European leaders holding emergency talks in Brussels have agreed on a massive increase to defence spending, amid a drive to shore up support for Ukraine after Donald Trump halted US military aid and intelligence sharing.

But the show of unity was marred by Hungary’s prime minister, Viktor Orbán, failing to endorse an EU statement on Ukraine pushing back against Trump’s Russia-friendly negotiating stance.

The 26 other EU leaders, including Orbán’s ally Robert Fico, the Slovakian prime minister, “firmly supported” the statement. “There can be no negotiations on Ukraine without Ukraine,” said the draft statement, a response to Trump’s attempt to sideline Europe and Kyiv.

    • NimdaQA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      No way dude! But with what industry though?

      In all seriousness, Russia was producing 20-30 T-90Ms per month (or 240-360 per year) in 2024 going off of monthly deliveries. The entirety of Europe cannot even match this. The only country I am aware of that can produce this many tanks per month is South Korea and China. This has likely increased since then but due to increased OPSEC, there have been no videos of batches of T-90Ms (or even T-72B3s) being delivered. But missile production has doubled since 2024 so I would not be surprised that tank production has also doubled to 40-60 per month (480-720 per year).

      I have been keeping track of T-90M deliveries for a while now:

      Link

      Link

      Link

      Link

      Link

      Link

      Link

      Link

      Link

      It was always around 20-30 per month last year. This means Russia produces more tanks than the amount the entire German military has in a single year. And as I stated, this likely has doubled but it is impossible to verify as OPSEC means we have not seen any deliveries on video for half a year now. Europe can’t even produce their own ballistic missiles which have been a game changer in Ukraine as shown by the effectiveness of ATACMS and Iskander-M.

      Russia is producing more shells than the entirety of Europe combined who struggles to supply Ukraine with even a million shells (while Russia was producing 3 million per year in 2024).

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Are you missing the part where Russia has to produce so many tanks because Ukrainians keep blowing them up?

        Ukraine has also had a lot of success with Storm Shadow missiles. I’ll let you google where those are made.

        And of course Ukraine on it’s own is now producing about 50% of the number of shells Russia produces. And there’s a lot of drones that Ukraine is producing, which have proven to be very effective against the Russian military.

        Russia will soon be broke from this war. It will take a decade for Russia to have the military strength to take on the EU and that can only begin when Russia ends it’s war with Ukraine. In that time the EU can build a strong force to counter Russia.

        The free world doesn’t need the US, and it certainly doesn’t need Russia.

        • NimdaQA@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago
          1. Oryx states otherwise. Russia has only lost 127 T-90Ms despite producing 240-360 in 2023 and likely double that this year. Russia has only lost 789 T-72BA and T-72B3 tanks after three whole years of war despite having 2,650 of them at the start of the war with hundreds of older T-72Bs being taken out of storage and modernized to replace losses.
          2. Storm Shadow is not a ballistic missile but a cruise missile. Only 3,000 have been produced after 2 decades while Russia produces more than 500 Kh-101 air-launched cruise missiles per year. And the Kh-101 is much longer range… Including other air-launched cruise missiles, Russia is producing around a thousand per year. Production has also been outpacing use.
          3. Ukraine has a wartime economy spending 30% of its GDP. Russia meanwhile is only spending 6% of its GDP on the military (comparable to US and Poland in terms of percentage of GDP.
      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Russia us on a wartime economy and struggling with 1 European country that is using a portion of peacetime stocks from the rest of Europe.

        If Europe wants to take this seriously, Russia doesn’t have a chance.

        • NimdaQA@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          Russia does not have a wartime economy. They are only spending 6% of their GDP on their military which is comparable to the US or Poland in terms of percentage of GDP. EU has given up far more than just a portion. UK has supplied Ukraine with all of its SPGs. Poland supplied Ukraine with half of its SPGs. The US has supplied Ukraine with 15% of its entire ATACMS stockpile (a missile which is no longer produced and does not yet have a viable alternative due to PRSM still being in low-rate production) as of six months ago. The EU has given up a significant portion of their ammunition to Ukraine. The only thing they did not give is tanks because Ukraine already had a thousand tanks at the start of the war (half of which were modern) which is more tanks than the amount that France, Germany, and the UK have combined.

          Most of the Russian military is not in Ukraine per my other comment.

          • Caveman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            6% is from the public sector. Russia is very much forcing the private sector to also produce and forcing them to take loans.

      • NotLemming@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Noone cares for your Russian propaganda here. Go away. Quit your troll farm job and go do something better.

        • NimdaQA@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          25
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Yes because everything you disagree with is either propaganda or part of a troll farm. Don’t like my data? Find me better ones.

          Yawn

          How I love the standard NAFO reply of “muh propaganda!”

          • Nalivai@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 day ago

            Ahah, your “data” is a footage from Russian propaganda tv showing a tank driving on some field, or some people at a free concert listening to a guy singing badly. Me farting in your general direction is a better source of information.

            • NimdaQA@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              The videos are deliveries, some of said videos are just tanks on trains.

              Those are not all the links I have available, just too lazy right now. Might add more later.

          • NotLemming@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            2 days ago

            I wouldn’t waste my time. That’s the only reason you’re here, to waste our time.

      • Tattorack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        You must not have been paying attention much, because all the quantity Russia can produce is only managing to hold them in a stale mate.

        • NimdaQA@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Except most of the Russian military is not in Ukraine.

          The war in Ukraine is mostly fought with irregulars who are not given the best of equipment. Why waste good equipment on poorly trained irregulars?

          Russia had 170 BTGs fully composed of professional soldiers at the start of 2021 but only sent in 64-69 of them in 2022. Russian BTGs were also sent into Ukraine at half strength. This is similar to what happened during the war in Donbas with BTGs keeping half of their strength at home, again similar to War in Donbas.

          The majority of forces in Ukraine are from irregular volunteer formations recruited from regions across Russia. There is a reason why losses for professionals are so low. Aside from these formations, there is also 51st GCAA and 3rd GCAA made up of former Donetsk and Luhansk units. There is also 3rd AC which is a irregular volunteer formation that was formed during the Ukrainian offensive in Kharkov where Russian professionals withdrew under the cover of 3rd AC who was thrown into the meat grinder to stem the tide.

          Motorized Rifles: 6,457

          VDV: 3,257

          Naval Infantry: 1,305

          Tank Crew: 1,806

          Artillery: 851

          Special Forces: 736

          Engineering: 291

          Navy: 291

          VVS: 265

          Other: 957

          Total: 16,216

          Source: MediaZona

          For comparison:

          US losses from 2003-2005 mainly against insurgents: 5175

          Source: Defense Casualty Analysis System

          MediaZona also proves that the majority of losses now are volunteers from irregular volunteer formations. These are irregular volunteer formations by the way:

          Link

          Link

          Link

          Link

          Link

          These irregular volunteer formations rely on their local regional government to supply them with weapons and equipment not the federal government. This is well shown by the Tuvan volunteers who come from the poorest region in Russia which shows in their equipment:

          Link

          They also rely heavily on donations:

          Link

          Link

          Link

          Thankfully Chechnya has recently taken on the burden of training and equipping them (why you see them being shipped from Chechnya) as shown here:

          Link

          Link

          Link

          Chechnya training and sending more batches of volunteers from across Russia to the SMO zone:

          Link

          Link