johny@feddit.org to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 3 months agoRule 15feddit.orgimagemessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up1175arrow-down10
arrow-up1175arrow-down1imageRule 15feddit.orgjohny@feddit.org to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square26fedilink
minus-squareKacarott@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up25·3 months agoI’m curious what is going on with the spike at 50. Maybe related to lots of alcohol at big birthday celebrations?
minus-squareDeestan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up33·3 months agoAt 50 your hands finally heal from that injury at 45, so you can start punching walls at full strength again.
minus-squaremagic_lobster_party@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up14·3 months agoCould be rounding errors. At 50+, you don’t care about your exact age anymore
minus-squareSc00ter@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·3 months agoI assumed this chart is from hospital data, which does care about age
minus-squareSaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6·3 months agoThis seems to be a pretty small sample size, so i assume it’s just fluctuations that happened by pure chance
minus-squareWarl0k3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·3 months agoI think it’s a small numbers problem. I’d love to see the data they’re basing this from.
minus-squareunexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-23 months agoThe source is at the bottom of the picture. I would just assume its a US study, because its a study about idiots. The Y axis seems to be absolute numbers with the highest around 75 total. So yeah, small numbers.
I’m curious what is going on with the spike at 50. Maybe related to lots of alcohol at big birthday celebrations?
At 50 your hands finally heal from that injury at 45, so you can start punching walls at full strength again.
Could be rounding errors. At 50+, you don’t care about your exact age anymore
I assumed this chart is from hospital data, which does care about age
This seems to be a pretty small sample size, so i assume it’s just fluctuations that happened by pure chance
I think it’s a small numbers problem. I’d love to see the data they’re basing this from.
The source is at the bottom of the picture. I would just assume its a US study, because its a study about idiots.
The Y axis seems to be absolute numbers with the highest around 75 total. So yeah, small numbers.