You might get better results by going outside their channels and using legal options. Like not through the courts, but I think some jurisdictions have a law that you data must be deleted if a request is sent in writing or something like that. You might also be able to request they send you all the data they have (though this might cost money because they print it and mail it). I remember someone did that with their Tinder data for some article about how shitty Tinder is, though it depends on where you live.
- Posts
- 0
- Comments
- 2548
- Joined
- 3 yr. ago
- Posts
- 0
- Comments
- 2548
- Joined
- 3 yr. ago
I mean the masses are pretty fucking stupid and I don't think following them is a good strategy for life.
Also, reddit was and somehow still is pretty popular and stack exchange is being killed by AI not discord, so that's not really accurate anyways.
Still damned if he does because either he needs to mention specific things to limit the scope of the pardon and incriminates himself, or keeps it vague and she loses the 5th ammendment protections from talking.
I wonder if that was actually just an attempt to sell more copies by describing the clearly better control scheme as scary as a challenge to anyone who thought it sounded ok. Like I don't think it took me long to understand that the Halo control scheme was a game changer compared to the ones that preceded it (other than mouse and keyboard).
But because there wasn't anything better to compare it to, it didn't feel that bad.
Metroid Prime transcended its crappy controls. Like one of the worst control schemes but still one of my all time favorites.
Over time, the more common mistakes would be integrated into the tree. If some people feel indigestion as a headache, then there will be a probability that "headache" is caused by "indigestion" and questions to try to get the user to differentiate between the two.
And it would be a supplement to doctors rather than a replacement. Early questions could be handled by the users themselves, but at some point a nurse or doctor will take over and just use it as a diagnosis helper.
(Assuming you meant "you" instead of "I" for the 3rd word)
Yeah, it fits more with the older definition of AI from before NNs took the spotlight, when it meant more of a normal program that acted intelligent.
The learning part is being able to add new branches or leaf nodes to the tree, where the program isn't learning on its own but is improving based on the expeirences of the users.
It could also be encoded as a series of probability multiplications instead of a tree, where it checks on whatever issue has the highest probability using the checks/questions that are cheapest to ask but afffect the probability the most.
Which could then be encoded as a NN because they are both just a series of matrix multiplications that a NN can approximate to an arbitrary %, based on the NN parameters. Also, NNs are proven to be able to approximate any continuous function that takes some number of dimensions of real numbers if given enough neurons and connections, which means they can exactly represent any disctete function (which a decision tree is).
It's an open question still, but it's possible that the equivalence goes both ways, as in a NN can represent a decision tree and a decision tree can approximate any NN. So the actual divide between the two is blurrier than you might expect.
Which is also why I'll always be skeptical that NNs on their own can give rise to true artificial intelligence (though there's also a part of me that wonders if we can be represented by a complex enough decision tree or series of matrix multiplications).
Or suits so good at flight camera people need to also be pro ski jump++ level to keep up with them. Better, actually, because they have to do it while keeping the athlete in frame on a camera.
Same with the idea of "true names" in general.
Water loves touching itself.
Yeah, if you turn off randomization based on the same prompts, you can still end up with variation based on differences in the prompt wording. And who knows what false correlations it overfitted to in the training data. Like one wording might bias it towards picking medhealth data while another wording might make it more likely to use 4chan data. Not sure if these models are trained on general internet data, but even if it's just trained on medical encyclopedias, wording might bias it towards or away from cancers, or how severe it estimates it to be.
Funny because medical diagnosis is actually one of the areas where AI can be great, just not fucking LLMs. It's not even really AI, but a decision tree that asks about what symptoms are present and missing, eventually getting to the point where a doctor or nurse is required to do evaluations or tests to keep moving through the flowchart until you get to a leaf, where you either have a diagnosis (and ways to confirm/rule it out) or something new (at least to the system).
Problem is that this kind of a system would need to be built up by doctors, though they could probably get a lot of it there using journaling and some algorithm to convert the journals into the decision tree.
The end result would be a system that can start triage at the user's home to help determine urgency of a medical visit (like is this a get to the ER ASAP, go to a walk-in or family doctor in the next week, it's ok if you can't get an appointment for a month, or just stay at home monitoring it and seek medical help if x, y, z happens), then it can give that info to the HCW you work next with for them to recheck things non-doctors often get wrong and then pick up from there. Plus it helps doctors be more consistent, informs them when symptoms match things they aren't familiar with, and makes it harder to excuse incompetence or apathy leading to a "just get rid of them" response.
Instead people are trying to make AI doctors out of word correlation engines, like the Hardee boys following a clue of random word associations (except reality isn't written to make them right in the end because that's funny like in South Park).
If she gets pardoned, she loses 5th ammendment protections, as I understand it (because the pardon means anything said can't incriminate her). So it opens a can of worms that she might rather keep closed because then she could be kept in real prison for contempt for refusing to speak (which she will regardless of the legal consequences because those aren't the ones she fears the most).
Yeah, like I went down the conspiracy theory rabbit hole because of all the fuckery around 9/11 but then left the Alex Jones part of it when it became clear he didn't really gaf about changing anything, which meant he either didn't believe it or was working with them instead of against them (leaning more towards him just making shit up, though I did still believe that things weren't what they seemed with how society was run). The nail in the coffin for me was a very high production value video explaining what was going on that ended with a "but I have an answer, wait for the next video to find out!" And I'm thinking "wait, cliffhangers are engagement bait, not something you should say after talking about how the elites want to reduce the world population to like 100 million. He's just in it for the money, also how the fuck is he producing such high production quality videos?"
It wasn't aligned with either US politics "side" and subscribed to the "it's all an act, they are all buddy buddy behind closed doors" point of view, but I came out of it around the end of the Bush era, was happy to see Obama win but disappointed in how his actual presidency went (he seemed to have the resolve of a wet noodle when it came to actually fighting for the right things.
It was baffling as fuck when the conspiracy theory crowd was aligned behind fucking Donald Trump, of all people. Seemed like the poster boy for the elites rather than a saviour. I didn't watch a ton of the apprentice but none that I did see gave me any kind of positive impression of him. He just seemed like the asshole type of boss.
Pizzagate was also stupid as fuck (why the fuck would a pedophile ring for rich people operate out of the basement of a public building?). And gamergate was one of the lamest whiny things I've seen (though not sure how much of that came from the conspiracy side, it might have been going after a different audience).
Like I get how it feels going down that rabbit hole, things that were confusing can make more sense and there's truth at the core of it, but you need to continue using critical thought or you just end up becoming someone's tool. The enemy of your enemy is not necessarily your friend!
Yeah, the British invented concentration camps. Or at least used them in the Boer wars, I guess they probably weren't the first to gather people in camps to deal with some portion of them running a resistance.
The Nazi innovation was the gas chambers.
You want to cut Schrödinger's box in half? This kills the cat, unless the box is big enough for the cat to avoid the blade, in which case you've opened the box and the cat is probably going to need some convincing to get out from under whatever furniture it can find.
That's fair, it's more of a criticism of the NFL.
Or just do what I did where I have one of those wall mounted plastic channels with some of the cables hidden in it but two other cables just go to the TV without being hidden because the channel got full and I decided that I was done managing my cables for now.
The lady that owned this place before me had one of those in wall cable runs on a wall I didn't want to put my TV on. Not even sure how you get the cable out the other side, so I've left it there with the broken HDMI cable she left there, in case I want to run a different cable (so I can just attach it to the current one and pull it through). I probably should just patch the wall up though lol.
My guess is the loud bass vibrates dust particles that might clog up pores loose, or maybe helps with nutrient flow inside the plant. Like it's affected by sound not music.
Though music might be generally better than most loud sounds because it's one of the few cases where sound can be loud but isn't also associated with something that adds more dust to the air, which might even give a net negative result.