• fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    30 minutes ago

    It’s not exactly 30%. For sales below $1M, it’s 15%: https://developer.apple.com/app-store/small-business-program/

    In Europe, where this was established last year, they started charging a Core Technology Fee to cover the cost of hosting and data transfer: https://developer.apple.com/support/core-technology-fee/

    And if you switch payment providers, you have to pay at least 2.5% plus transaction and any intermediary fees.

    It’s nice that Proton is offering a discount, but for everyone else there may be additional ongoing costs.

  • nous@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    186
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Yen also pointed out how such a court decision could help cut inflation in the US, too, “by dropping the price of a significant chunk of digital purchases by 30% overnight”.

    I bet most companies will just take that extra 30% as profit rather than giving it back to their users like proton has.

    • plz1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yeah, Proton is bucking the obvious trend, with this one. Most companies will totally take the profits rather than lowering prices.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Companies that were app-first like mobile games probably won’t cut prices much if any. Companies that were web-first like Proton and Patreon probably will.

    • athairmor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Yeah, even of the companies don’t pocket the difference, he’s an idiot to suggest that this will cut inflation.

      This guy is just not very smart, I think.

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I think he’s a salesperson trying to sell the idea that getting rid of the apple tax is good for consumers.

        • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          getting rid of the apple tax is good for consumers.

          I mean that’s not wrong. I had no idea Apple was double-dipping like this. I wonder if Google is doing the same thing…

            • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              20
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              Every company who takes a cut from in-app purchases, be it subscriptions or DLC, should be kneecapped by this ruling.

              It’s one thing for the hosting marketplace (App Store, Steam, Play Store, etc) to take a cut from the initial purchase of a game/app. But it’s a whole other issue for that initial marketplace to keep reaching further into the dev’s pockets and take a cut from in-app purchases unrelated to where it was originally obtained.

              • Greercase@lemmus.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                4 hours ago

                That just turns paid apps into splash screens for in-app purchases though. That way apple never gets a cut because the “purchase” is in-app. Pay to be listed (maybe tiered depending on downloads) seems fair especially because it doesn’t incentivize people to do scammy things with pricing. It’s already a fee anyway.

              • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                I’m not entirely optimistic about this ruling, but we’ll see.

                Apple had no reason NOT to give refunds and then use their weight to claw it back from the app developer.

                But what happens when not-too-legit apps use non-AppStore external sites to unlock features in an app?

                In a perfect world it’s cheap and easy and reliable.

                But it can also be a scammy shop that lures you into expensive subscriptions with no easy way to cancel them (eg. gym membership) and what happens when Little Timmy spends $9000 for Nlartbux in a mobile game’s external store?

                Could go either way 🤷🏻‍♂️

                • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  what happens when Little Timmy spends $9000 for Nlartbux in a mobile game’s external store?

                  That’s why you don’t put your credit card info in a phone or tablet and let kids play with it.

                • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 hours ago

                  I’m not entirely optimistic about this ruling, but we’ll see.

                  Apple had no reason NOT to give refunds and then use their weight to claw it back from the app developer.

                  Greed.

                  But what happens when not-too-legit apps use non-AppStore external sites to unlock features in an app?

                  I suppose we will see what happens. That’s a very slippery slope though, full of FUD, and is the same logic that Apple, Microsoft, and others try to use to keep users locked into their walled gardens.

                  In a perfect world it’s cheap and easy and reliable.

                  But it can also be a scammy shop that lures you into expensive subscriptions with no easy way to cancel them (eg. gym membership) and what happens when Little Timmy spends $9000 for Nlartbux in a mobile game’s external store?

                  Could be. Multiple alternative markets exist for Android already though, and some shops are scammy as fuck. Google has already put protections in place to prevent sideloading potentially harmful apps (including alternative markets), but the savvy user who knows how to bypass those restrictions should* know how to spot scammy shit.

                  Could go either way 🤷🏻‍♂️

                  “For your security” was never about security.

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            What do you mean “double dipping”? I don’t own any Apple products. I purchased through Proton’s website.

            • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              If someone purchases a Proton plan through their iOS app, Apple got a 30% cut of that. Which is stupid. Because Proton (and every other company with an iOS app) already pays Apple to simply have their app on Apple’s app store.

              • Ulrich@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 hours ago

                Proton…already pays Apple to simply have their app on Apple’s app store.

                Uhhh I mean they pay a $100/year developer fee, which probably doesn’t even cover the infrastructure costs. Is that what you’re referring to?

                I’m not arguing against you, Apple should consider those costs as a service to their (overpaying) customers. I’m just not sure what other costs you’re referring to.

                • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 hours ago

                  Is that what you’re referring to?

                  Yes (I thought it was more, but w/e). I’ll admit, I don’t know a whole lot about development and everything that it entails, but nuance is key here. Say what you will about Proton, but this ruling just set a precedent that a company hosting an app/game download cannot take a cut from purchases completed within said app/game. That affects everyone.

                  I’m just looking at this from a bigger picture perspective. Apple has more than enough money already, and frankly there are far too many companies like this who need to be cut back down.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Or he’s just shitting on other companies who he knows are too greedy to do the same. Proton is getting positive press for this and he’s leaning into it with a bit of hyperbole

        Not saying he’s a genius or anything, he’s just a spokesperson doing spokesperson things

        • paraphrand@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          How many years until prices go up? I bet they marked down 1-2 years where they realize they can’t up the prices. But after, it will creep up.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yep, product prices are not based on costs but rather just the absolute maximum of what consumers are willing to pay.

      Proton just seems to be an exception.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It doesn’t matter either way. Never do it that anyway. You would think people would learn a thing after being thoroughly fucked by apple and google…

      It is amazing how sundar and Tim literally violated you in sexually uncomfortable ways but you are crying about Andy being a pathetic regime whore…

  • suicidaleggroll@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    If they can charge 30% less without Apple’s fees, then why are their prices the same whether you buy on their iOS app or direct on their website? Why have they been overcharging users who don’t buy through the iOS app by 30% all this time?

    • Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      71
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Old knowledge disclaimer, but if they didn’t change it then:

      Because Apple literally tells people that they’re not allowed to charge less somewhere else - at least that was the case several years ago…

      • patrick@lemmy.bestiver.se
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Some things do charge different amounts though. YouTube Premium for example is more expensive if you subscribe in iOS but maybe that’s just because it’s Google.

        They also could have just not let anyone subscribe through the iOS app. Lots of things do that.

        • errer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I’ve noticed this too, there’s no consistency. Some companies seem to get away with two prices, others not.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        This is the same on most platforms. You’ll rarely find a product for different prices in different places because if they’re listed on Amazon, Steam, Apple, Google, etc. they’re not allowed to.

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          That isn’t exactly true with Steam. Valve does allow a dev to offer a discount at a different store as long as that same discount comes to Steam in a reasonable amount of time.

          Straight from the docs:“It’s OK to run a discount for Steam Keys on different stores at different times as long as you plan to give a comparable offer to Steam customers within a reasonable amount of time.”

          • Max@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 minutes ago

            That’s probably only for selling steam keys on another store. You might be able to sell non steam versions for any price you want

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Yes but recent lawsuits have exposed that their policies and their enforcement aren’t aligned.

      • Cort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 seconds ago

        Most favored nation clause. Apple gets the lowest price that you offer. I’d you offer any discounts elsewhere, that have to be the same on the app store

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    4 hours ago

    No doubt Proton’s CEO will use this to justify his “Trump is better for regulating big tech” claim, while ignoring the fact that the judge in this case is an Obama appointee.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Andy big mad they didn’t invite him to the Inauguration, he should sitting there next to sundar the creep!!!

      And Faceberg and Bezonator