I think if you would re-watch it now, you’d think to yourself “yeah, thinking it was only a year or two was just silly”

Are we just making up TIL’s, now? There was never an exact number in mind or set when the movie was made. Just “long”.

I think most people who watched the movie a time or two (or twenty) already knew it was many years that had gone by. What time frame were you imagining? Like 6 months or something?

I’d quit too. America was too stupid to not vote trump in again, so why the hell martyr yourself for half a country of clowns when it gains you nothing?

https://www.istockphoto.com/vector/woah-gm841162790-137135717

Like a rewrite of over 50 books? Or a little fan story?

Or your definition is wrong.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/armed-robbery.

If having a gun made them all mugging, then no one who wasnt caught in the act would ever get charged with armed robbery.

I should really see about getting ahold of that series. I still haven’t read it.

Not my comment. I was just talking about HG and the Katness love triangle.

…No they aren’t. Katniss is 16 at the beginning of book 1 and would have been 17 or older by the end of book 3.

What you replied with was something that couldn’t really have happened, and nothing in the article even eludes to being a possibility.

Oh shit. I put a comma instead of a period. Www.wicked.com

I didn’t like PJ as a charector and by a few books in I was just hoping he’d lose.

Animorphs was a far better YA series.

Yeah…three books of “oh woah is me. I can’t make up my mind of which of the two boys that likes me I like more. Choosing is so hard”

*Edit. Lol. Some of y’all got real defensive. They were pretty good books and movies, but the love interest subplot was still cringy and I’m sticking to it.

Well the article plainly states that half the wire transfers were able to be reversed/taken back…

FYI: the box is “www.wicked,com” instead of wickedmovie.com.

Edit. Oopsie. I comma’d a period. Www.wicked.com

It’s not a mugging if you aren’t at least beat up. This is nothing but robbery. No tip!

It’s very unlikely that the ambulance would drive by and turn right in front of the bicyclist (which would still show that the bicyclist didn’t stop at the intersection) and the article didn’t state that at all.

The “with color enhancements” part makes me just want to see it as it would naturally look.

Most of the people in here are dead set on assuming it’s not the biker. So what are the odds that the ambulance was just passing the biker and cutting him off at the turn? I’d call it less than 50/50.

But move past that and keep going. If the biker was just cut off right before getting to the intersection, then that also means the biker didn’t stop at the intersection.

That means that at best the biker was partially at fault.