Already I did not like those projects of putting a game into another game because all those I saw were made with AI, but it’s worse than I thought

  • TwilightKiddy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Security through obscurity has never been considered to be a proper protection measure by anyone with at least a spec of security engineering background. If LLMs destroy proprietary software, it will just make our incredibly short list of good things done with LLMs a bit longer.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s quietly hilarious that people can sincerely anticipate the end of closed-source software and still go ‘ugh, I guess that’s a positive.’ Especially from the same crowd still grumbling about copyright.

      • TwilightKiddy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t “guess” it’s a positive, I’m very much certain it’s a positive.

        What are you implying with “grumbling about copyright”? Copyright is a juridical question, source code availability is a technical one. They live in completely different dimentions. If what you want to say is “but DRM software!”, then look at the whole media piracy scene and see how well that works as a protection measure.