• harsh3466@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    164
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Translation:

    “Fuck you for not replacing your perfectly fine and still working 10 year old machine and making our line go up more. We’re gonna do our best to brick it because we want all of your money.”

    Fuck capitalism. I will (and have been) doing my absolute to avoid buying any kind of physical device that requires an app to function

    • __init__@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      4 months ago

      I will (and have been) doing my absolute to avoid buying any kind of physical device that requires an app to function

      Same. It’s becoming more difficult every day.

      • FMEEE@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        And that’s so sad. There are a lot of (mainly Elderly people) who don’t even have a smartphone who now often can’t use the most basic stuff necessary because it needs an app.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          A lot of this stuff is only useful if you have money, anyway. And poverty rates among the elderly have been climbing since the Housing Crash of '08

          • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I’ve said this before, I’m going to say it again: people with money spend it to save time.

            Managing 2FA, software updates, account signin, device pairing, billing, privacy policy updates, cookie notices… This shit does not save people time. It does the complete opposite.

            These products are not built for consumers. These products are purely anticompetitive schemes, propping up crappy business models, trying to cash in on the data harvesting gold rush.

            • experbia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              These products are not built for consumers.

              they’re often built for investors. they are feasible enough products that some people will even buy them, so you get investors. then, the thing is always just “one more issue we need to fix” away from “mass adoption”, “for real this time”… to keep milking the investors as long as possible.

            • primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              I’ve been screaming this at the top of my lungs for 20 years, and oh my god the “I told you so”'s I get to say now feel SO good.

              i mean, I don’t have any friends anymore, so mostly im just calling up people who hate me now and saying “I told you so”, but, like I DID, so, worth.

              I mean, not, like, ‘worth’ in the sense that anything in my life works or wasn’t torn apart by my adherence to materialism and avoidance of dark patterns, but, like, you know, feels good for a few minutes when they haven’t changed their number.

    • primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 months ago

      if I see something requires an app, no matter how good it is otherwise. the product is dead to me. I know it is, effectively, going to break within a year or two.

        • primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          you never know for sure until you try though, so if it requires an app, it’s dead to me and I don’t trust anything else the company makes.

          if it has an API i get very wet very fast.

          • linearchaos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            About two phone changes ago I never reinstalled the anova app.

            It’s like pressing the buttons on top of the cooker with extra steps.

            • primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              yeah there are apps I want on my phone, but if anything says ‘there is an app’ I’m instantly averse.

              even the things I do want phone apps for, I have to browse on fdroid because default options are all terrible. basic shit like file browsers and media players in commercial OS’s are just, like, vile and do not function. even if I didn’t care about the endoscopes they try to snake up every orifice, they are deliberately nonfunctional.

          • kjaeselrek@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            That’s fair, but the point I was trying to make was that I have tried and, for the one I’ve got at least, the app isn’t required. I’m not trying to defend them or anything, I just thought it was worth mentioning.

            Tbh I’m kinda glad it doesn’t have an API, because I’d end up wasting a lot of time playing with it haha.

      • TheIllustrativeMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m getting that same way.

        Currently trying to chase down some automatic sun shades that don’t need an app to do time-based cycles. Shouldn’t be this hard, but every band wants you to use absolute garbage apps.

        • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Switchbot (hardware) and home assistant (controlling server) might fit your needs. It still would require an app, but home assistant is self hosted and is a fantastic automation platform. It won’t be as smooth as an all in one setup, but I find the tinkering is half the fun.

          I’ve installed so many hardware items that are either “appless” and are controlled by home assistant or home assistant is compatible and replaced the app. Absolutely worth it IMO. I have been able to make a full self hosted/controlled and offline functional smart house.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, I need to start being better about this. It’s a shame because I bought my joule sous vide because I like the simplicity and ability to monitor and program it remotely (helpful when cooking for 5-6h). App stopped working properly and now they’ve been purchased by breville and if I want to use it I need to switch and I’m guessing it won’t be long before they start to drop functionallity or require some sort of subscription. There are things like this where the app is much more than a gimmick. But it sucks to have some company pulling the strings of what you can or can’t do with your own hardware.

    • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I mean it is shitty still, but people with an old device and an account already are unaffected, plus the old devices like the one I have is completely operable offline. I’ve not connected it to WiFi except when I first got it to check the app out.