• ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not really horrifying. You’re misconstruing the astronomy meaning of “void” as your own colloquial understanding. It just means a place where there is meaningfully less matter than was predicted.

  • Geodad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    What if vacuum decay has happened, and we evolved on a planet that formed in the new vacuum state?

    That would account for the void we live in, as everything would be erased by the expansion of the new lower level vacuum.

  • kazerniel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    This really reminds me of Peter F Hamilton’s novels about the Void 🙃 (Void Trilogy and Chronicle of the Fallers)

  • obvs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Or we’re in a black hole, which would explain why everything seems to be moving away from us.

    • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      2 days ago

      Our galaxy cluster is in a void. There are still plenty of stars in our own galaxy that should be able to support life.

      Even if we were in a more densely populated area of the universe the next galaxy would still be millions of lightyears away.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Technically the nearest galaxy to us doesn’t have a name, just a designation, and is only like 10,000 stars, but it’s currently about 10,000-15,000 light years away, so we’re actually closer to the center of that galaxy than we are to our own, and possibly were closer to everything in that galaxy than we are the center of The Milky Way. The Milky Way is expected to absorb that galaxy into itself in the next few hundred million years though, IIRC.

        Also Andromeda and The Milky Way are already “touching” each other.

        • notsosure@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Let me put it another way: let’s presume that we haven’t been in contact for the last 1000years, how close by should other stars be to us, so that we were indeed contacted by extraterrestrials in the last 1000 years?

          • AbnormalHumanBeing@lemmy.abnormalbeings.space
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            The way I understand it, the whole “paradox” is more: If we aren’t the first culture-producing life, and if technological life is not an exceptionally rare occurence, and if technological life is persistent and not (almost) always fleeting - going by the age of other stars and their exoplanets in the galaxy, we would expect there to be signs of life visible in abundance (e.g. electromagnetic waves of clearly artificial origin as “background chatter”).

            The fact that this isn’t so, indicates that something about that assumption has to be wrong. What exactly, we cannot easily say, and theories go all the way from “Life like humanity really is exceedingly rare and needs very special circumstances and ‘luck’” to “technological life quickly evolves to a point, where it doesn’t produce any signs like that” to “there is a great filter still ahead of us, which extinguishes life wherever it arises” to “life behaves according to Dark Forest rules and actively tries to stay hidden”.

            But all of those are currently just wild speculation. The only thing certain is, that we have found none of the abundance of chatter we would expect from many worlds having had more time than our Earth to theoretically develop life akin to our own. And the most we so far have noticed are some sporadic signs that may hint at basic life, e.g. on K2-18b, but it is all in the “very fuzzy and uncertain” ballpark.

            • Zirconium@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              Two things to add

              1. we are quite early in the age of the universe so intelligent life that wants to communicate probably hasn’t formed yet
              2. we haven’t been looking quite that long and the stars are a big place
  • Cyrus Draegur@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    I could really use some scale on this image. Are these the galactic filaments of the laniakea supercluster?

    As it stands, Sol and the interstellar gas cloud it and a couple hundred other stars reside within are in the middle of a 100-parsec-wide void where stellar density drops to near zero which we have named “the local bubble” in the Orion Spur connecting two arms of the Milky Way right now.

    It is far from the first time a structure we’re part of is in the middle of nothing.