Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)W
Posts
9
Comments
2508
Joined
2 yr. ago

Just a smol with big opinions about AFVs and data science. The onlyfans link is a rickroll.

$|>>> Onlyfans! <<<|$

  • Yeah okay, that makes sense. Thank you! What a weird point to grab onto then when the "reform NATO" one already works so well with distancing from the US and doesn't further UK isolationism.

  • The UK should consider expelling the US from British military bases, the leader of the Green party has said, as he advocated leaving NATO [...]

    Is the UK actually seeking to leave NATO? From everything I've seen this seems like it would be a deeply unpopular move even with support for distancing the UK from the US. Am I missing something?

  • They're adding together both chambers - Commons (650 MPs) and Lords (822 Peers). 2 greens in lords, 4 in commons.

  • They banned me from StableWerewolves and that doesn't even have any posts for me to have downvoted. And for the more active ones, I can't find another post I've interacted with in StableDiffusionWitches (or the dragons one, or several others I was banned from). Unless there's more there that I'm not seeing I literally was banned from SDWitches because of a single downvote (from seven months ago).

    I'm not saying "don't ban the trolls", that's obviously fine - someone downvoting the majority of your posts across your communities isn't interacting in good faith. But you can't honestly say I'm a troll, I've got what four downvotes accross all of them, of which two might be federation issues? Should I really be getting mass-banned with a "no you're the problem for not liking us enough >:( " message?

    If I'm a troll I'm the worst troll ever, and that's why I'm saying those mods are being hypersensitive - even in the best case that it's not just a federation issue with the downvotes and I really did do it, I've gone seven months with four interactions. They need to tune whatever method they're using to decide who's a troll, because if that is the threshold they're clinging to to justify how persecuted they are that is incredibly unhealthy. Even r/conservative, the biggest exclusionary echo-chamber I can think of, is more lenient with their bans than the StableDiffusion[Family] mods are being. Are they really so much more reviled than actual unapologetic nazis that they need to be this hypervigilant?

    Maybe the reason they get people DMing them isn't just that they run communities devoted to AI slop (and it's incredibly trendy to do things like call it "AI slop" right now), but also that they're banning people from communities with no content, for no good reason, and with a very rude victim-blaming message while they do it? And that's a shitty thing to do?

  • You downvoted the comment where I explain that I think there's a technical issue so it's not like you can claim you didn't see it. And on top of that, their comment even demonstrates they banned me over a single downvote - are you really going to pretend like you can claim a victory here? The instance admin themselves just came in and demonstrated my criticism was absolutely correct.

  • So... they literally do ban from a community over one vote? Assuming your examples are right, I've interacted with StableDiffusionWitches once and now I've been banned.

    Honestly, is the tool they're using broken, or more likely just... not very good? Regardless something funky is going on, because you're accusing me of having downvoted a post which you can see on my UI doesn't show as having been downvoted - the other downvote in Stable Diffusion Art also just doesn't show as something I've downvoted. Does the tool not account for un-downvoting content, maybe? I occasionally bump downvotes while scrolling, which I then undo - but I don't even know if that's what happened here.

    It doesn't really matter though - this is absurd behavior for a community to be engaging in. Even accepting the records are right, two of the four votes I've been condemned over were from seven months ago. That's not "downvote troll" behavior, and it's not even indicative of behavior from someone who cares enough that they need to "tailor their feed."

    Again, I didn't care about them at all until I was banned from there. Now, I think they're hypersensitive and need to be coddled so they don't have to accept that their content is wildly unpopular with the wide userbase, and that you're trying to defend that behavior with the weakest possible argument you could make for... some reason. Tell them to tone it down, maybe? Because this is ridiculous?

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Nah, I meant what I said and while it's very mildly ambiguous, it's not so ambiguous that you get to tell someone to kill themselves over it. You just misinterpreted my comment and decided to be extremely shitty to me because of it.

  • Mostly because its an absolutely incredible satire of the genre

  • Not what I might normally call "subtle", no...

  • Top recommended video:

  • Where'd they even find shelf-putty-uppy screws that short? Seriously those sound adorable.

  • Yeah, that indeed seems to be the whole premise of the joke.

  • Isn't he directly saying that she's smoking, though? It seems like from her perspective he just used a pickup line about something he thought she was doing, she corrected him and (presumably) started to mention how it's way healthier than cigarettes, and he noped out.

    Not really anything wrong here, just a bit cringe overall.

  • ohhhh wait, have you spent this whole time thinking I'm saying vaping is something you should pick up? Because no, I meant that its healthier than cigarettes, and you should really transition to vaping if you still smoke cigs.

  • Sure, and theyre abusing that tool. I just went through every single post in that community for the last year+ and the only other interaction I have had with their content was here, where I upvoted a post I didn't realize was AI:

    These mods are pretty clearly just out of control, and it is embarrassing that db0 is allowing them to act like this. It's ridiculous they presume they should be allowed to force their slop on /all browsers but they also get to mass ban people who didn't care prior to ever being prevented from interacting with them over literally a single downvote.

  • Wait, where'd I say it was healthy?

  • It's almost like you can just go check and see that it was literally just one:

  • For one bad post? I don't even mind the content generally, I just didn't like that post and they're so sensitive they couldn't handle it. That's really not on me if one downvote is all it takes to trigger them to ban me from five different communities.

  • FoodPorn @lemmy.world

    (I made) Teriyaki-glazed tuna steak!

  • FoodPorn @lemmy.world

    First time making Liege waffles - stuck a little bit but turned out wonderful in spite of that!

  • Shitty Food Porn @lemmy.ca

    May I offer m'lady a chalice of the finest Dew?

  • FoodPorn @lemmy.world

    It's basic, but is there anything in the world more satisfying to dice than green onions?

  • Lemmy Shitpost @lemmy.world

    Mental health? In this economy?

  • FoodPorn @lemmy.world

    Fresh loaf of Foccia! (Turned out beautifully, if I do say so myself)

  • FoodPorn @lemmy.world

    Garlic knots (from leftover sourdough pizza dough)

  • FoodPorn @lemmy.world

    Chicken, spinach and parmesan omelette!

  • FoodPorn @lemmy.world

    Today in "stupid food I made" I give you: Thin-sliced, pan fried burrito with Tamagoyaki eggs and a sweet chili vinaigrette.