Brunette6256@sh.itjust.works to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 个月前I dont want to enter a contract when consuming your product..sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square174linkfedilinkarrow-up11.1Karrow-down19
arrow-up11.09Karrow-down1imageI dont want to enter a contract when consuming your product..sh.itjust.worksBrunette6256@sh.itjust.works to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 个月前message-square174linkfedilink
minus-squarezkfcfbzr@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up421·3 个月前It says you’re bound by “opening and using” the product, rather than “opening or using”. Have someone else open it for you. Then neither of you have done both.
minus-squarenaught101@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up270·3 个月前Thus is the kind of legalistic bullshit interpretation I can get right behind
minus-squareTruscape@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up81·3 个月前Contractual malicious compliance let’s go
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·edit-23 个月前Yeah but just to be clear, the terms are likely there for a reason and using this product probably has risks associated. The only product I want to use with a liability waiver attached is the bungie cord at the fair.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 个月前Why would a bungee cord have lead?
minus-squareIncogCyberspaceUser@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 个月前Steel is heavier than feathers
minus-squareCousin Mose@lemmy.hogru.chlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24arrow-down6·edit-23 个月前I think it should be “and/or” because if it’s just “or” the terms would only apply if you either open it or use it.
minus-squareSimpleMachine@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 个月前Go one step further and have someone under 18 who cannot legally enter into a contract open it haha
minus-squarebdonvr@thelemmy.clublinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 个月前I think having someone open if for you still counts. You’d have to already find one opened.
minus-squareTaleya@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·3 个月前Leave it in a workplace fridge with a clear sticker saying “MIKES DO NOT TOUCH”
It says you’re bound by “opening and using” the product, rather than “opening or using”. Have someone else open it for you. Then neither of you have done both.
Thus is the kind of legalistic bullshit interpretation I can get right behind
Contractual malicious compliance let’s go
Yeah but just to be clear, the terms are likely there for a reason and using this product probably has risks associated.
The only product I want to use with a liability waiver attached is the bungie cord at the fair.
Apparently, it’s full of lead.
Why would a bungee cord have lead?
Weight makes you go faster
Steel is heavier than feathers
I think it should be “and/or” because if it’s just “or” the terms would only apply if you either open it or use it.
No, that’s xor
Go one step further and have someone under 18 who cannot legally enter into a contract open it haha
I think having someone open if for you still counts. You’d have to already find one opened.
Leave it in a workplace fridge with a clear sticker saying “MIKES DO NOT TOUCH”