Care to elaborate? Not saying I doubt you, it’s just the polar opposite of my experience and I’m curious why that is.

What an odd way to say “America started a drone war without enough weapons to intercept drones.”

The frogurt is also cursed.

destroying the ozone layer

This made me ask “wait, is that true” and apparently it is. Super, skin cancer for everyone. 🤦

GrapheneOS aims to maintain update support for at least 5 years (from their FAQ). GrapheneOS still supports Pixel 5 for example (released 5 years, 8 months ago), Google stopped updating that model in Nov. 2023. GrapheneOS likely won’t maintain support for older models forever, but for older devices they can extend the life a good few years past Google’s end of support.

ETA: In fairness to Google, their support window on newer models is a lot better. From https://endoflife.date/pixel, for Pixel 8, 9 & 10 series they’ve committed to 7 years of Android updates. My Pixel 7 is only getting 4 years of updates, hence my interest in GrapheneOS.

I know, but… The opportunity cost of her occupying that position! Imagine if we’d had someone actually willing to exercise power to rein in Trump, instead of someone making tut tut noises while conducting massive insider trading. She deserves all the dragging we can muster.

This is it. A 2006 Ford F150 has a hood height of 51 inches, or just over 4 feet. Getting hit by one of these would be bad, but for many people it wouldn’t likely result in a head injury. A 2026 Ford F150 has a hood height of 75 inches, or more than 6 feet tall. Getting hit by one of these as a pedestrian is practically a guaranteed head injury.

I’m sure there are other factors. Higher speeds, lack of investment in infrastructure, political unwillingness to make any changes that might increase congestion or slow down drivers. But I believe hood height is playing a huge role in the type and severity of pedestrian injuries in the US and Canada.

I think that part kinda makes sense. The lid is domed, which increases its strength. The seam where the lid meets the walls would tend to be the weakest point. I’m more surprised there was such a violent explosion in the first place, usually they just burn. Could be that tank was partially empty and the area beneath the lid was a highly combustible fuel/air mix. Drone hits the tank, vapour ignites, and pop.

Possibly some form of insurance. “Be a real shame if someone were to lob a drone at your big, slow, expensive oil tanker…”

after rubbing alcohol was thrown onto a lit torch

Why would you even do that?? Props to the medical team, and I’m happy the victim healed so well, but seems like something that just shouldn’t have happened in the first place.

TIL Spaghettios are ring shaped pasta in tomato soup…

Yes, the docs linked in OP’s post have this note:

Mesa 25.1.3+ minimum, 25.1.5+ recommended for proper RADV driver support.

I was gonna make the same comment but you beat me to it. Article title kinda buries the lede here, the “trained to bite” part seems so much more incriminating to me.

Just one time, as a lil treat…

The Anti-Defamation League.

Likely reversed because whoever edited these clips together wanted the camera to be moving consistently forward. If they didn’t reverse the middle clip it would give the impression that the camera was moving forward, then backward, then forward again. Editor probably figured most viewers would likely focus their attention on the waving flag and not notice the backwards walking. I didn’t notice until I saw your comment and rewatched the clip!

Edit: but then there’s a backwards camera move at the end, so now I’m questioning my own theory…

Definitely that, but also, are those pins not recessed or guarded?? That seems like really poor engineering. There could have been some kind of physical keying between the charger and the controller to prevent other metallic items from inadvertently bridging the contacts.

Once he loses power, he’ll be pretty lucky if he only loses his freedom. He’s kept a lot of oligarchs under his thumb for a long time…

One of the show’s tech consultants addressed that in this interview:

What are some of the challenges faced in presenting hacking and cybersecurity in both a realistic and an entertaining manner?

I think the biggest challenge is time. We are only given seconds to demonstrate a hack that could take hours. While we are accurate about the details of the hack, we must fudge the time element.

I think the short answer is that it doesn’t. VaultWarden is currently open source, and no private equity organization can put the genie back in the bottle. If things get really bad then someone would likely fork the open source bits and maintain a pure open source version, in which case there would likely be a procedure to migrate existing VaultWarden installs to the purely open source successor. I don’t think VaultWarden users need to be overly concerned at this point.