• 0 Posts
  • 246 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 2nd, 2023

help-circle


  • This answer assumes a state of affairs where everyone living from paycheck to paycheck should be normalized. I think this way of thinking buries a much deeper issue which is that owners of capital continue to squeeze non-owners of capital.

    Let’s assume we address that problem and ask the question again.

    I would say, that choosing a riskier but higher average source of compensation is a perfectly reasonable, personal choice for someone to make.


  • Let me play devil’s advocate: who gets to say what is a human rights violation? And I am not talking about what happens on the ground, so put your pitchforks away. I’m talking about how it is defined in international law–what happens when a country like Russia and puppets defines gay rights as a human rights violation.

    Point is, there is absolutely no way to get states to agree on any of this and if it was binding, then it is a power that can and will be abused for geopolitical points.

    I think principles of law are only enforceable at a state level. Almost by definition of sovereignty. Above the state level, there can only be treaties and geopolitics.



  • Congratulations, you’ve discovered the only negotiating power consumers have ever and will ever have: voting with your wallet.

    Let’s normalize real customer loyalty again by sending a strong message that continued business is not to be taken for granted.