When you’re deep into sweet sleep and the alarm wakes you up to go to work.
nsfw
I try to contribute to things getting better, sometimes through polite rational skepticism.
Disagreeing with your comment ≠ supporting the opposite side, I support rationality.
Let’s discuss to refine the arguments that make things better sustainably.
Always happy to question our beliefs.
When you’re deep into sweet sleep and the alarm wakes you up to go to work.
I think I know why.
The yellow object is actually your leaver liver.
Try to follow at least the WHO recommendation of 30 min of moderate exercise per day on average. Maybe you can consider this budget and balance it over your week depending on how busy you are.
On the surface for some people, it’s just voting for people who they think are not going to add restrictions on their daily lives, which comes way before ecology or the wellbeing of strangers, when you struggle. It’s the end of the month vs end of the world dilemma that right populism seems to utilize better than left populism.
Because things are getting more worrying on a global scale (economical slow down, ecological crisis and wars) and the usual human reflexes are conservatism and blaming the people who are different. I think progressive ideas rather spread in times of peace and prosperity, or after catastrophic events like WW2.
You just haven’t met your hole yet.
Get an accomplice to open a can of tuna.
Similar to Iran accusing women rights activists of being mentally ill. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwy42vxd99po
We also have the people complaining about things not being deep enough, how many years left?
What if your relationship partner got badly sick and becomes more of a weight than before? Should you disregard what you have lived together because it is accrued and leave them because it is going to get worse in the future?
Yes, that’s a good example for something that follows the rational use case. But let’s not take a toxic relationship extreme, I think in the case of a human relationship, the sunk cost may sometimes positivly contribute to the affection/intimacy/love. The sunk cost created memories, habits, foundations for a relationship that you cannot just suddenly ignore and only look at what comes in the future.
I think one must be careful about applying rational principles telling you to not listen to your emotions to subjects where reason doesn’t play the main role.
I wonder if the sunk cost fallacy is valid for a situation where emotions is a requirement, for example a human relationship.
I know it is a nickname, I am wondering if this could contribute.
I wonder if that contributes to “muscle memory”.
It could simply mean he checked his public social media and knew where he would go. Social “engineering” can be as simple as a web search.