• MasterNerd@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Kinda weird that they’re calling it an OS, but ig they’re just trying to cater to the windows audience

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Neon is more of a testbed than a proper distro (they don’t actually even use that word).

        Is this “the KDE distro”?

        Nope. KDE believes it is important to work with many distributions, as each brings unique value and expertise for their respective users. This is one project out of hundreds from KDE.

        • rbits@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s a proper distro, that’s just saying it’s not THE official one

  • GustavoM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    “But can Linux install things via a single .exe file? HAHAH EAT IT NERD!”

    - 10’ish years ago past me, before discovering the magical wonders of the package manager

    • RQG@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I found since people are used to app stores, I’ve had a much easier time convincing people to try out Linux. My mom even said that she always wished her windows PC had a proper app store.

    • embed_me@programming.dev
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      With app images it’s easier than installing. Although the chmod step will deter the typical windows user

      • Kierunkowy74@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What chmod step?

        When I clicked on new app image, the OS told me, that program /name of app/ will be launched, I clicked “Continue” and it runs! No meddling with “chmod” or anything like that.

      • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        With file managers, for example in thunar, you can select Properties -> Permissions -> Allow this file to run as a program

  • glibg10b@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Windows 11 takes your money, gives you ads, sells your information and ignores your bug reports and feature requests

    KDE is free, ad-free and open to contribution

    I think we have a clear winner here

    • desconectado@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      But can it run proprietary software used in the industry? From Excel to Photoshop, if you are in a collaborative professional environment, you can’t run away from those, and don’t tell me you can use the alternatives in Linux, because no, you can’t. This is not linux fault, but it’s still an issue you can’t handwave.

      I love linux, but you can’t expect people to adopt it just because it’s objectively better than windows.

      • FangedWyvern42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wine can run most of those, not all. You can still dual boot Windows if you need to (VMs are an option, but they aren’t always the best).

        • desconectado@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, that’s what I do. Will I be able to convince my 60 yo colleague that had been using the same workflow for decades? No, not a chance.

      • aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        List of things to consider

        1. There are alternatives
        2. You can use wine
        3. You can run a windows VM and install it there
        4. Dual boot windows
        5. Microsoft has built a proprietary moat around their operating system. The reason why it’s hard to switch from Windows is by corporate design. A mix of early adoption, network effects, and just plain cold hard cash makes them dominate the operating system market. Of course it’s infeasible for your 60yo coworker to switch; but KDE presents an alternate reality, an opportunity, for people fed up with big tech’s bullshit. Yes, figure out how to run and use alternatives you fucking nut. Way to go disparaging countless volunteer hours spent on open source projects so that people like me can switch to linux.

        Comments like these make me irrationally angry. Why complain about open source software and give bad PR? It’s open source; contribute.

        • desconectado@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Read my other replies. 1 and 2 don’t really work, the performance of using wine, or the alternatives, is just not there, if you do amateur work, maybe that’s fine, but for professional collaborative work, good luck using freecad instead of autocad.

          Personally, I use 3 and 4, but you have to understand that the regular user is not going to go through that much hassle to set up a virtual machine.

      • cannache@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Meh I had a dual boot machine ages ago. Still here collecting dust. Basically I only switched to use the Linux for down time, movies, and study, most day to day tasks from engineering software to anything I considered important enough that you do not want the results hacked or broken I would use Windows.

        I think of modern machines kind of like a hammer. These days almost nobody actually remembers the guy who made the first hammer, or who discovered fire, but there’s a price tag for the bow, the paper and the hammer, not so much the making of the hammer, because the actual skill involved or required to learn about it has become challenged if not cheapened to the degree that there are now multiple paths to obtain or create a hammer, yet the benchmark quality of the hammer as well as the process for creation itself as a whole is now more of an authority than the actual original statue or monolith of “hammer man” himself.

        This is why I think the many flavours of Ubuntu including the many esoteric Linux distros are still interesting but still lack the diversity of use and specialization. The fact that whole blockchains are built for XYZ while sitting around pumped then dumped to trading at cents with no use goes to show how cloud computing systems and lower level computing is still very disconnected and becoming further thrown aside to uphold ponzi schemes.

        I’ll give you an example, more money is wasted on onlyfans per year than for people trying to use system XYZ for solving problem A, or curing cancer. Consider that to be one of the “good” reasons many men and women are so misogynistic, even without looking down on sex workers.

    • CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      But can it play Starfield with an Nvidia GPU? I originally had popos on my PC until Starfield came out, I had to switch to Windows to play.

    • allywilson@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is kinda how I feel about Windows these days. It’s interface, directory structure, shudder the registry, user specific apps (from MS Store or Winget), buttons being inserted into the menu bars on some apps, but not others, button sizes being different sizes, some parts still using the Metro interface. The whole thing either needs a re-write, or should be dropped and something new to replace it. Don’t even get me started on things like the eventvwr hanging for 20 seconds after it opens, event tracer API, their in-house abandonment of powershell modules once powershell was open sourced, Windows containers being a disaster, etc.

      • teatowel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The problem is that so much critical infrastructure around the world relies on ancient Windows software. I’m pretty sure their backwards compatibility is one of the reasons there’s so much inconsistency in Windows, and every iteration seems to just add more bloat on top.

    • mrcleanup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, but that old technology is what still lets me run a 13 year old version of Adobe creative suite. If that ever changes I will have to learn something new!

      • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We will perhaps never beat adobe but nowadays there are some amazing tools!

        … Which are developed for windows as well. Haha.

  • HouseWolf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    So basically ever since I first tried Windows 7 I held it as the “Gold standard” for desktop OS’s. Half my tweaks to Windows 10 were trying to get it as close to Win7 as I possibly could.

    When I finally start experimenting with Linux early this year KDE quickly got me to reconsider my “Gold standard” and finally switch my main machine fully to Linux.

    No regrets and certainly ain’t switching back even if Microsoft gave me updated Windows 7 with every extra feature I wanted back then.

    • Patch@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’ve been a Linux user for a decade and a half now, but still use Windows on my corporate laptops. Honestly, it’s baffling how Microsoft seem to consistently manage to miss the mark with the UI design. There’s lots to be said about the underlying internals of Windows vs Linux, performance, kernel design etc., but even at the shallow, end user, “is this thing pleasant to use” stakes, they just never manage to get it right.

      Windows 7 was…fine. It was largely inoffensive from a shell point of view, although things about how config and settings were handled were still pretty screwy. But Windows 8 was an absolutely insane approach to UI design, Windows 10 spent an awful lot of energy just trying to de-awful it without throwing the whole thing out, and Windows 11 is missing basic UI features that even Windows 7 had.

      When you look at their main commercial competition (Mac and Chromebook) or the big names in Linux (GNOME, KDE, plenty of others besides), they stand out as a company that simply can’t get it right, despite having more resources to throw at it than the rest of them put together.

      • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        To me it’s absurd how Microsoft gets beaten by a free desktop environment when windows is like their main product. They have billions of dollars. How do they manage to not do better?

        • cygnus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          windows is like their main product

          TBF it isn’t really - only about 12% of their revenue. It’s more of a means to lock people into their other products.

          • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Well, that’s the thing, it’s the core part of their entire business. The glue that sticks everything together. Or at least used to be until Azure.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Almost all my desktop gets used for anymore is gaming. The windows only anti cheat shit leaves me not messing with splitting what I boot up for.

  • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because I need Windows to run old C&C games. Get Generals world builder working on Linux and I’ll delete my dual boot

  • SGH Fan@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    And you can’t get de-crufted Win11 outside Europe! Another win for Plasma!

  • Synthead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    To be fair, forcing a bunch of software on the machine users own was never a good move, and in my opinion, not a new normal.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unlike Windows and MacOS, the Linux ecosystem is a lot more modular. For example, graphical user interfaces. There are a few types, ranging from ruthlessly simple tiling window managers to more complex desktop environments that more closely resemble the Windows or MacOS experience.

      Linux users may take their pick between about a dozen desktop environments (DEs), including Gnome, Cinnamon, Mate, xfce and LXQT.

      KDE (once standing for Kool Desktop Environment, now merely KDE) is a community/organization that produces open source software. They made Krita, a raster art program, KDENLIVE, a video editor, and many other such utilities. They also make the Plasma desktop environment, which is often referred to simply as “KDE” by distro maintainers. For example, you might download Fedora GNOME or Fedora KDE.

      KDE Neon is an operating system maintained by KDE which features the Plasma desktop.

    • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      KDE Plasma is an desktop environment.

      The kind of thing you interact outside of installed app/programs. Like the panels, window decorations (titles, close buttom, maximalize button), the way windows float and behave, system settings, etc.

      Unix systems (like Linux) are very modular and you can install different desktop environments if you want. And even within those desktops are modules, like you can install different “start menu” or file manager on KDE Plasma.

      • allywilson@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        raises pendantic finger Ah-hem, sorry, but KDE Plasma isn’t an OS. It’s a desktop environment. For an OS bundled/built-around Plasma then Kubuntu or KDE Neon are both Linux distributions that would better fit that description.

    • frostinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Well, if you bothered to read the text on the image, you would have found your answer.

        • frostinger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Oh sure, defending people who aren’t even willing to read the text of the post while also attacking the one who complains about that circumstance is better, right?

          • Dracula on a bike@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            Well, although usually it’s a good idea to read the original post first, in this instance the original post is at best misleading because it refers to Plasma as an “operating system” rather than a desktop environment.

            (Or for those who want to use even more precise terminology: its full name is either “Plasma Desktop” or “KDE Plasma Desktop”, because KDE also has some non-desktop environments such as Plasma Mobile and Plasma Bigscreen… none of which are as popular as Plasma Desktop, though, so usually Plasma Desktop is colloquially called just “Plasma”.)

            • frostinger@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I never said anything regarding the truth of the original posts claim; it’s just irritating when people start asking questions without even reading what was initially written.

  • HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Currently, dual booting Fedora and Windows 11 on my Asus gaming laptop, and I love Fedora, but it’s still not full sailing. Every other boot the wifi card doesn’t register and I have to reboot, others the OS freezes even though Grub doesn’t but nothing actually opens or closes, and lastly if the laptop is on battery and goes into hibernation, waking it up takes around 5-10 minutes. To add that gaming is still not as smooth as it is with windows, and I still have a use for Windows pOS.

    • Cinnamon3431@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      there seems to be a problem either with your specific install or with the compatibility of fedora and your hardware. None of what you listed is expected normal behavior. Maybe try reinstalling fedora or another distro, best of luck :)