• adarza@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    166
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    a failure so spectacular, it lead to fdr, the new deal… republicans wouldn’t win the white house back until 1952.

    • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      104
      ·
      1 day ago

      And only 6 years after they finally got the Whitehouse again, they started plotting for the next massive fuck up era by founding the John Birch Society (which is a major cause for the GOP’s current psychosis.

      • Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 day ago

        Don’t forget about the McCarthyism of the late 40s and the 50s. Ronald Reagan was involved with that particular movement since the beginning when he testified in front of Congress (specifically the House Un-American Activities Committee) saying that communists were taking over Hollywood.

        • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah, I agree. As conservatives go Ike was pretty reasonable.

          My point was that almost as soon as the party got the Whitehouse again, influential portions of it started to plot for the next Great Depression like catastrophy.

          As an ideological movement, they’ve proved many times that they cannot be trusted with power.

          • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 day ago

            The rich people made a lot of money from the last Great Depression, I bet that’s what they’re hoping for again.

    • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah but the Democrats were competent back then. I don’t have confidence in most of the modern Democrats. There are only like 3 of them who seem to get what’s going on

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        A lot of that comes from the development of corporate lobbyists and special interest groups in the 1970s. Even then they were highly regulated, and oversized campaign contributions still counted as bribes. That all changed after Reagan got into office, and Gucci Gulch got unfettered access to elected officials. After that, a lot of politicians were too tempted by the prospect of getting fantastically wealthy and forgot about the dream of changing the world for the better.

        A lot of this isn’t really new. To quote Rutherford B. Hayes, The real difficulty is with the vast wealth and power in the hands of the few and the unscrupulous who represent or control capital. Hundreds of laws of Congress and the state legislatures are in the interest of these men and against the interests of workingmen. These need to be exposed and repealed. All laws on corporations, on taxation, on trusts, wills, descent, and the like, need examination and extensive change. This is a government of the people, by the people, and for the people no longer. It is a government of corporations, by corporations, and for corporations.

        So the influence of wealth and corporate interest on political power is, in fact, an old problem. What frustrates me is how reforms could have been made during their rare collective moments of conscience, and they didn’t. To be fair, civil liberties of non-whites and women were a higher priority.