https://archive.is/1mKTL

At this point just pay China to build the damn thing, everything we have is already made in China anyway what’s the difference

  • 7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 hours ago

    So this is going to end up with them using lots of public transport budget to build the dedicated high speed bus freeways, the idea immediatly falters for reasons obvious to anyone that hasn’t been kicked in the head by a horse and then ah well, since we have the dedicated bus highway network but no busses might aswell open it to cars

  • AstroStelar [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Reasons for California HSR’s troubles:

    • Bureaucratic hurdles, constant political uncertainty
    • Land acquisition issues/NIMBYs
    • No local knowledge on how to build high-speed rail so everything’s bespoke
    • Too many layers of subcontractors and consultants

    The only thing this alleviates is maybe land acquisition, because you can more easily follow existing highway corridors and just drive into downtown, while making all other problems worse because now there’s no GLOBAL expertise!

    In the article, a professor suggests that it could be used to supplement high-speed rail by setting them up as “feeder lines” between HSR stations and nearby towns. But the line is already designed so that most towns in the Central Valley are less than thirty minutes away by car from an HSR station, so what’s the point?

  • SootySootySoot [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Great, those are obviously unsafe on the freeway for a thousand reasons, so let’s just whack those on dedicated roads. And since only those buses go on the roads, they could be steel wheels on steel road for extraordinarily better efficiency, and obviously steel is pricey so we’ll just limit the road to two ‘rail’ like lengths. Dedicated lines can be electrified for more efficiency, build some dedicated bus board/alight platforms, a bit of signalling to prevent crashes and avoid building excessive rail, extensible for varying passenger numbers, and BAM, perfect project.

    train-shining

  • Hestia [she/her, fae/faer]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I’m suggesting a new form of transportation that is truly American.

    What we will do is create a giant gun. The bullet will house the passengers who are then launched to their destination. In order to safety stop, we will create giant mannequins out of ballistic gel…

    The giant mannequins will be named after prominent African American figures

  • Hestia [she/her, fae/faer]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’d love to ride in one of these things only for it to smash directly into a car because it’s in the “designated” bus lane

    These people are just fishing for government handouts. They have no intention of actually making this happen.

  • Damarcusart [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    14 hours ago

    What if we had something that was like a train, except far more dangerous, obscenely more fuel inefficient and expensive to run, subject to far more unpredictable conditions due to other drivers, and would travel on a road instead of a railway line which requires far more maintenance? And would just go far slower than HSP anyway?

    • LittleFellaNamedBoof [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Not even just worse. It’s like the worst idea ever. a 140mph bus has enough kinetic energy to turn the average passenger vehicle into a literal pancake. Nobody is surviving that.