A woman whose murder conviction was overturned after she served 43 years of a life sentence was released Friday, despite attempts in the last month by Missouri’s attorney general to keep her behind bars.

Sandra Hemme, 64, left a prison in Chillicothe, hours after a judge threatened to hold the attorney general’s office in contempt if they continued to fight against her release. She reunited with her family at a nearby park, where she hugged her sister, daughter and granddaughter.

Hemme had been the longest-held wrongly incarcerated woman known in the U.S., according to her legal team at the Innocence Project. The judge originally ruled on June 14 that Hemme’s attorneys had established “clear and convincing evidence” of “actual innocence” and he overturned her conviction. But Republican Attorney General Andrew Bailey fought her release in the courts.

“It was too easy to convict an innocent person and way harder than it should have been to get her out, even to the point of court orders being ignored,” her attorney Sean O’Brien said. “It shouldn’t be this hard to free an innocent person.”

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    “She’s going to need help,” he said, noting she won’t be eligible for social security because she has been incarcerated for so long.

    FFS she’s owed a hell of a lot more than social security! 😠 The court should also order the state to pay her a huge damages payment that will afford a comfortable income for the rest of her life.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      33
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m against the massive payouts over changed convictions. It makes it less likely states will play ball with not fighting overturned convictions (except this missouri d-bag) and its oftentimes not the states fault they were wrongly convicted. Give her like $150k, and then like $50k a year from then on.

      • echutaaa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Was she arrested by a state trooper? Was she accused by a state prosecutor? Was she sent to prison by a state judge? Why is it not the states fault?

      • hyperreal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        5 months ago

        Not to mention, damages paid by governments don’t just come out of thin air. Contemporary taxpayers shoulder the burden, in some way, for the misdeeds of previous generations. An unfortunate reality. At the same time, I wholeheartedly agree that this woman deserves some form of additional restitution. It just becomes very tricky who actually bears that cost.

        • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          5 months ago

          Taxpayers also pay the money for her being wrongfully imprisoned. Taxpayers also suffer from her not being able to contribute to the economy. Taxpayers pay the salary of the shitheads that framed and convicted her.

          That is how a state works. Of all these things her being compensated for wrongful imprisonment is the least problematic to pay for.

          • Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Not to mention the taxpayers are who voted for the police chief and the judges who wrongfully incarcerated this woman

          • hyperreal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            My point is more about public servants, such as the justice system, government officials, etc. not doing a good job. Everyone loses in this case. I’m not at all against government spending. It’s just really unfortunate that (1) this woman’s life was ruined and (2) we as a society also have to foot that bill.

          • hyperreal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Not at all. I agree that’s what tax funds are for and ought to be spent when necessary. I’m just making a more nuanced point that it’s unfortunate that government officials and the justice system not doing a proper job has led to two adverse outcomes.

  • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    The St. Joseph Police Department, meanwhile, ignored evidence pointing to Michael Holman — a fellow officer, who died in 2015 — and the prosecution wasn’t told about FBI results that could have cleared Hemme, so it was never disclosed before her trials, the judge found.

    Evidence presented to Horsman showed that Holman’s pickup truck was seen outside Jeschke’s apartment, that he tried to use her credit card, and that her earrings were found in his home.

    So a cop was suspected in the murder but the PD framed an innocent woman?? Jfc.

    ACAB ACAB ACAB

    • NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Thank you for beating me to this. I had just copied that section to post this exact same thing.

      How many other people are in prison to cover up the crimes of the police?

    • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m generally opposed to capital punishment. But in cases where cops or prosecutors are involded in committing a murder or covering it up, there should be an exception.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    5 months ago

    Bailey, who was appointed attorney general after Eric Schmitt was elected to the U.S. Senate in 2022, has a history of opposing overturning convictions, even when local prosecutors cite evidence of actual innocence.

    This guy literally wants innocent people to be in prison.

    And I bet he’ll win the election.

  • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Under current law, only someone shown to be innocent by means of a DNA test is eligible for compensation after being released. The law allows $36,500 a year for the same number of years the person was wrongly incarcerated.

    The vetoed bill would have increased the payment to $65,000 a year and expanded it to include people freed by the conviction review process created in a 2021 law.

    Source

    The conviction review process:

    In order for elected prosecutors to have a pathway to correct wrongful convictions, it was up to the state legislature to pass a law

    Source

    If this innocent person was eligible for payments in Missouri, which she is not, and if the bill was passed to increase payments, then she may have received a maximum of $2.8m. However, it’d be paid as an annuity of $65k per year. If she dies her family would get nothing more. And, the payments are in lieu of a civil suit.

    She’ll have to sue if she wants justice. I hope she does. I’ve been to prison. I think she deserves to be comfortable for the rest of her life.

          • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            In the US most of them want out by time the weather gets warm. They spend time in county jails for smaller crimes of misdemeanors. Very few individuals choose state prison for greater crimes of felonies.

            How’s it setup in Canada? Same thing different words?

            • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Nope.

              Local PD jails are only holding cells for overnight/weekend stays to handle court appearances or until bail can be set. Almost every prisoner then ends up in a provincial correction jail (if bail is not met or offered) until their court case is completed. Sentences of less that 2 years (aka deuce less) are served in the same correction centres, more than 2 years is in a federal penitentiary.

              • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Canada has local facilities and provincial correction facilities performing the tasks of our county jails.

                The US also has federal penetentiaries for the worst crimes with the longest sentences. But, it’d be rare for a relatively short two year sentence to be served in one.

                The US system seems more distributed. Each state and county can, to a great extent, decide the conditions under which prisoners live. This is one reason it’s very difficult to reform our prison system.

                All prisoners suffer. Could you please tell me more about how the system is constructed and the nature of suffering in Canada? Are conditions more consistent? Is there access to actual support in rehabilitation?

                • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Our institutions still have ongoing issues with solitary confinement, lack of mental health supports and lack of training/retraining opportunities.

                  Conditions tend to be better than what American jails sound like (a guess, as I can only go on what I read about them).

                  I’m unsure what you mean about how the system is constructed, ie: judicial, penal, etc

  • TheBigBrother@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    There is no money what can redeem that shit. It doesn’t matter how much money she get paid for that.

      • TheBigBrother@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        5 months ago

        Money isn’t justice, the judge and the jury who prosecuted her should be imprisoned at least for 43 years for that.

        • acutfjg@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s not justice, but she definitely deserves it to make her life easier. Wtf is wrong with you

          • TheBigBrother@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’m not saying she shouldn’t be paid, what I’m saying it’s giving someone money for that isn’t justice, that’s it. You can’t fix everything just paying money.

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 months ago

    this is so suspicious. it needs more deep digging and she should be given money out of the pockets of those that kept her in.

  • smb@lemmy.ml
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    isn’t even trying to keep an innocent behind bars already a type of kidnapping attempt and every second of delay that it caused an actual act of kidnapping?

    • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      During a court hearing Friday, Judge Ryan Horsman said that if Hemme wasn’t released within hours, Bailey himself would have to appear in court Tuesday morning. He threatened to hold the attorney general’s office in contempt.

      Props to the judge tho, 'cause threatening Bailey with contempt charges could have landed him in jail (for a bit anyways).

      “See my big gavel here? If you don’t release her immediately this gavel will crash into your thick, stupid skull … with force.”

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Honestly, there should still be an inquest or something where the guy is brought in and must explain wtf he was thinking or trying to accomplish by fighting her release. And if he doesn’t have a satisfying answer, remove him from the position.

        And no, I wouldn’t consider “trying to save the state taxpayers from a lawsuit for the false imprisonment” a satisfying answer.

        In fact, if he can’t defend a position such that it’s reasonable to believe she was actually guilty, there should be criminal charges against him and anyone who worked with him to stop or stall the release. And I’d say this should be the case for any prosecution where it becomes just about winning a case rather than demonstrating the truth in court.