• bagsy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    people should have a right to life saving drugs. Our country was designed to protect the right to profit, but not the right to live.

  • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    There’s no such thing as a “free market” in the USA. Like, just look at venture capital ventures: they blow a wad of cash, bloat out competition, ratchet up prices, and profit. The fact that it requires so much capital automatically dissolves most competition, not much of a free market. Also, we’d need to deregulate to have a free market because one thing that disbars competition is the hurdles to even enter the market due to regulations, but regulations are there…like safety regulations, which were written in blood and lawsuits.

  • Bakkoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Pharma does this all the time. What’s even worse is they will buy the nda/patent and trial it for a completely different application, refile and get a year of exclusivity as the first generic on the market. And the price will skyrocket.

    I spent almost two decades working for Tycho, Covidien, Mallinckrodt, GSK/Haleon and several more. The only thing redeeming was the people at the bottom. The rest is just shit all the way up.

  • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Wasn’t it Martin Shekreli or another asswipe said that it was a moral duty of pharma makers to charge as much as possible for medication?

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    13 hours ago

    In the USA you can arrest every CEO of every for profit company and still be sure that you did not accidentally arrest an innocent person

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    And this is why science is getting a bad name. I can kinda understand why there is scepticism on the field, especially vaccine. When explained why vaccine is not pure snakes oil, a retort could be “Oh yeah? Those times when pharmaceuticals did such and such…”

    • dubs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The American medical system has been openly screwing people over for decades. It’s hard to instill trust in things like vaccines when people are repeatedly treated that way.

      I don’t blame the doctors, or the nurses, or the scientists. They are generally doing the best they can in a shitty system. I blame the people who built the system to intentionally be shitty: The administrators, owners, and politicians.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        the people who built the system to intentionally be shitty: The administrators, owners, and politicians.

        Through the insurance companies, they are integral to the whole scam.

  • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    18 hours ago

    In Canada I can walk into any drugstore and get a free naloxone kit. I have no drug addicts in my family and I still have one because my parents kept grabbing one when they would pickup their prescriptions lol

    Wtf is going on down there buddy?

    • FundMECFS@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      No one’s trying to “make you depressed”.

      It’s a meme with an example of the failings of capitalism, not a news post.

      • yucandu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        14 hours ago

        No one’s trying to “make you depressed”.

        Working class apathy is absolutely a goal of the capitalists.

        • FundMECFS@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Apathy yes. Though reducing depression to apathy is problematic. And this isn’t a post by a capitalist but a post criticisng capitalism in an anarchist community. (sorry in advance for being a pedant lol, but I feel it was sort of unfair insinuating OP and the meme had that purpose).

  • Xahvoc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    If anyone needs this information you can still get naloxene for free through some pharmacies and doctor’s offices in the USA. They ask you to fill out a questionnaire, but it doesn’t cost anything. I acknowledge this is also likely a state by state thing and it isn’t offered everywhere. Still worth asking, though!

    • Malica@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I highly recommend carrying some if you can get it, you never know where you might encounter an overdose and you could save a life.

  • MangoCats@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t call this Capitalism so much as political demonizing of “the other” - get a few beers in 'em and then ask: “well, don’t those junkies deserve to die anyway? I mean, aren’t we all better off with them gone?” And they’ll say yes, sometimes even when it’s their own brother/sister or daughter/son or father/mother who is the addict, but they get strangely quiet when it’s themselves.

    • NonconfrontationaI@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yeah that company made record profit because fuck junkies, lol.

      You don’t think the money was the primary thought and the junkies were an afterthought at best?

    • PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I read your other comments and you seem informed and aware of a lot, I just don’t see how you can reflect on such and decide it isn’t ultimately driven by capitalism?

      All of the “othering” you’ve witnessed and are (I think accurately) describing - that human tendency toward incoherent tribalistic behaviors and worldviews - that’s baked into us, no disagreement there. But it’s the capitalists who leverage it so successfully against us all and have made it the force that it is, here and today.

      Like yeah the phenomena is real pretty much as you’re describing, and it results from, is intentionally amplified by (doesn’t just incidentally feed into) the way we are choosing to run our society. Capitalism + basic human nature = what we’re all watching.

      Not being a jerk. How does capitalism get off the hook as a primary cause here?

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I don’t view capitalism as the primary cause, but more as the excuse. We don’t have free unfettered capitalism, there are price controls, labor regulations, every kind of distortion of capitalism: when it serves the agendas at play. When the agenda doesn’t care to protect a certain class, like diabetics with not much money, then the agenda lets capitalism run wild.

        So, sure, blame capitalism - it’s what happens when you let people decide how much profit they want in combination with IP protections and monopoly markets. That way you don’t have to point the finger at a “communist” central planning committee that arbitrarily decided the price for something. In the end, it’s still people making decisions. As the song goes: when you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.

        • PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          You seem to just be using your own definitions of capitalism and communism. It’s probably not worth bickering much about, but what you’re saying doesn’t make sense. Not in the way where I think you’re wrong and I disagree, in the way that your argument isn’t coherent enough to refute.

          • MangoCats@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            definitions of capitalism and communism. It’s probably not worth bickering much about

            If anything, that’s my core point. Whatever definition you try to put on capitalism or communism, you won’t find it practiced like that. Our economies are dictated by legislation, executive orders, judicial decisions, corporate actions both inside and outside the law. Labels like capitalism and communism are more window dressing than actual function.

            your argument isn’t coherent enough to refute.

            Which is my position regarding people saying “this is capitalism.”

            • PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Labels like capitalism and communism are more window dressing than actual function

              Nah fam. There’s no point in labeling sets of ideas if they’re rendered useless the moment they diverge from your imagined “pure” form. Being more complicated in practice than just a simple textbook definition doesn’t mean they aren’t “that” defined thing, it means textbook definitions are always fundamentally weak and flawed. Oversimplifications, models used to describe, not blueprints used to build.

              Capitalism is roughly everywhere, underpinning everything globally because of its roaring success. Communism is roughly nowhere, for the same reasons of capitalism’s overwhelming power.

              The distinctions exist and matter.

                • PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 hour ago

                  “Democratic”, now there is a very slippery word in any country lol. Regardless, Russia is not communist, I don’t know what you think you’re pointing out. Let’s go ahead and drop it yeah?

        • NonconfrontationaI@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          We just watched a guy become a trillionaire and dump 200 million dollars into an election for the most powerful seat on the planet. But you don’t think the problem is capitalism???

          • MangoCats@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Citizens United would be my first target. Campaign finance laws in general coming next. A big root cause lies in ownership of “the free press,” that one will be trickier, where does “news” stop and “entertainment” begin - and how would you ever regulate politics out of “entertainment” without impacting free speech? But, it’s important to address if you want to really reduce money’s influence in politics. Unfortunately, our legislators have been running the opposite direction for decades and the ballot box seems ineffective at convincing them to turn around.

            Targeting capitalism, or communism, or pastafarianism, is pointless - they’re big fuzzy clouds that you can’t define, can’t contain.

              • MangoCats@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 hours ago

                The first 30 seconds are going down a very sensible path. It’s not our figureheads which “rule us” - it’s the people who put them in power. In theory it’s a democracy, in practice it’s a mish-mash where the opinions of the masses can be, and are, manipulated by those with the resources and inclination to do so.

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leave_the_World_Behind_(film) hit pretty close to my perception of “how it works” in their little monologue about “who makes the decisions.”

            • NonconfrontationaI@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 hours ago

              You’re confusing religion with economic systems of government.

              Capitalism and communism very much have definitions. Don’t let your governments obfuscation of words cloud your mind.

              • MangoCats@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Capitalism and communism very much have definitions, which are not actually practiced in anything resembling “pure form” anywhere on this planet in any society of more than a couple of thousand members in human history.

                You might as well call our economic system a religion, like Pastafarianism, because what it actually is is a byzantine collection of laws and rules and regulations which have about as much to do with the “ideals” of either captialism or communism as your average US “Christian” Megachurch has to with the written teachings of Jesus.

    • Valthorn@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s also literally how supply and demand work. Demand for the medicine is increasing, thus they raise the price. No ethics needed. That’s why it’s fucked up. Capitalism doesn’t consider the drug addicts less worth - it doesn’t consider them at all.

        • Valthorn@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Which is just “good business practice”. If there’s no demand for your product, create it.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, but these kinds of price swings aren’t suppy and demand driven, they’re agenda driven.

          • MangoCats@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            That’s not true.

            Different, yet similar, agendas.

            What agenda do you think drove the “masks are for sissies” COVID response?

            We have plenty of capacity to make all the insulin we need and more, it’s a more profitable business when there’s short supply. We have an infinite capacity for greed.

            • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              We have plenty of capacity to make all the insulin we need and more, it’s a more profitable business when there’s short supply. We have an infinite capacity for greed.

              Exactly, that is free market capitalism.

              What agenda do you think drove the “masks are for sissies” COVID response?

              That one I’m not sure about, but I can’t think of a way it’s money related. However, the prevalence and cost of masks definitely went up during the pandemic, as most people did mask up. Some other supplies also went up in price, like microphones and cameras for computers as everyone started working from home.

              • MangoCats@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                I can’t think of a way it’s money related.

                Just use the tiniest bit of imagination… how many boomers are out there spending down their retirement savings on healthcare and nursing homes? How many of their (fiscally eager to advance) children aren’t too upset that they inherited early, before it was spent down, because the disease that kills old people - unfortunately - took out dear old mumsy and pop who swore they’d never give them a dime until they died?

                most people did mask up

                That wasn’t my experience in Floriduh.

                • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  That wasn’t my experience in Floriduh.

                  It depends heavily on the location. It was basically split right down party lines. Blue areas were like 90% masked, red areas were like 90% unmasked.

                  Just use the tiniest bit of imagination…

                  I’m trying not to stoop to the level of conspiracy theories. Even so, I don’t think your explanation makes any sense. How would the younger generations, especially those without money, contribute to the right wing propaganda that championed anti-masking ideas? Not to mention that most people care about their relatives for more than just their money.

                  The whole anti-masking things makes more sense to me as part of the long-running trend of anti-science propaganda from the right. Maybe that’s driven by oil companies because anti-science attitudes drive climate change denialism. But it also might just be the effects of the social issues that spun off of these things.

                  One curious anechdote - my dad was heavily questioning masking during COVID but I don’t remember him questioning masking when our town was full of smoke from wildfires from a few hundred miles north.

    • immuredanchorite [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      What do you mean you don’t call it capitalism? It literally is capitalism. All of those other things are just what the people doing this tell themselves to sleep at night. And its also the story you are telling yourself so that you can blame the other bad/greedy people instead of examining how this is the system working exactly as intended and you are a part of it … you even seems to be defending it (capitalism) - but profit is the social determinant for what happens in the capitalist system, thats like, its definition