Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)B
Posts
0
Comments
2739
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • T'would be funny if this kind of demand drove the prices back up. Not to money laundering levels, but like to like $180 or something.

  • I'll see your grand and say 950 is still too high.

  • Lol I grew up in rural areas and remember my mom being excited about the northern lights and watching them from our front porch, wondering what was so special about some lights in the night sky, which was already full of lights.

    At least my daughter has been growing up in towns all her life so far and appreciated seeing them this past year, unlike the little shit I was.

  • Then fuck them all. The individuals involved, just "following orders" or giving them, should have all been charged with fraud.

  • Any ideas that can't be challenged are just dogmas. And a mindset of "any opposition to any of my ideas for any reason means you're an enemy" is just tribalism.

    It's just as stupid on the left as it is on the right. The world isn't black and white.

  • Or even better, get a mount that lets you pull the TV away from the wall and turn it because you might want to plug something in after mounting it.

  • Most of the danger is on the pulling out side, so it makes more sense to do the harder ones for the safer part. Plus, when you're parking, it's easier for others to predict what you're doing, whereas pulling out gives more opportunity for someone walking by the line of cars to be surprised. If you're pulling out forwards, it's trivial to see someone about to walk in your path. If you're backing out, you might not even be able to see someone who is 1s away from stepping in your path, especially if they are coming from your blind side.

  • And the AIs that generated the images won't give a shit at being called out when they are right, but the artists affected when they are wrong makes me wonder if they really do give a shit about the artists.

  • If you die from dehydration in the water wars, you're missing the point of the water wars. Don't stop charging until your thirst is quenched.

  • I think that tweet is from a time when most of twitter still thought musk was one of the good ones trying to save the world.

  • And if you absolutely must play one of their games, buy used console games, with the added bonus of keeping their kernel anti cheat shit off your PC.

  • Though that's not a property of phones, but of the media itself.

  • Lol strong "I don't want buyer's regret" energy from this guy. Or maybe "I am way out of my league when evaluating how good something is" with perhaps a dash of "boots are delicious".

    Like he literally mentions that he can hear water sloshing around in the frame somewhere but then immediately concludes that it'll probably go away on its own sometime in the future. I had a period in my life when I was like that. I consider it my "I had no fucking idea how naive I was or how things worked or how to take care of them" phase, and I was the last person anyone should have taken advice about anything from.

  • Can you give examples of things that were called genocide but actually weren't and just watered the word down?

  • He has investigated quite thoroughly many places where the sidewalk ends.

  • Oh hai Shel! How's your sex life been lately?

  • No, the exact % depends on how stable everything else is.

    Like a trivial example, if you have 3 programs, one that sets a pointer to a random address and tries to dereference it, one that does this but only if the last two digits of a timer it checks are "69", and one that never sets a pointer to an invalid address, based on the programs themselves, the first one will crash almost all the time, the second one will crash about 1% of the time, and the third one won't crash at all.

    If you had a mechanism to perfectly detect bit flips (honestly, that part has me the most curious about the OP), and you ran each program until you had detected 5 bit flip crashes (let's say they happen 1 out of each 10k runs), then the first program will have something like a 0.01% chance of any given crash being due to bit flip, about 1% for the 2nd one, and 100% for the 3rd one (assuming no other issues like OS stability causing other crashes).

    Going with those numbers I made up, every 10k "runs", you'd see 1 crash from bit flips and 9 crashes from other reasons. Or for every crash report they receive, 1 of 10 are bit flips, and 9 of 10 are "other". Well, more accurately, 1 of 20 for bit flip and 19 of 20 for other, due to the assumption that the detector only detects half of them, because they actually only measured 5%.

  • Who is talking about average consumers? We're not trying to market something here.

  • Improved overall system stability and data accuracy? With error correction, you can also push performance farther, since you can tolerate a certain amount of errors, instead of needing to aim for 0% error rate.