Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)W
Posts
10
Comments
2538
Joined
2 yr. ago

Just a smol with big opinions about AFVs and data science. The onlyfans link is a rickroll.

$|>>> Onlyfans! <<<|$

  • Lmfao no, seriously? I did miss that.

  • And in at least one canadian one, who if anyone appears to be the party with the true "flaw" in their security (but it's really just a systemic weakness, and sadly one I expect will be ended because of this dickhead's meddling). It's actually a fascinating story - he was given the ability to set up credentials as part of his job (or was able to re-submit himself for a second set somehow, I'm reading conflicting accounts of exactly how it was done), then just set up an alternative identity for himself that persisted after he left. As far as I understand it the identity was legitimate, it was just never removed from the system so he simply continued to use it. Probably the most interesting thing is that it's so common for pilots and flight attendants to fly inter-carrier, I would not have expected it to be as abusable as it turns out to be.

  • Sorry, my criticism was of the article, not OP. Unless OP writes the headlines for the guardian, in which case it was indeed for them.

    Armies have always wargamed, but the difference is that wargames rely on the "hard" factors - things that are quantifiable. How do you position tanks, how do you ensure supply deliveries, how do you convoy ships, how do you ensure pilots have adequate sleep, how do we coordinate communication in disaster response, things of that nature.

    What they're describing here is entirely about the unquantifiable "soft" factors - how will a population respond to actions taken by a government, and that's (despite what the CIA would like you to believe) entirely the realm of guesswork. Informed, authoritativly stated guesswork, but at it's heart its still just sitting around a table with a bunch of people and role-playing what you think will happen. Without some expansion on why the results of this have merit it's not something we should be taking seriously, which is why its disappointing the article didn't include any explanation of the process or expand on the credibility of the "high level" simulation.

  • This scenario closely mirrors one explored in an October 2024 tabletop exercise

    It's a little bit disingenuous to leave out that the conclusions here are taken from what are basically the worlds most boring homebrew D&D sessions - I've been a part of similar exercises, and while they can have value, that value is incredibly limited in scope. It's disappointing to see the guardian reporting on such dubious claims as though they are an accurate simulation, without giving any background on why they should be considered as such.

  • I feel like that makes slightly too much sense to be something trump would propose. At the very least, he'd have to be aware of them not being the same place, which is already giving him too much credit.

  • I don't even want to consider what he might be saying in two weeks, speculation like that brings only madness...

    edit: Wait did you mean he's saying the tariffs are happening in two weeks because if so I'm dumb and you're funny.

  • Tune in tomorrow for when trump announces that greenland tariffs are totally happening!

  • News @lemmy.world

    Trump says he won't proceed with tariffs over ownership of Greenland

    www.nbcnews.com /politics/trump-administration/live-blog/live-updates-trump-davos-greenland-europe-canada-air-force-one-rcna254575
  • They’re not posting to hurt the marginalized, they don’t care if they ever see it.

    The method they're choosing to do this is to mock the marginalized. When you're resorting to "the end justifies the means" to excuse behavior, it's probably time to take a step back and really look at what you're saying.

  • Don't get too excited folks, Nadella's never been right about anything before...

  • Edit: Nope, I'm already doing that, don't need your help there champ.

  • If you've got plenty, sure seems like you could share some then.

    ::: spoiler Side note: I have legitimately no idea what

    It solely lies what legislation you praxis in the rape ending litigation.

    Is supposed to mean. That isn't comprehensible english.

  • Not migrating to a 40% rape country.

    Big "You can't fire me, I quit!" energy with this one.

    𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓽 ✨: hang on that's a list of cases that were heard by the US supreme court, you just have no idea what you're talking about at all do you?

  • "Must" isn't in that sentence either. So you don't have any suggestions for how to end rape, then?

  • Are you seeing an edit indicator on another one of my comments? Because I'm not, but you're on a different instance so maybe it's displaying differently.

    Regardless though, everyone can see you just edited your comments to refer to my initial comment. Why are you trying to pretend like you didn't do that?

  • What?? Everyone can see the edit indicator on your posts, though. edit: I think the cutoff is 5 minutes now? I'm attempting to get it to show up on this comment to demonstrate to you what it looks like from another user's perspective and it's not working.

    Here's what your comments look like to someone else:

    edit 2: testedit 3: Yeah, it's 5 minutes for it to show up on lemmy. Not sure how it works with Piefed (or how other frontends implement the edited tag)

  • Might I suggest more impact eliminating this issue more effectively?

    That's what I'm asking you though. This whole discussion stemmed from your comment here - in which you didn't make any suggestions.

  • That's a link to the modlog, and... no? I didn't?

  • No that's what I'm asking you...

  • FoodPorn @lemmy.world

    (I made) Teriyaki-glazed tuna steak!

  • FoodPorn @lemmy.world

    First time making Liege waffles - stuck a little bit but turned out wonderful in spite of that!

  • Shitty Food Porn @lemmy.ca

    May I offer m'lady a chalice of the finest Dew?

  • FoodPorn @lemmy.world

    It's basic, but is there anything in the world more satisfying to dice than green onions?

  • Lemmy Shitpost @lemmy.world

    Mental health? In this economy?

  • FoodPorn @lemmy.world

    Fresh loaf of Foccia! (Turned out beautifully, if I do say so myself)

  • FoodPorn @lemmy.world

    Garlic knots (from leftover sourdough pizza dough)

  • FoodPorn @lemmy.world

    Chicken, spinach and parmesan omelette!

  • FoodPorn @lemmy.world

    Today in "stupid food I made" I give you: Thin-sliced, pan fried burrito with Tamagoyaki eggs and a sweet chili vinaigrette.