechnen und Runden kann.

    Genaues Ergebnis nach Fragen eines Online-Taschenrechners: 5,08 * 10³⁶⁵

     
        
    n! ~ √(2πn) * (n/e)^n
    
    196! ≈ √(2π * 196) * (196/e)^196
    ≈ √(6 * 200) * (196/e)^196 // 35^2 = nahe an 1200
    ≈ 35 * (196/e) ^ 196  // 2,7 * 70 = 189 plus noch ein bisschen
    ≈ 35 * 72^196 // Vorfaktor erst mal ignorieren
    ≈ 70^200
    ≈ 7^200 * 10^200  // 7² = 49 => 7^200 = 49^100
    ≈ 50^100 * 10^200
    ≈ 5^100 * 10^300
    ≈ 2,5^50 * 10^350 // 2,5^3 = 6,25 * 2,5 ≈ 15
    ≈ 15^16 * 10^350
    ≈ 1,5^16 * 10^366
    ≈ 2^10 * 10^366
    ≈ 1000 * 10^366
    ≈ 10^368 // dazu noch den Vorfaktor (3,5 * 10) rechnen und dann noch eins aufrunden damits schön ist
    ≈ 10^370
    
      
  • What about Maltese or Andorran politics?

  • To be fair, school lunches aren't free in Germany.

    Technically they could be considered free if you factor in monthly child benefits (currently at 259€ per child) or parents further qualify for social assistance.

  • You just do not need to go 100% renewable immediately. As per the pareto principle: 80% of the result can be achieved with 20% of the effort.

    Put up enough renewables NOW to achieve 80% green, decentralized energy. But since we are still very far off from that result, there is no need to waste money for nuclear power plants. We don't even have enough renewables to result in negative energy prices, so there is no need for batteries just yet. Guess what happens the moment energy prices do become negative for large parts of the year:

    1. Companies will invest into battery storage to store and later sell this energy.
    2. Conventional power plants cannot operate for half the year or longer.
    3. Energy consumption by companies and households will start to adher to the energy production with the proliferation of smart energy grids.

    Nuclear cannot be adjusted to demand at all by the way. It is extremely inflexible and does not handly varying demand well. Varying demand that will occur in the coming decades due to smart energy grids becoming a thing.

    You also haven't explained why the only countries who build nuclear in significant numbers also possess nuclear weapons. Nobody builds nuclear power plants for the climate.

    As long as we aren't at regular negative energy prices, it is more cost effective and better for the climate to invest into renewables. Once we are there, nuclear power plants are economically unviable due to their aforementioned inflexibility.

    The only economical stopgap until we are fully renewable will be flexible emergency gas power plants that run for a couple of days/weeks per year at most. And due to the fact they are an order of magnitude cheaper than nuclear, you have vastly more resources for expanding battery storage and renewables.

  • Because fossil fuel companies are lobbying for it. Renewables are cheap and quick to set up, every single solar panel immediately lowers the demand for oil/gas/coal a tiny bit.

    Nuclear energy on the other hand takes ages to set up and is far more expensive per kWh than renewables. Every single euro spent on nuclear is one euro taken away from renewables.

    Oh, and in countries with nuclear weapons programmes, nuclear energy is a way to stealthily increase the military budget.

  • Der Post hat zwei Bilder auf Mastodon, Lemmy zeigt nur ein einziges Bild.

  • ich_iel @feddit.org

    Xich𝛏iel

  • ich_iel @feddit.org

    ich🧑‍🔬iel

  • Lemmy Shitpost @lemmy.world

    May or may not be based on some comments I've read

  • ich_iel @feddit.org

    ich🌌iel

  • ich_iel @feddit.org

    ich😵‍💫📚🗓️iel

  • DACH - Deutschsprachige Community für Deutschland, Österreich, Schweiz @feddit.org

    SPD-Politiker gesteht Schmiererei: Mit dem Hakenkreuz gegen die AfD

    taz.de /SPD-Politiker-gesteht-Schmiererei/!6103730/
  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    boyruler

  • Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ @lemmy.dbzer0.com

    My torrent with the highest ratio...