And the problem with LLM code is that it’s often bad and has a lot of volume. If their process for rejecting bad human code can scale to also reject bad LLM code, I don’t see a problem with allowing for the possibility that someone submits LLM code worth accepting.
Last time I saw Linus in the news he was ripping into someone submitting a huge blob of code after the deadline, and said that would not be going into the next kernel. So he’s at least expecting humans to review things thoroughly, otherwise why allocate time for human review?
Eeh, I don’t think he is going to stop tearing people a new one for submitting bad code, though. He lives for the flame.
And the problem with LLM code is that it’s often bad and has a lot of volume. If their process for rejecting bad human code can scale to also reject bad LLM code, I don’t see a problem with allowing for the possibility that someone submits LLM code worth accepting.
just use an LLM to review the code, duh /s
Last time I saw Linus in the news he was ripping into someone submitting a huge blob of code after the deadline, and said that would not be going into the next kernel. So he’s at least expecting humans to review things thoroughly, otherwise why allocate time for human review?