Source is Part III § 2 of the US flag code enshrined by 4 U.S.C. § 5.
On the admission of a new State into the Union one star shall be added to the union of the flag; and such addition shall take effect on the fourth day of July then next succeeding such admission.
This isn’t legally binding – you can fly a US flag with five stars representing the CCP and its four governed social classes if you want. But it does represent official federal guidance on the design of the US flag. So if Washington, D.C. were added as a state, you wouldn’t see the 51st star appear on federal buildings until the subsequent Independence Day.
Fortunately or unfortunately, it’s hard to care much about such trivia when it comes to an empire sinking like a lead-infused balloon.
If it makes you feel any better, we were on a very bad course and if theres hope it’s gonna meaningfully change, this kind of catastrophic moment might be the only realistic way that actually happens
Sending love and hugs from a neighbor, take care of youself :)
Thanks, Cris. I guess we’ll just have to read the funny-papers to see, eh?
we were on a very bad course
I think it can be traced back fairly directly going back ~60yrs ago. But really? It was more like a foundational problem with the way this clown-show empire was built from the ground up.
It was Reagan. Everything wrong is basically a game of 6 degrees of Ronald Reagan.
Even early, Nixon.
“Centrist” in theory, who laid down a path of doom in so many ways…
I think it would be more interesting to know how they handle losing a few stars at this point.
What if it was more of a take a state, leave a state policy?
“For fuck’s sake, Mexico. This was supposed to be your weekend with Texas. I had to delay my renewable energy plan again because you were off at the beach with your new girlfriend Cuba.”
If states leave the union, does this rule apply too?
But for merging? Theoretically legal. Never happening in practice. (For small states, who’d be the likeliest to have a reason to merge, you’d completely fuck your Congressional representation. You’d have to sort out a mountain of laws to merge, throw away, etc. All states wanting to merge and Congress would have to approve. You’d probably spend decades messily unifying infrastructure. I could keep going; there’s no realistic circumstance.).
I don’t see any provision for it, so I assume – between secession being repeatedly, handily struck down as unconstitutional and merging being so unfathomable – that it’s easier to just make something up ad hoc (or go by the addition rule) if any states ever merge.
I was thinking a bit ahead. Once the GOP loses the midterms, Trump is probably going to send in the natl guard to several states, proclaiming “the election was stolen.” He will go far beyond the threats of the last lost election. Since the army is, already fully intimidated, dancing to trump’s flute, a few states and a few generals may well unite and decide enough=enough. Then the second civil war will start, for the same reason as the first one (1861-65): secession. And ultimately a couple of stars may well need to be removed.
A flag with 5 stars isn’t a US flag. It’s like those black line flags or any basically any flag that’s similar to the US flag isn’t a US flag.
The only flags that are different than our current one would be previous US flags.
If “a US flag modified to have five stars representing the CCP and its four governed social classes” reads better for you, then that’s what I was getting at. Obviously it fails the criteria in the linked flag code.
Northern California and southern california need to split. Highways don’t need ‘the’ in front of the numbers.
It’s a neat thought but there will never be another change in the number of states, nor constitutional amendment, nor any significant legislation or sweeping agendas will be happening during the remaining years of our dying republic.
puerto rico and Israel are missing their stars
Israel isn’t a state. The US is a colony of Israel.
