That makes sense, you do not want bubbles and it surely will overflow. But why should they burn out because of that? There is lower resistance etc. and cooling is still mostly working. I really see no way how it damages the machine. I repaired a bunch before, so this is not coming from nowhere. So I googled and found this:
https://robertbair.com/blog/i-accidentally-put-dish-soap-dishwasher-now-what
And that makes total sense. It only damages if the soap "crust" builds up too much. That is not a quick thing to happen. Otherwise it is all about the mess or makes.
I tried to point out that we can only protect nature when people actually want that. Because it costs money and is inconvenient. How do you get people to like nature and not want to destroy it actively or passively? Zoos are one such way. There is no human-animal interaction that is inherently neutral or positive, it is always in some way bad for the animals.
You need a place where people can interact with animals so they can start to appreciate them. Not ideal for those animals, but not doing it will be worse overall.
I have heard essentially one arguments for this so far:
Anything will be blown away anyway, so why bother spending more money for a concrete structure?
To which I like to ask what the shelters are made of. Hmmm...
But when he says it, why is it a thought bubble?