• mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Important: Even after the modem is removed, if you connect your phone to the car via Bluetooth then the car will use your phone as an internet connection and send all the same telemetry data back to Toyota.

    that is so fucking insidious

  • blargh513@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I did something similar to a 5th gen camaro. It was much easier. Take out the cell modem unit, open the case, pull out a physical hardware pin bridge that connected it to the OnStar unit. Done.

    The only thing I lost was an in-dash compass heading.

    The modem was 2g so its dead now anyway, I suppose I could put the bridge back and get the compass. I won’t though, that takes effort and road signs have directions on them. There is always the sun too.

  • oOAlteredBeastOo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 day ago

    Thank you for posting this. These devices are getting out of control. They are marketed as a convenience to the driver, when in actuality they are capturing and selling your location and driving habit information to data brokers and insurance companies. Sometimes dealerships will even add an aftermarket tracking device to their vehicles without telling you. I removed one that I found in a Crosstrek I bought last year. The device I removed was made by iKON Technologies, and is ‘intended’ to be used for lot management at the dealership. The dealership tried to sell me an overpriced security plan associated with the GPS tracker. I declined. They left it on anyway. What they don’t tell you is that iKON Technologies installs them at no cost to the dealership, and that the tracker is used for repossessions and capturing data to be used for targeted marketing or sell to data brokers. Some devices have the ability to inhibit your starter and ignition system like the one in this manual.

      • JordanZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Because until you pay off the car, the bank owns it. If you paid cash then I’d have insisted the dealer remove it from the vehicle at their cost otherwise I’ll just buy the car from another dealer that doesn’t do that crap.

        I demand they remove a bunch of stuff. Dealer plate frames, or even worse the stupid dealer stickers on the vehicle. I’m buying a car, not a billboard for your dealership.

    • GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’ve thought about making a business that makes drop in electric kits for popular vehicles. So you could take an older worn out vehicle and refresh it with full electric. It would probably cost $20k or so, but that’s much cheaper than a new car.

      • Soapbox@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, its already a growing industry I have my eye on. I would love to just electrify my gas guzzler.

      • Eheran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        There are not enough people around that would sink that much money into an old vehicle.

        • GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          It depends, if you watch Dave’s Auto Center people will sink that much into just an engine for an old truck. If fuel prices go up and demand for used evs goes up then I could see it as a solid alternative. I would have to target the most common vehicles that are currently on the road and make universal motors and smaller battery segments so that they could be packaged for different vehicles using the same parts.

  • BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    2 days ago

    If this is a more complicated version for you and you want a quick and dirty one, just disconnect the fuse marked DCM in the fuse box under the steering wheel. This will kill it’s power, however there is a built in battery in the DCM module that will take a few days to die. This does cause the microphone to not work as well, but its an option. I did it when I bought my '21 RAV4 Hybrid over 2 years ago and it hasn’t caused more issues than the microphone not working.

      • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        2 days ago

        For voice calls with your phone, some cars have voice activated features, etc.

        It’s all crap I don’t need.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          My sentiments there. I was wracking my brain trying to find a use case where I would actually need my car to hear me, and I now miss my '86 SAAB 900 SPG

      • favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Aside from phone calls, I do find it handy to use with CarPlay when I need to get directions while driving or respond to an SMS.

      • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        So my mom can call me because she’s lost, but doesn’t want to stop to check her Google maps because she’s in a “dangerous part of town” (downtown Seattle).

        (My mum’s not a bigot btw, she just lived in a village of 1000 people until she was 29 and anywhere with more than 20 people at once makes her anxious. Costco trips also have her on alert like she’s part of Seal Team Six)

          • SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            2 days ago

            It is against traffic laws to be wearing anything on your ears in many places. I got pulled over in Colorado in around 2010 for having one ear of a wired headset on. Didn’t get a ticket, but still sucked.

            It’s something about being able to hear sirens and stuff around you. It’s dumb because people will blast music as loud as they want but having one ear covered gets you in trouble.

              • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                15 hours ago

                Yeah I’m sure those laws only exist in states where no one has taken the extra time and money to challenge them, because they’re obviously inconsistent and unjust.

              • HydraulicMonkey@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Deaf people spend their entire live deaf and they adapt. They don’t suddenly become deaf when they start driving.

            • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Agreed. That sounds like needless legislation. Especially considering that there have been studies that show that “loud pipes DON’T save lives.” The interior of modern cars are so soundproofed that most people won’t hear those really loud motorcycles until they are right next to them. Same for many sirens I would wager.

              • this_1_is_mine@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                More to do with the Doppler effect than anything dealing with sound deadening. You also don’t point the pipes the direction your going .

      • BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        To kill the antenna with these you need to pull trim off the car to access the antenna plugs. Pulling the fuse takes 30 seconds and doesn’t require tools unless you have fat fingers like me and can’t grip the fuse to pull it.

        Also, this could kill your FM/AM radio access depending on how things are wired and that may not be for everyone.

        Good to know these exist though

        • Fmstrat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          True, but onany cars pulling the fused trips other errors. For instance on many Jeep/Chryslers you get check engine lights.

        • Fmstrat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          There are a number of writups online, but basically you disconnect the antennas at the head unit, and replace with these. Without them there is no resistance so the system knows things are wrong (and damage can be caused), while these fool the system into thinking there is no signal.

  • favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Congratulations - your car no longer has the capability to transmit telemetry data. Of course it may still be captured to local storage and can be physically collected later, but for me that was fine.

    Yeah, and it’s unknown how much telemetry the car keeps. Hopefully, the removal of GPS means the car no longer logs every location the car travels, but without that there are some reports that modern vehicles keep years of GPS data locally, so it’s possible for an intruder like law enforcement to see everywhere you’ve ever taken your vehicle.

  • caboose2006@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    My wife is worried (and so am I) about getting anything newer than like a 2016 for this reason. I’m glad we’re able to rip that shit out of newer cars

  • scala@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    Very cool. Passing this on to friends and family with the RAV4.

    This makes me feel better of buying a new Toyota in the near future.

    Dumb question if the modem is removed, why need to remove the GPS?

    • poVoq@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 days ago

      Dumb question if the modem is removed, why need to remove the GPS?

      The article says that while not needed, it helped with some bugs when using a phone as the navigation device.

    • sic_semper_tyrannis@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      If you go to the dealership they’ll get all your data that’s stored locally. I imagine an independent shop using Toyota’s software will probably do the same thing. Also buying a new car lets these companies know that you’re okay with having your right to repair be taken away since this is the industry practice. New cars also have massively higher yearly registration fees and parts are more expensive to replace and lots of computers in the cars do have issues.

      Just get an older car. Early 2000s. The 1.9ALH diesel in VW Jettas can be tuned to get insane fuel economy, up to ~60mpg. What do you really need in a new car that can’t be installed in an old car? Fuel economy, sound deadening, double din Bluetooth carplay head unit, etc

      • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Back in 2009 I got a brand new Honda Fit (Jazz in other markets) 3 weeks later I got into an accident and the car was written off as totalled because the body design had changed that year and no parts were available yet.

        Sometimes the parts are expensive because there are fewer parts on the market when the car is new.

      • scala@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oh for sure.

        It’s the spouce that needs convincing. I won’t sell my early 2000s for this exact reason. Insane MPG no electronic bullshit.

        We need something bigger with 3 rows for the kids as our two row is just way to small. Try and convince them to find something old, reliable and data gathering free is a challenge.

    • pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      cause the GPS doesn’t work right after the change, and sometimes the phone will use the car GPS location, which is wrong.

    • tgr819@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      GPS does not need the internet to operate (atleast it can send requests for positioning data). Although location accuracy can be improved if you combine things like triangulation w/ cellular towers and wifi connections.

  • perishthethought@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Great write up. Something I’ve thought of doing many times with my Honda.

    The plugs will only fit on the correct wires, there’s no way to get it wrong

    Haha, bet I could find a way to mess that up.

    • pianoplant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Car GPS: always able to track you.

      Phone GPS App: choose your vendor (e.g. openstreetmaps vs Google), set the app to only have location access when in use.

      Significantly better control.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Can you please write English? No idea what you are talking about.

      • Alk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        2 days ago

        Translation: “what if you are in a place you don’t know though? (serious question)”

          • AzuranAurora@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            Back in my day, we did a little thing called “pulling over to the side of the road or into a parking lot before pulling out the map”. You don’t read the map in the middle of traffic, silly!

          • percent@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Fun fact: Automobiles and roads have existed for much longer than GPS navigation. Maps were very common and not “massive”.

            If you were taking a road trip, you might bring a larger map (known as an “atlas”), but those were more like books (vs. local maps, which were just a folded piece of paper).

            Neither were massive. Local/regional maps fit easily in pretty much any compartment or pocket in the car. Atlases wouldn’t fit in quite as many places, but they were still manageable.

            • Kasane Teto@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I know what an Atlas is (british schools are behind enough that they still use them) but the same principle applies that it might not be the best idea to unfold and read a whole in the middle of rush hour traffic

              • frongt@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                Rush hour traffic is usually going slow enough that you probably could. But in fast traffic, yeah, that’s why you don’t do that, you fold it down to the part you need.