The rich capitalists sure, but there are plenty of poor capitalists being fed misinformation, in order to maintain the status quo. And when it is the many vs the powerful few, then the more we have on our side the better
When I was a kid we had a couple dogs at different points, who were exactly like this, run at any chance.
Then I came to Germany, and the culture here (as compared to my family at least) is that they take walking the dog very seriously, like multiple times a day, every day. I was not used to this at all, but I haven't heard of dogs ever just running away since I've been here.
So it could just be that my dog-owning friends here are just very good trainers, but it seems like giving dogs lots and lots of opportunities to get outside, exercise and explore makes them a lot less likely to try escape on their own
Mate have you considered that it's possible for people to have different opinions about a movie than you, without them being brainwashed by the internet?
Have you considered that media/art is highly subjective and that even if a movie was internationally adored, it would still be valid for someone to not like the movie, and criticise it?
I'm all for a lively debate over the qualities of certain media, but your main point seems to be 'you just don't like it because you can't think for yourself', which is just a bullshit argument. It feels very similar to "you just don't believe in my god because you haven't prayed enough" or "you just don't like pickles because you can't cook well enough".
This is correct, though the initial drain might still be too much if there was literally a big exodus all at once. Maybe if the refugees from the US distributed fairly evenly across the various countries it could work?
It is insulting because it downplays the theory to the point of "to believe this would be absurd and stupid" which obviously has implications for its believers.
Imagine an atheist stated: "I am an atheist because intelligent design boils down to: if you leave your room empty for 6000 years, a magic fairy will appear and create the Taj Mahal". Can you see how this is not only just an outright false statement, but also making a mockery of those who believe?
If they are pathologically irresponsible, then I'm struggling to see how it is "evil" to get backup in the form of the law in enforcing that they act responsibly?
Of course, but this assumes I know roughly what the text will look like that I'm searching for. If I already know what it will look like, I'll use global search of course, but if all I know is that "at some point this element is put into the document" then I have no idea how that might actually happen. AI is just pretty good (ie succeeds sometimes) at generalising my words into a rough idea and searching for that.
I mostly use it as a code search tool, when dealing with large projects that I'm not very familiar with. Like I can ask "where is this component actually inserted into the web page" and it can sometimes point to a file and function. It doesn't always work of course, but when it does it can save a lot of time.
Is it already a thing for trans men to "donate" their boobs to trans women? Maybe that should be a thing. (Apologies in advance if this idea is very ignorant in some way)
I genuinely do not understand the problem with white spaces that people seem to have. Literally any well formatted code will use whitespace for indentation.
I imagine that if python syntax was the norm and then a C-style syntax language appeared, the same group of people would be complaining "curly brackets? Who thought that was a good idea?"
The rich capitalists sure, but there are plenty of poor capitalists being fed misinformation, in order to maintain the status quo. And when it is the many vs the powerful few, then the more we have on our side the better