Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S
Posts
0
Comments
405
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • You crave salt and fat because your body needs a little bit of these things to survive, but finding salt and fat out in nature is really really hard, so those cavemen that liked the taste of salty or fatty foods enough to make the extra effort to find those foods were more likely to survive to be your ancestors and you inherited that behaviour. That's why you like McDonald's, it's full of the salt and fat that is hard to obtain if your diet consists of mostly roots and mushrooms and leaves.

    McDonalds is bad for you because it's unnaturally full of salt and fat. Far, far more than your body needs and far more than your cavemen ancestors would have eaten naturally. Especially if you eat McDonald's often. Too much of anything turns that thing into a poison.

    McDonald's has only been around a generation or two. That's not enough time for the people who crave McDonalds and eat too much of it to die off, leaving mostly people who don't crave McDonalds to remain.

  • Enshitification is the specific process of capturing a supplier/consumer market through short term subsidies, squeezing out the competition, and then squeezing the suppliers and consumers directly.

    Increasing prices alone isn't enshitification. But increasing prices after sustaining artificially low prices for the purpose of creating a monopoly or quasi monopoly is enshitification.

    Plex most definitely was providing a good quality product but was not generating revenue, and has little to no competition (Jellyfin is a bit debatable) as a result. Was it intentional or just incompetence? Hard to prove either way. I'd say the biggest argument against enshitification is that Plex is mostly a product instead of market space hosting suppliers and consumers, like Google, YouTube, AirBNB, Uber, etc.

  • So what you are saying is it's not the immigrants that are arriving that is the problem, it's what happens to them once they are here?

    Shocker.

  • Mains electricity is highly regulated because it can and regularly does kill people and start house fires.

  • I'm not sure why the author chose this sentence and why you are picking it out. The author provided no evidence of it. Instead, when you read on it seems to be an ownership problem. People rotating in and out for a year on a ten year project. You can be the most competent and skilled worker, if you don't get the opportunity to become invested in the success of a project, of course you won't see the project become successful.

  • You'll just trust the next person to come along to do the right thing? Yikes.

    Let's make the experiment a bit more tangible. Would your answer change if the person pulling the lever got a bar of gold for each person run over.

  • I love Linux. I use it wherever I can. I don't use Linux on my primary gaming workstation, for the simple reason that the display drivers, specifically mixed extended desktop and screen mirroring is just straight up ass.

  • Such an LLM would have the "knowledge" of almost every

    Most human knowledge is not written down. Your premise is flawed to the core.

  • The amortization length affects proportion of principle paid down, but it doesn't eliminate it entirely. At the same interest rate, you end up having paid more in interest at maturity of a longer amortization, yes. In practice, this can be mostly mitigated by negotiating a lower rate, or negotiating and exercising prepayment privileges.

    More importantly, with a mortgage, ownership of the property is yours entirely, from day one, not the lenders'. What you owe is cash, not the property. The property is merely collateral in the event of default of payment.

    BTW, multi generational loan agreements are not new. They are somewhat common historically and in other places of the world. For the same reason that multigenerational housing is the historical norm.

  • Yes and no. A lot of people are misinformed. It's easy to say not being misinformed is the responsibility of the individual, just like recycling plastic is the responsibility of the individual consumer. Reality is a bit more nuanced. Misinformed people often simply don't have access to good information or critical thinking skills to not be duped. Many others are straight up vulnerable to manipulation, through fears etc.

    Democracy only works if people are informed. I think the American system has failed catastrophically to inform ordinary people.

  • Governments are the product of the people. There is no divine or natural laws that triggers "an election". A government is simply created from thin air when a group of people (any group of people) get together and say: fuck the old system, we are putting that in the trash and signing a new social contract.

    Of course, there's virtually never unanimity of agreement over this social contract in one geographic area, so that social contract is only as binding as the force used to put it in effect.

    Realistically, 6 months+ of government shutdown in the US will likely cause a collapse of the USA as a single unified federal entity, since the federal government effectively rots. At that point, all bets are off. A fracture of the US is very possible.

  • Broadly speaking this is probably true. In a smaller context, though, there are tons of counter examples. The internet for example, from just 10 years ago, was unquestionably better. AI slop, bots, enshitification, social media and browser monoculture...

    The anti science trend of MAGA over the last few years...

    Etc. Regression does happen, and we should not take things for granted.

  • I hear they are a solution to the problem of increasing mileage/efficiency. I am no fan of Tesla, but we have to admit, there is some merit to that argument, however debatable the efficiency benefits are.

    That's not to say safety isn't a serious issue. The biggest problem is the reliance on electronics. Now if someone can reinvent the design with a highly reliable mechanical system, with multiple redundancy.

  • Real life example of being blinded by "can we" instead of "should we". This society needs a great deal of introspection.

  • Define "never". Never in as in never in the history of 21st century America? Pretty tame assertion. Never in the anthropological sense? That would be completely farcical.

  • Reality check: you don't make boatloads of money for having useful skills everyone has (or should have). You make boat loads of money when you have useful skills that few people have.

  • Why stop at appliances? By that logic, humans are nothing more than self-propelled heaters. The whole universe is nothing but shifting pockets of heat like the ripples of a pond bouncing back and forth until they all disappear.

    Such nihilism.

  • Does this correlate with a map of pedestrian trips per capita? If yes, then this map isn't so interesting.