D•Scribe
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
LOCKMART@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 4 months ago

Be sure to drop some classified stories in the comments, Seals

sh.itjust.works

message-square
42
fedilink
376

Be sure to drop some classified stories in the comments, Seals

sh.itjust.works

LOCKMART@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 4 months ago
message-square
42
fedilink
  • Neon 🏳️‍🌈🇺🇦🇪🇺🏳️‍⚧️🇹🇼🇮🇱🏳️‍🌈@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    claims

    Greenland is a sovereign country in the kingdom of denmark, nothing that needs to be claimed.

    The same way denmark is a sovereign country in the kingdom of denmark

    Denmark (country) ≠ Denmark (Kingdom)

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      Are you saying that the Danes have nothing to do with the kingdom of Denmark?

      • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        Does the UK “claim” Canada because of their relationship to the crown?

        • CountVon@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          The UK did claim Canada, along with most of North America, in the Royal Proclamation of 1763. Canada was granted progressively more autonomy over time but the UK still maintained ultimate sovereignty until the Canadian constitution was patriated. The UK effectively ceded its sovereignty over Canada when UK parliament passed the Canada Act 1982.

          Denmark granted Greenland autonomy with the 2009 Act on Greenland Self-Government, but Denmark still maintains the authority to modify Greenland’s constitutional arrangement. So, much like the UK still held sovereignty over Canada prior to 1982, Denmark still holds sovereignty over Greenland. Apparently there have been some efforts to draft a constitution for Greenland, but that has not been passed into law by Greenland’s lawmakers nor has it been patriated by Denmark.

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            4 months ago

            This makes sense. I completely understand this thank you.

        • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Ooohhh.

          I did not realize until this moment that I didn’t understand their relationship correctly.

          • AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            4 months ago

            It’s not the same as the UK-Canada relationship either though, because the UK isn’t responsible for Canada’s defence and foreign policy.

        • Silic0n_Alph4@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yes, but mostly because it’s a rock in the middle of the ocean, albeit a really big one.

          Don’t touch our rock collection.

      • Neon 🏳️‍🌈🇺🇦🇪🇺🏳️‍⚧️🇹🇼🇮🇱🏳️‍🌈@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        They do stand in a relation to each other, but they’re not the same thing.

        As I said, Denmark (country) is in the kingdom of denmark, so they have something to do with each ither.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Oh so this is more of a pedantic thing than an actual reasonable difference gotcha.

          • wieson@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            4 months ago

            I don’t think it is for the people on the inside.

            It’s comparable to saying: no, Scotland is not in England, Scotland is in the UK and England is in the UK.

          • Neon 🏳️‍🌈🇺🇦🇪🇺🏳️‍⚧️🇹🇼🇮🇱🏳️‍🌈@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            No, tht’s not it either.

            Think of the kingdom of denmark as kind of a Mini-EU consisting of Denmark, the Faroe Islands and Greenland.

            • rumba@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              So if Trump tries to annex it Danish people won’t come to try to protect it. Making the image not accurate?

              • Neon 🏳️‍🌈🇺🇦🇪🇺🏳️‍⚧️🇹🇼🇮🇱🏳️‍🌈@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                Not really either. While greenland and the others are highly autonomous and practically their own countries, national security is not in their competence but instead the job of the kingdom. Not like NATO where every country has their own military and has to help each other but as a federation where there is only one military.

                Niels Anderson does a way better Job than me explaining it:

                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlK3f1cs_l4

NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.works

noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be nice

Do not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a “credible” source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it’s non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don’t care if you’re Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don’t want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how “open source” and “easy to find” it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody’s art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art’s source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a “haha people that I hate died… haha” punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don’t be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in

  • !militaryporn@lemmy.world
  • !forgottenweapons@lemmy.world
  • !combatvideos@sh.itjust.works
  • !militarymoe@ani.social

Banner made by u/Fertility18

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 150 users / day
  • 1.01K users / week
  • 2.08K users / month
  • 9.18K users / 6 months
  • 2 local subscribers
  • 7.41K subscribers
  • 847 Posts
  • 7.11K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Shit@sh.itjust.works
  • OttoVonNoob@lemmy.ca
  • Fisting for Freedom@sh.itjust.works
  • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
  • nuke@sh.itjust.works
  • skillissuer@sh.itjust.works
  • Estiar@sh.itjust.works
  • neidu2@feddit.nl
  • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
  • UI: unknown version
  • BE: 0.19.9
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org