• abracaDavid@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Does anyone else feel like it sets a really bad precedent to attack anyone running under a different party?

  • Carrolade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It is admittedly a little ironic that the Greens’ existence has likely resulted in the rollback of environmental regulations. It’s almost like their top leadership post-Nader is just accelerationist in philosophy.

    • K1nsey6@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I trust Greens to protect environmental policies much more than the DNC, they would follow through with their promises and not just spout populous bullshit while doing nothing.

      • OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Then they should join the DNC and reform it from the inside. Join the progressive movement. Shift the Dems back to the center-left. All they’re doing as a separate party is siphon votes away from DNC, which gives an advantage to the RNC, which erodes their own efforts to push green policies.

        • K1nsey6@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Reforming from the inside is liberal fantasy. The party is operating as designed and they will not allow anyone to vote away their power.

          The solution is to abandon the DNC and support an actual party representing the working class. 3rd party’s do not siphon away votes because we wouldn’t vote for your party if there were no 3rd option on the ballot. We are not democrats so we would not vote for a democrat

          • draneceusrex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I voted 3rd party as a protest vote in a few elections up to 2012, but I recognized that it was exactly that. I also have lived through a term with Trump as president. Because of Trump, women in this country have lost their reproductive rights. That is just the most obvious example of how he has hurt this country. The fact you are still not recognizing that Trump regaining the presidency is an existential threat to democracy is exasperating, especially when the majority of Democrats are allies to a good portion of the Green Party’s so-called platform. Ultimately, you need to face facts: Stein is clearly a shill for Putin and a spoiler for the election.

            • K1nsey6@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              The protest vote is a vote of capitulation for the duopoly. A 3rd party vote cast out of conviction is a vote for democracy. Yours is based on fear and irrationality.

              Dems are only mouth pieces for progress, all talk, zero action. Rince and repeat every election cycle.

              • draneceusrex@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                I am sure your moral high ground will comfort you when Trump opens concentration camps in our own country for the undocumented (among others), and we literally live in A Handmaiden’s Tale. When the “dictator on day one” throws away our constitution and strips our lives away, remember how stoic you are! It could be the last election your vote is even counted for the Green Party, so I hope you are proud of your convictions!

                The Dems aren’t perfect, but they aren’t comprised by Russia like both The Green Party and the GOP. Yes, I’m scared. I saw what happened last time. Why the hell aren’t you?

                • K1nsey6@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Like a rabbit in the open terrified of the wind. Everything you claimed is hyperbole

          • BaldManGoomba@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            In a first past the post democracy there is no 3rd party. There is only the thing that is slightly better. Who is better in everything you want? Trump or Harris? If you say something else. But Harris is Closer to what you want and you choose the 3rd option you are choosing to help Trump win in your state. You choosing 3rd party is one less vote Trump has to win. If you want the green parties policies Trump is the furthest away from it. The time to move the party was during the primary. Now we have to vote for the furthest left thing that has the strongest chance of winning OR we get the right wing thing. Potentially never getting a chance to vote again if you listen to Trump.

            The most minuscule way protest votes are possible is if you live in an overwhelmingly Blue state and you know Harris will win sure vote 3rd party but in Georgia when 11,000 people decided the outcome we can’t risk a movement of voting 3rd party. Title 9 , abortion, climate change belief in government, federal agencies, EPA, postal service, FTC, SEC, redistricting to make fair election maps for the senate and congress, manufacturing, and so much more is on the chopping block for Trump and Republicans let alone more supreme court and federal judges

            • K1nsey6@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              That sounds like a bunch of lesser evil bullshit, lesser evil doesnt exist. That’s bullshit liberals tell themselves to make them feel better for not having the proverbial balls to vote their conscience and do what’s right. It prolongs the suffering of marginalized because they prefer a slow agonizing death over a quick one. There is also the choice of no death. 50.yesrs of liberal ‘lesser evil’ has grown into an enormous one that they can’t control. This is the bed they made and want non Democrats to help them out of the mess they created. Good luck

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s great that they can pretend that’d be the case while standing literally no possible risk of being elected. It’s easy to stand by your morals when there is no risk at all of having to defend or enact them.

        • K1nsey6@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I would rather vote for what I want in government and not get it than to vote against something and get it anyway. Democrats voted against Trump and his policies in 2020 and got someone keeping his worst policies, and now want someone even further to the right than Biden was.

          • otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            This is a completely infantile concept. You wanna throw a tantrum for something you want, regardless of how asinine or unlikely it is, and despite all facts pointing to its irrationality? smdh. 🖕🏽

            • K1nsey6@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Voting for the same people and policies and expecting a different result is the infantile concept

                • K1nsey6@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Just to be clear how has voting for the same people expecting different results changed literally anything? We are having the exact same conversations about wages, housing, employment, healthcare education, etc. that they were having during the civil rights movements, that they were having during the Great depression. If we’re continuing to have the exact same conversations, things are not getting any better

              • bobburger@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                So voting for a random third party and changing absolutely nothing is an infantile concept?

  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Look, whatever you think of Jill Stein, she can only be a threat to democrats because they are vulnerable to arguments from the left. If you don’t want to be vulnerable from the left, adopt some of their popular ideas. Putin isn’t tricking Americans into being anti genocide, or into wanting universal health care.

    • makyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I know there are plenty of arguments to hit the dems on from the left. However, most of the attacks I’m privy to seem to be more about establishing leftist cred than actually doing something productive, and Jill Stein is one of the best examples of this.

        • cogman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yes, but then being unwilling to take any concession is not. The green party could, for example, pull itself off of ballots in key states or elections when the Democrats agree to their policies.

          Running a doomed to fail candidate that only weakens the likelihood of the most left candidates and pulling progressives out of the Democrat party is a bad move.

          Say what your will about RFK, he’s getting political power from Trump by dropping (if Trump wins). What will the green party get? Nothing.

          Dropping and endorsing after concessions is the real way for a minority party to weld power. Running no matter what is just delusion that works counter to any goal you might have.

          • FuzzyRedPanda@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            I just want you to understand how this sounds when it’s flipped:

            Yes, but then being unwilling to take any concession is not. The democrat party could, for example, pull itself off of ballots in key states or elections when the Greens agree to their policies.

            It may be easier to identify this way that this is not a reasonable position, no matter which party it is about.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s not how it works. Hillary wanted someone to blame. Can’t blame herself for having weak stances, god no, never that. Better to blame people who represented what she lacked.

      If you want the left to vote for you, start acting like you’ll push their interests. Or don’t, and blame them when you lose.

      • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Just look at Jill Steins Twitter. She is basically Gaza and attacks on the Democrats. She exclusivly attacks the Democrats. No attacks at all on Trump or the Republicans in general. She also has no problem with climate change or enviromental problems. That is very intressting for a supposed Green Party.

        Other countries with similar electoral systems have Green parties with seats in national parliaments. Compare that with the UK Green Party. They are perfectly able to not just talk about Gaza, but also about UBI, more renewables, public transit, 4 day workweek and so many more left issues.

        • berno@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Democrats deserve to get attacked from the left. Nobody in their right mind is going to vote GOP if they’re voting green, get a fucking clue

          • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Are you seriously suggesting that Gaza is the only problem the Democrats have?

            This is what you do, when you want to take votes from the Democrats. If you wanted to built up real power, to challenge the Democrats from the left, you have to win local smaller elections first. That means city council, house of representatives, state level politicians, school boards and so forth. You focus on the most left leaning regions, so you can actually go first past the post. The Greens do not do that. They run in FOUR elections in California this year. That is the largest blue state, with some very left leaning areas.

            Also once you sit in congress, councils or whatever, you need allies, unless they win a majority. So in most cases that would mean winning the furthest left seats and having to work with a more centrist party, to change things. In the US that would be the Democrats. In some countries there are deals made to not run candidates in certain districts, to make sure left parties win. That just happened in France for example. No reason those deals could not be made between the Democrats and the Greens.

            Also Gaza can only be solved by becoming president. Jill Stein is not going to win the election and everybody with half a brain should no that. So the goal of running, should be to show what the Green Party stands for in local elections. Nobody can solve Gaza when sitting on a city council in the US, however they can built bikelanes, promote renewables, improve public transit, cheap dense green housing and so forth. Jill Stein does not mention those at all. She should, to help out the local candidates, which they are not running. It also means less issues the Democrats might copy. After all who cares, if the Greens or the Democrats pass good laws, as long as they are passed.

            Attacking the Democrats from the left is just going to hurt the Democrats, which helps the Republicans. Instead the Green Party should either try to built an alternative or push them towards the left. Right now it is obvious that they just want to help the Republicans.

  • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Agreed. The Green Party sits on their ass until presidential election. They haven’t moved the needle. Best case scenario, they’ve convinced a few non-voters to participate. Worst case, they’re dishonest opportunists.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      This angle also needs to be considered). She’s not running in good faith. She’s essentially functioning as a 5th column to pull away voters who would otherwise vote for Harris.

      I’m not saying Harris shouldn’t be pushed on environmental issues. I am saying that trying to do that by voting for Stein is actively harmful to the goal of not letting the fascists win this election.

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        More importantly, if you are voting for her because of the environment, voting for stein is actually harmful to that goal because it helps trump win, which means instead of making baby steps in the right direction, we’ll run full steam in the wrong direction.

        • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          The Dems aren’t making baby steps in the right direction, though, look up the progression of natural gas exports under Joe Biden. They’re actively making big steps in the wrong direction.

          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            One metric is the only thing you go by? Do you really think that climate change is driven solely by how much natural gas we export?

            • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Ok, can you please give me other metrics? How many nuclear plants have been built? How much has been invested into new rail infrastructure, whether for freight or for passengers? Have there been any new tariffs on the import of electric vehicles? Any regulation against single family housing, against car dependency, or against meat consumption?

              Please, what metrics have improved, other than renewables being installed (at a much lower rate than in many countries)?

  • PLAVAT🧿S@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t think it bodes well she sat with Putin at a conference, whether there was “language barriers” or not.

    • FuzzyRedPanda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      So what if they we were at the same dinner? I’ve had dinner with my enemies too. It seems like a lot of you are imagining much greater nefarious activity than you have any real evidence for, or I am missing something?

  • Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    democracy enjoyers when people vote for parties that best represent their interests: 😡😡😡😡😡😡

    • Cyteseer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      What interests does Jill Stein actually represent for the people? The green party has never held a local office and she only ever pops up during the election for fundraising. If the green party actually did anything aside from campaigning for the presidency, no one would have this criticism.

      • Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        off the top of my head, she’s the only one calling for a full arms embargo of Israel, and also the only one pushing for medicare for all. she has also consistently criticized trump and biden’s immigration policies. all of this aligns with my interests, and so she is who I will most likely vote for.

        The green party has never held a local office

        this is wrong. As of the November 7, 2023 elections, at least 142 Greens hold elected office. I found this with 2 seconds of googling.

    • Skeezix@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      One might argue that a two-party system (with the electoral college the way it is) is not a democracy

      • Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        the system devised by wealthy landowners to keep power out of the hands of common people isn’t actually a democracy? I’m shocked. Shocked, I say!