Deestan

An economic bubble isn't when something is fake and ceases to exist when the bubble bursts.

We use the term when the market is inflated way beyond its value.

A bubble bursting is when people realize the market is inflated way beyond its value and pull out, leaving debt-ridden companies to their debt.

Some go bankrupt, stock prices fall, economy news outlets insist nobody could have predicted this, investments go elsewhere, people are laid off, and the people responsible fail upward to another grift.

Wait, you’re surprised it did what you asked of it?

No. Stop making things up to complain about. Or at least leave me out of it.

I tried the image of this real actual road collapse: https://www.tv2.no/nyheter/innenriks/60-mennesker-isolert-etter-veiras/12875776

I told ChatGPT it was fake and asked it to explain why. It assured me I was a special boy asking valid questions and helpfully made up some claims.

The devs were not told what needed to change even after asking, so they tried to remove anything that they suspected could be taken the wrong way, asked for reconsideration or clarification, but receive no response.

The game being banned for a misunderstood piece of placeholder concept art in a Steam approval preview build, which was both removed, and explained. Then Valve refusing to reconsider it and rejecting all attempts to clarify their objections.

Looks like it has triggered someone's "we can't be seen backing down!" reflex at Valve

The fucking lunacy of the AI bros he lists as examples...

Heyyyy! Who switched the labels on the pods?

laugh track

Now who's going to clean up Gene?

laugh track

And explain it to his family?

laugh track intensifies

Rob, can you show up to Gene's wedding pretending to be him while we figure this out?

Please step into the Science to be cleansed, human

Some Christmas gifts I WANTED TO BUY two weeks ago, but saw that they had jacked up the prices to have "sale" on black friday and so had to just wait.

Be careful. Don't get too close to the psychosis machine.

The energy requirements for storing one ton of co2 are many many times higher than the energy gained from generating one ton of co2 (by oil, gas, coal or biofuel).

So each MWh spent "storing co2" would be ten times more efficient if used to offset oil extraction to get one MWh less out in the first place.

This is wasteful greenwashing. If it wasn't, we'd have broken physics on the level of making perpetual motion machines.

I have briefly scanned the headline and am ready to share my immediate opinion on this significant political issue that I did zero research on. Where do I put it?

Here's an expensive thing!

What value does it have?

...you figure it out!

I am not impressed.

:o

The lemmyverse isn't huge, but broad.

Unless you give some examples, people are probably going to respond based on what they saw somewhere else than where you were thinking of.

My best attempt at an answer is that lemmy has fewer long-term well behaving residents, so people coming from other platforms because they kept being banned for bad behavior or just kept not getting along, stick out more.

Sir, this is a Wendy's

This reads like OpenAI's fanfic on what happened, retconning decisions they didn't make, things they didn't (couldn't!) do, and thought that didn't occur to them. All indicating that the possibility to be infinitely better is not only possible, but is right there for their taking.

For the one in April, engineers created many new versions of GPT-4o — all with slightly different recipes to make it better at science, coding and fuzzier traits, like intuition.

Citation needed.

OpenAI did not already have this test. An OpenAI competitor, Anthropic, the maker of Claude, had developed an evaluation for sycophancy

This reality does not exist: Claude is trying to lick my ass clean every time I ask it a simple question, and while sycophantic language can be toned down, the behavior of coming up with a believable positive answer for whatever the user has, is the foundational core of LLMs.

“We wanted to make sure the changes we shipped were endorsed by mental health experts,” Mr. Heidecke said.

As soon as they found experts who were willing to say something else than "don't make a chatbot". They now have a sycophantically motivated system with an ever growing list of sticky notes on its desk: "if sleep deprivation then alarm", "if suicide then alarm", "if ending life then alarm", "if stop living then alarm", hoping to have enough to catch the most obvious attempts.

The same M.I.T. lab that did the earlier study with OpenAI also found that the new model was significantly improved during conversations mimicking mental health crises.

The study was basically rigged: it used 18 known and identified crises chat logs from ChatGPT - meaning the set of stuff OpenAI just had hard coded "plz alarm" for, and thousands of "simulated mental health crises" generated by FUCKING LLMs meaning they only test if ChatGPT can identify mental health problems in texts where it had written its own understanding of what meantal health crisis looked like. For fucks sake of course it did perfectly in guessing its own card.

TLDR; bullshit damage control

I am scared of the "TRY ME" button in front of the smiling, plier-wielding elf

Business idiots are killings jobs. Generative AI is just their excuse to do it and threat to make people feel more replacable.

It's on the verge of pedantic, but I feel it important that we blame people for lying and causing harm, and not let them hide behind the imagined inevitability of tech and progress.

Generative AI can't replace shit, but the lie that they can and do, is the weapon wielded more than the tech itself.