• OwOarchist@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    2 months ago

    Now, now. You can’t just call it un-comfy just because of that.

    Compare it to a ‘comfy’ home in the same era, which has:

    • Drafty wattle-and-daub walls and leaky thatch roof

    • Smoke filled rooms

    • Rats everywhere

    • Flea-filled floors, walls, and ceiling

    • Toilet is a hole in the ground outside

  • EinMensch@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    In this case the movie version is closer to reality than your “realistic” version. Castles were not just built for defensibility. They have a strong representative aspect. Of course they made them as nice to live in as possible. The walls were covered in tapestries or wood panelling and many rooms were heated. For unheated rooms there were movable heaters (basically small portable fire pits).

    Heres an example of a hall in a castle: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Très_Riches_Heures#/media/Datei:Les_Très_Riches_Heures_du_duc_de_Berry_Janvier.jpg

    • PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Castles were overwhelmingly built for defensibility until the 16th century, at which point you see more of a mixture of elements; and then fortresses emerging as predominantly military again in the 17th century. Royal lodgings and other such estates which would have had more amenities were generally not seriously fortified, and thus are not castles in any traditional sense.

      • EinMensch@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        You gave it exactly backwards. The castle is by definition the combination of residence and fortification. The purely military fortress only really developed after the medieval period.

        • PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not at all. The notion of a purely military fortress in the sense of being primarily for the permanent garrisoning of troops only really developed after the medieval period.

          Castles were overwhelmingly and in many polities exclusively built for defensive purposes, with the ability to reside in them being only an extension of that insofar as you can’t hold out against a siege if you can’t live there for at least a few nights. It’s why permission to build a castle in the first place is so often restricted by medieval law, requiring the direct assent of the monarch in most medieval polities.

  • MBech@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Sure the toilet is a hole in the wall, but it beats shitting in the moat.

    • PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Toilets inside the castle itself would empty into an internal cesspit, sure, but if the toilet was on the curtain walls, it probably empties into the moat anyway.

      … don’t fall in.

  • Danarchy@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have extensive experience with castles and this does not mention they are very bouncy & come with slides

  • BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    The acoustics in those castles must be horrendous too. Just shit echoing all over the damn place

  • hansolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Don’t forget that the benefit of being a noble was sleeping in a big group on a cloth covered sack of hay in some filthy flea-bitten body odor nest.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Your sack of hay is covered in cloth? Truly unbelievable luxury. We poor peasants oft cannot even afford a sack and must sleep on bare hay alone.

      And, sure, you share it with other nobles. But at least you aren’t sharing it with the pigs as well.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Just being slightly warmer will accomplish that; it can still be freezing.

      Not to mention the presence of food stores.