• tory@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Using the term “normies” paints you as having a superiority complex, which isn’t the best look.

    • alyth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Really? I just interpreted the use of normie here as “layperson” or “average user” and thought it was completely harmless.

      • MxM111@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yes, it means layperson, but with derogatory cense. It is like using the n-word to describe black people (though not as extreme). If you mean average user, just say average user, unless you really mean to use derogatory term, that is.

  • d_k_bo@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I recently got a confused look when I said that I pay for my email provider (3€/mo, but 1€/mo would also work).

    Many people don’t realize that operating an email server creates cost and they pay with letting Google/Yahoo/… read and analyze their communication.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I think the funniest part of this meme is every company bar Amazon, Discord (both not in market yet), and TikTok (Chinese) were confirmed to be a part of NSA’s PRISM

  • recarsion@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    “But why would they care about MY data, I don’t do anything special”

    Anyone outside of tech when I even passingly mention privacy

      • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        What’s the counter to that sentence then?

        Every time I try to explain why this is a dumb sentence using the door lock analogy I always get rebuffed by it.

        • glassware@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          All the answers you got show why this conversation goes badly. No one can come up with an actual problem that data collection causes, it’s all silly comparisons to giving people your credit card number or shitting in front of them.

          For me, having my data collected is like having CCTV cameras in stores. Yeah, technically someone is filming everything I do. Yeah it would be bad if a private individual was filming me for nefarious reasons. But no one actually uses that data for anything bad, and it doesn’t actually cause any problems.

          All that happens is I get more relevant ads.

  • HouseWolf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    ‘There’s no point fighting it’ or ‘Privacy is already dead’

    The arguments that make my eye twitch, It’s such a defeatist outlook but seems like the most common nowadays.

    • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      There is a 3rd argument which I think is a bit more valid in “I value the service I receive in exchange for my personal data”

      Using the internet without an adblocker, noscript, and whatever else is really nasty. But even if you aren’t on these platforms, marketers are still building profiles on you. Honestly we need data privacy legislation and some real talk about marketing and the costs of using the internet as a society.