D•Scribe
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 days ago

Tinder takes action against AI profiles by making users scan eyes for “proof of humanity”

www.dexerto.com

external-link
message-square
106
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • nottheonion@lemmy.world
374
external-link

Tinder takes action against AI profiles by making users scan eyes for “proof of humanity”

www.dexerto.com

Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 days ago
message-square
106
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • nottheonion@lemmy.world
Tinder takes action against AI profiles by making users scan eyes for “proof of humanity” - Dexerto
www.dexerto.com
external-link
Tinder is rolling out a new way for users to prove they’re real as AI-generated profiles continue to flood dating apps.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • D1re_W0lf@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    7 days ago

    “Let’s partner with a bot maker to prevents bots. This is not about collecting and selling user data. No, not at all” 🙄😑

  • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    7 days ago

    The Match Group-owned platform is partnering with World, the identity verification project by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, to introduce a system that uses iris scans to confirm a person is human.

    🤮

    • atrielienz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      7 days ago

      You want some fuk? Give us you biometric data!

      • ptu@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        😏

    • trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      Well that was a quick decision to delete my account

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      As soon as it mentioned eye scanning I assumed Sam Altman was involved. Didn’t he have that world coin thing where he scanned a bunch of eyes in impoverished countries?

      • demonsword@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        IIRC altman stiffed the Brazillians who scanned their irises in his scam, never paid a dime

    • Danitos@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      They give you the poison to sell you the cure.

    • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      In 6 months chatgpt 37.5 bots will now be able to recreate human irises

  • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 days ago

      Also in Minority Report, they do the whole eye scanning thing.

  • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    7 days ago

    What if I train a generative AI on thousands of images of iris’s and start generating fake ones?

    • Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      7 days ago

      Gee I wonder where one might get a database full of iris scans?

      • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        There’s gotta bee a good enough example set somewhere for research already

    • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 days ago

      OpenAI is the one running this “verification”. That’s exactly what they’ll be doing with the data

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 days ago

    Oh, people didn’t like the idea of giving their ID to third parties? Let’s move up to irreplaceable body parts. Next step: your fucking blood. Good luck declaring that one stolen when the database inevitably leaks.

    • Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      That reminds me of my ex, she was willing to give her physical address and phone number to anyone who asked, but not her email address, because of security concerns.

  • fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

  • SlippiHUD@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    7 days ago

    Why are they so insistant of iris scans? What are they getting out of it?

    • Siegfried@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Data to sell

    • leoj@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      make the AIs better by scanning thousands of human eyes lol

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      Because it’s “futuristic” and fascists are obsessed with that image

      • frostysauce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        No, it is because it is a unique identifier for them to collect and sell.

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          You know it’s most likely not an either/or thing. It’s most likely both.

          Fascists are very obsessed with image. It’s a big chunk of why the Nazis hired Hugo Voss to design the SS uniforms

          • frostysauce@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            Fair enough.

    • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      Could be unique like a fingerprint. Might be able to crosscheck this with other biometric data, like when a picture is taken at airports or border crossings.

      • otacon239@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Those fast track lines at the airport I recently read somewhere is supplied by a private entity, which means all those face scans are just added into a database for future surveillance.

        • LostCarcosan@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          You can say no to the face scan at those. The TSA agents don’t get paid enough to try to convince you otherwise and just say “okay.” The amount of people just willingly scanning their faces for whatever nefarious bullshit they want to scan faces for does not surprise me, but does cause me dismay

      • VoodooAardvark@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        deleted by creator

    • usrtrv@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      To keep people without eyes off their platform.

  • you_are_dust@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Haven’t used Tinder in a few years, but I guess I won’t be using it in the future. I’m not scanning my eye to use what is arguably the worst dating app.

  • PerfectDark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    Maybe it is finally time for open-source(ish) dating to make an impact!

    (It won’t. I tried it a couple years back and it is a ghost town!)

    • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s probably a Goldilocks zone thing where too few prevents it from working, and too many will inevitably be overrun by bots and scanners.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 days ago

    hey, you can’t make bot profiles! that’s our thing!

  • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 days ago

    What stops a human running Tinder bot profiles from scanning their eyeball, getting the badge, and continuing on their merry way of running the bot?

    • BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      If you can limit things to one bot per person, it will solve the problem. One bot per person is equivalent to traditional cat fishing.

      • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I guess also they have an eye print that will identify the scammer if they’re ever caught.

    • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I guess the have to be somewhat unique like a face.

      • village604@adultswim.fan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Your iris is as unique as a fingerprint.

        • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          So… Not unique

        • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          It’s it easy to generate fake fingerprints though?

  • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 days ago

    So what’s the dating scene like for bots anyway? What do they do on a first date? Do they show eachother their prompt?

    • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      They are scammers who try to manipulate you into buying worthless crypto, or blackmail you after you send “your girlfriend” intimate pictures or videos.

  • Dogiedog64@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 days ago

    No thanks, I’m out

  • LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    Oh I just watched a video on this the other day, apparently scammers (like the types who do romance scams, pretending to be a gorgeous guy, then taking all your money) are getting around this security function.

    They upload all stolen pics of a gorgeous guy (probably exists for women versions too) then there’s one picture of them, because they have to have one pic of themselves to get the verification tick. But that one pic is obscured, like a face on a billboard or add on a poster on a street. And then tinder verifies the whole account, regardless of the other pics. I forget, it’s either bumble or hinge, I think it was bumble, deletes all the pics that don’t look like you, after verification, so those were sites that block that scam.

    That’s an aside from ai profiles. There does need to be something to protect users from scammers. I couldn’t ever speak for what the best verification option is, myself.

    • TheOakTree@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      I watched the video yesterday! Here are links for those interested:

      Something very weird is happening on Tinder (YouTube)

      Something very weird is happening on Tinder (Invidious mirror)

      • LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        That was really well done. Where he went through and tested the verification process, to see how far he could push it. That bit was really eye opening.

  • GreenBottles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 days ago

    This stuff is gonna fail hard

Technology@lemmy.world

technology@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.world

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


  • @L4s@lemmy.world
  • @autotldr@lemmings.world
  • @PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks
  • @wikibot@lemmy.world
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 3.72K users / day
  • 8.85K users / week
  • 15.2K users / month
  • 30.8K users / 6 months
  • 53 local subscribers
  • 84.3K subscribers
  • 15.7K Posts
  • 619K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • L3s@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • Technopagan@lemmy.world
  • L4sBot@lemmy.world
  • L3s@hackingne.ws
  • UI: unknown version
  • BE: 0.19.17
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org