And the reason I was ID’d as a dangerous car thief was a simple data error made 2,000 miles away in California, creating an edge case within an edge case that Flock’s AI camera network was unable to handle
And the reason I was ID’d as a dangerous car thief was a simple data error made 2,000 miles away in California, creating an edge case within an edge case that Flock’s AI camera network was unable to handle
While I agree that Flock sucks, using alternate timelines as arguments isn’t working
Everyone is all ears for solutions: https://www.news5cleveland.com/news/local-news/we-follow-through/clevelands-flock-safety-cameras-set-to-go-dark
I don’t think we’re using alternate timelines enough. This is an example of a situation where nobody involved wanted to be in that situation, and it happened anyway. Who had something they could’ve done differently that wouldn’t have brought that situation to a Kohl’s parking lot? Maybe instead of reviewing a range rover he should’ve been reviewing a rental Nissan Versa?
Right now Flock can have as absolutely shit of an AI as they want and there’s no incentive to improve it. False positives don’t cost them anything. And P.S. the video data isn’t ever going away.
Nothing is working dawg