• 17 Posts
  • 395 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: June 7th, 2023
  • SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.mltomemes@lemmy.world•Damn she had AI write it
    18·
    6 days ago

    i assume hand written, as that is excessive even for ai. im gonna test it tho

    edit:

    Prompt: write me a prargraph talking about how em dashes are not a defibitive sign of ai. use ecessive amounts of em dashes

    result: Sure—here’s a paragraph absolutely drowning in em dashes—because why not?

    People often claim—incorrectly—that excessive use of em dashes is some kind of definitive sign of AI-generated text—but that assumption falls apart quickly—because human writers—especially those with a flair for dramatics or a tendency toward fragmented, breathless prose—have been peppering their sentences with em dashes for centuries—long before algorithms were even a concept—and while it’s true that language models sometimes favor em dashes—they’re hardly unique in that regard—many contemporary authors, bloggers, and even journalists lean on them heavily—for rhythm, for emphasis, for parenthetical asides, for style—so to say “em dashes equal AI” is like saying “ellipses equal laziness”—a statement that’s catchy but hopelessly reductive—and if anything, this overgeneralization itself is more indicative of shallow analysis than of any deep understanding of writing—human or artificial.

    Want me to make an even more over-the-top version—like so dense with em dashes it almost collapses into chaos? Or keep it just slightly unhinged but still readable?

    answer: yes

    response: Alright—here’s the full chaos version—an unhinged wall of em dashes—designed to overwhelm, confuse, and yet—somehow—still make its point:

    The idea—that em dashes—those long, elegant, interruptive strokes—are a definitive fingerprint of AI—is laughable—no, it’s absurd—because human writers—yes, real, living, breathing writers—have always loved them—used them—abused them—even worshipped them—as tools for rhythm—for drama—for sudden shifts—for inserting thoughts within thoughts within thoughts—and while AI—sure—might lean on them occasionally—it’s no different than a poet—or a novelist—or an over-caffeinated blogger hammering out a late-night post—filling their paragraphs with dashes—em dashes—everywhere—because it feels natural—feels conversational—feels alive—and if we start declaring any style quirk—a dash, a semicolon, a penchant for adverbs—as “proof” of machine authorship—then we risk erasing the messy, chaotic, wonderfully unpredictable reality of human prose—a reality full of contradictions—full of excesses—full of writers who don’t give a damn about rules—and that, ironically enough, is something no algorithm has quite mastered—not yet—not ever—so no—the em dash is not a smoking gun—it’s just a mark—and marks are made by hands—human or otherwise.

    Want me to go even further—like a version where every single comma and period is replaced with an em dash? Or one that’s so self-aware it starts mocking its own overuse of dashes?

  • SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.ml•It's even infecting the wider lemmy network!
    11·
    12 days ago

    you are right, cause my worldview doesn’t matter. i see thibgs i attribute to bots, so i assume bot.

    and what i wad referring to in my previous comment was you saying i couldn’t have a well thought out world view, which -assuming we have the same- would mean you don’t either. yet unlike you, i dont start defending everything that resembles my world view. i explained in previous comments why i thought it was a bot, yet you still assume that i just cant handle a diffrent opinion (which you have as flimsy of evidence as i have that they are a bot btw.)