Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)B
帖子
0
评论
2371
加入于
3 yr. ago

  • They might have set up the user agreement for it. Stackexchange did and their whole business model was about catching businesses where some worker copy/pasted code from a stackexchange answer and getting a settlement out of it.

    I agree with you in principle (hell, I'd even take it further and think only trademarks should be protected, other than maybe a short period for copyright and patent protection, like a few years), but the legal system might disagree.

    Edit: I'd also make trademarks non-transferrable and apply to individuals rather than corporations, so they can go back to representing quality rather than business decisions. Especially when some new entity that never had any relation to the original trademark user just throws some money at them or their estate to buy the trust associated with the trademark.

  • so true

    跳过
  • One time, I arrived at a small store as an employee was finishing their smoke break, exchanged friendly words as we both went towards the door. In that moment, I realized that if I open the door, it'll be right in his way and I paused, unsure about how to handle it. He ended up opening it for me, but the whole thing felt awkward as fuck, like my pause was because I was waiting for him to open it for me. Easily the worst door opening experience I've ever had. I'm a dude btw.

  • so true

    跳过
  • You can do the "push open the door more as you let it go" and let them decide if they would rather hurry to get it or just open it themselves.

  • so true

    跳过
  • I really don't understand people who want that. It's so infantilizing to have someone else do basic shit for you, especially if you need to wait for it. It crosses a line from basic politeness to learned helplessness and is often a motivation for weaponized incompetence, so I also don't understand the people who do those things for a partner that demands it. It would be an instant loss of interest for me.

  • Seems to me like the bubble is getting even worse because of efforts to deny that it is a bubble in the first place.

  • Oh yeah, I understand the sentiment entirely. With so many dark patterns dominating the world we live in because we live in a society that decided to embrace greed instead of seeing it as a primary motivator of evil, I can't blame anyone that looks at the state of things with suspicion anytime there are downsides. And while it isn't realistic to expect as good audio from a built-in system as a separate dedicated audio system, I do think it's ridiculous that the standard is so dysfunctional that you either can't understand what people are saying or explosions are way too loud. Especially in this digital world where mixing separate audio channels isn't a difficult task. Streaming services should just have a stereo and mono version of the audio that is mixed well for that format if it is actually a harder problem than I think it is.

    Some of it is practicality, but I don't doubt that greed also plays into it. I mean, even on the modularity side, I don't have the option of easily finding a TV without any speakers at all, or a TV without smart features that a) aren't as good as other options I have to access those features and b) were actually thrown in to spy on data, as your previous comment mentioned.

    So yeah, I don't blame you at all for being suspicious of the companies that absolutely are trying to fuck their users because their real customers are data buyers, even if I do prefer my soundbar.

  • Can you do the Jackie Chan style "pull the slide off someone's pistol so they only have gun parts instead of a functional gun in their hand?"

  • I appreciate TVs not wasting resources on putting decent speakers in it that I'll never use because I did buy a soundbar over a decade ago that has decent sound and has outlasted the TV I bought it for. Plus TVs are so thin these days that they probably can't even drive decent bass, and the speakers they do have are rear facing, so they don't even drive the sound towards you.

    Modularity isn't a bad thing IMO.

  • Just double click your headboard and your bed maximizes.

  • Sucks that they don't and that they don't do the open source thing so that the community could improve the quality. Is it because of wayland or something else that it isn't fully compatible?

  • Your eyeballs hurt every single moment of your life.

  • Yeah, when you're compiling from source code, it's much easier to add in ARM support. Kernels do need to handle more hardware-specific stuff, like interrupt handling, context switching, feature enablement and the like will likely need custom ASM code and might have different parameters/events to handle. But at the user level, you can often compile for ARM by just changing a few command line arguments and it'll be fine as long as you don't rely on inline ASM and have ARM versions of any libraries you need.

    You still might need to do some adjustments for specific behavior differences when it comes to concurrency and atomicity of operations. It didn't surprise me to see that the previous attempt to make an ARM ReactOS didn't support multi-threading, because trying to enable it was probably an unreliably buggy mess with race conditions all over the place.

  • They tried to jump right into the "popular thing drives high demand for popular spaces in popular thing" and skip the whole "make thing popular" step, banking on their name and people thinking it'll make them a ton of money.

    Though tbh I can't say that was necessarily the wrong move (at least not if their entire goal is maximizing gains), since it wasn't going to get popular like they wanted in the first place, so skipping that step and going straight to fleecing those dumb enough to throw money at it might have made the most sense.

    That said, I think they put more money into it than they got out of it, so I doubt that it was deliberate. Zuck probably just thought if he paid people to make it, users would just flock to it and it would be as popular as fictional VR worlds are, despite missing the tactile VR system they tend to use or the whole "VR world is popular (or the focus of everyone's life)" being a plot point rather than the consequence of someone building the world and people choosing to spend their time and money there.

    Also, I'm in the demographic that probably would have been the most interested (like as a user of VR, not someone looking to just make money from it), but their offering didn't even raise enough curiosity for me to check out what they made. There is an anti-meta bias in play, but even if it had been offered by a separate entity, I still wouldn't have been interested because it sounded enshitified from the moment of concept.

  • Lol I wonder if they'll rename the company again to try to make it look like AI in general is them.

  • Running another uarch is a whole new level of complexity vs just running on a different OS but with the same uarch, especially if concurrency is involved because translating from one instruction set to another can break atomicity assumptions that concurrency depends on to maintain coherency. You'd need to do thorough analysis of the code to determine where special care is needed, and even then, it won't be trivial setting it up in a way that avoids deadlock because you have to understand what the threads are doing before you can say if it's safe for one thread to wait for another (since they could end up waiting for each other).

    Whereas running code meant for a different OS just requires implementing that OS' API (and behaviour, possibly including undocumented behaviour some code relies on, which can vary from application to application, hence windows compatibility modes where they add a translation layer themselves). Not saying this is trivial, but compared to the above problem, it kinda is.

    Not that ARM support is impossible, just if they manage that, it will be proclaimed loudly, not something that requires digging. If they don't say it supports ARM, just assume it doesn't.

  • Poll: Should "I don't know" be the most common answer to any survey?

    • Yes
    • I don't know
    • No
  • Mama!

    跳过
  • Interesting article but it's sad to see that website using dark patterns like subscribe popups and fucking with the back button.

  • Mama!

    跳过
  • The idea is that the big bang started as a singularity, where everything had the same position as far as our 3d space is concerned, and then the difference in position arose as a consequence of it. Maybe space (as we know it) didn't exist before, maybe it did but collapsed, or maybe there was "other" space but this space we're in popped into existence. Same thing with time and perhaps some other dimensions.

    So it did happen everywhere (where everywhere is just everywhere inside this universe), but it was a single point at that moment.

    Though I suspect it was inside another universe and that our big bang singularity was just another black hole forming in that universe and we're seeing the mystery of what happens beyond the event horizon when gravity overpowers all other forces. Our familiar forces could just be the next set of rules physics for small things (from the perspective of the parent universe) after gravity overcomes the dominant ones in that universe. Which could mean that all black holes are tunnels to other universes (that we can't visit but the matter that makes us could, though it would probably be something else once it did, like an entire galaxy cluster).

    Then the CMB might just be light that entered our universe from the parent one, redshifted like crazy (plus other optical gravitational effects, like any light that enters will appear brighter in one direction but coming from all directions to some extent).