• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      13 days ago

      Does seem weird to keep propping up a country that’s actively fighting a trade war with us, encouraging separatism in Alberta, and openly discussing an invasion.

    • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 days ago

      Why are we buying debt of a country headed into a recession/depression and massive inflation?

      • Victor Villas@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        13 days ago

        Because we know they’ll pay it one way or another, their recession/inflation is irrelevant

        • group_hug@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          13 days ago

          A trump never pays his debts.

          He hasn’t taken over the Federal reserve, YET. If the fed loses independence and trump takes over (which he clearly wants) all bets are off.

          • Victor Villas@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 days ago

            A trump never pays his debts.

            What “a trump” does is not important, even the shittiest demagogues out there still rarely default on treasury and public debt like this. What’s way more likely is that they’ll fuck up the entire economy to pay off these debts, and use that as an excuse to cut the tiniest amount of public services and social welfare they accomplished in the last 20 years.

            A default on public debt would impact Trump personally. On those matters you can bet that he works hard to cover his ass.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 days ago

              You’re assuming he actually give a fuck about any of that. He’s going to be in the office for three more years. He doesn’t need to worry about reelections. He’s going to spend that time making as much cash for his family and friends as he can, but any means he can. He absolutely doesn’t care if he trashes the whole economy in the process.

              • Victor Villas@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                12 days ago

                I understand that, but thrashing the economy is very different from thrashing the credit rating of the whole country. But I can see how perhaps I’m still in denial, looking back it is true that this regime has been worsen than my wildest imagination in all aspects

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  I mean just look at the debacle that it the war with Iran. There’s a reason why no single US president was dumb enough to do that, but here we are now.

          • Victor Villas@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            13 days ago

            If USD is devalued over time we’ll make bank in other ways, so not concerned about that. What’s more likely is higher inflation would demand higher bond yields, which means bonds are cheaper and Canada should buy even more of them. It does mean that current bonds lose value but if we hold them to term doesn’t matter much

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              13 days ago

              This logic is dangerously complacent and ignores the actual mechanics of how economies fail. You’re assuming a smooth devaluation of the USD that conveniently boosts other assets, but that is not a guaranteed or even likely outcome at this point. An economic crash can lead to a rapid devaluation triggering a severe loss of confidence in US debt, not just higher yields on new bonds.

              If inflation spirals then the Fed would be forced to hike interest rates aggressively to defend the currency, which would crush economic growth and likely trigger a recession. The idea that holding bonds to maturity makes losses irrelevant is a fundamental misunderstanding. Those losses represent destroyed capital and a massive opportunity cost. The government would be locking in negative real returns for decades while its debt servicing costs explode on new issuance. Canada buying more cheaper bonds in that scenario is like catching a falling knife. It’s not exactly a clever investment strategy. We’d be doubling down on a failing asset as the underlying economy and fiscal position deteriorate. It’s a recipe for a stagflationary crisis.

        • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 days ago

          That’s not true. Inflation is VERY relevant. If money is losing its value then you want to have as much debt as you can because it’s worth the most right now and will be worth less when you have to repay it.

          It also means you don’t want to loan money unless the interest rate is very high or you’ll end up losing money.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          Because we know they’ll pay it one way or another

          Unless Trump manages to succeed in completely collapsing their economy. (Whether intentionally or due to incompetence)

  • vogo13@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    Friendly reminder (June 2025 article): Nearly half of national public pension plan is invested in U.S. — and only 12% in Canada

    There has been no official update or scrutiny on this close to trillion dollar investment almost a year later, which is hundreds of billions in the US. This is just one of the Canadian government’s investments that is heavily invested into the US. Hard to say that Canada is doing any actions rather than just talking with a big mouth?

    • MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 days ago

      This could be the result of a smart, passive approach. I’d be hesitant to let anyone with strong ideological investment strategies run our pension.

  • vogo13@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    Friendly reminder (June 2025 article): Nearly half of national public pension plan is invested in U.S. — and only 12% in Canada

    There has been no official update or scrutiny on this close to trillion dollar investment almost a year later, which is hundreds of billions in the US. This is just one of the Canadian government’s investments that is heavily invested into the US. Hard to say that Canada is doing any actions rather than just talking with a big mouth?

      • acargitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 days ago

        It gives us a “nuclear button” where we can threaten with massive sell-offs that could tank the value of US bonds. To counter it they would have to basically raise interest rates and/or print money. Sure it would hurt us too, but not before hurting them more. Now if you also place this in a context of coordination with other debt owners (Europeans, Chinese), we can really hurt them.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 days ago

          First question is, massive sell off to whom? Second, it’s obviously going to have a have a huge impact on our own economy. It’s not going to hurt them more because the US is a much bigger economy than us. Can you show me a historical instance of this sort of threat actually working in practice?

          If this gave any actual leverage then China would be keeping their bonds instead of doing a fire sale right now. The only countries buying up US bonds are the ones that are under the US thumb right now.

          • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            13 days ago

            First question is, massive sell off to whom?

            Any bonds that are at their due date are required to be paid out by the US treasury.

            Most holders of US bonds have a revolving collection of them, so some are coming due on a regular and continual basis.

            Admittedly, that’s not a mass sell-off, but it still puts pressure on the US if everyone starts doing it .

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              13 days ago

              Sure, if everybody started dumping US assets in a coordinated fashion that would hurt the US, we both know is not going to happen though. So, in reality Canada is simply making itself more dependent on the US. There’s no need to do mental gymnastics to pretend that this is some 4D chess.

              • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 days ago

                in reality Canada is simply making itself more dependent on the US.

                And doing so in a relatively carefully manner so as not to hurt ourselves unnecessarily.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  Making ourselves more dependent on a hostile power is precisely what’s hurting us unnecessarily. Incredible that people can’t seem to understand this.

              • acargitz@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 days ago

                I don’t pretend to know anything about international finance. I’m repeating what I’ve heard.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  It’s also worth thinking about what you hear as well. People say all kinds of things, and a lot of time it’s just nonsense. As I pointed out, if holding US debt gave any actual leverage, then China would be doing that instead of selling it off now.

    • AGM@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      You may be misunderstanding the data. This isn’t government holdings of treasuries. It’s public and private holdings, so it includes both the BoC holdings and the holdings of private investors. The government’s holdings at the BoC stayed pretty much the same over the year. The increase basically all comes from private investors, and the government can’t choose to sell their treasuries.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      That completely misses the destructive power of inflation and currency devaluation. The interest payments are nominally coming back to Canada, but their real value is what actually matters. If the US dollar is losing purchasing power faster than the bond’s interest rate, then Canada is experiencing a negative real return. We are getting paid back in dollars that buy less which is the opposite of getting stronger. What we’re seeing here is a classic transfer of wealth from the creditor to the debtor with Canada subsidizing US fiscal policy by accepting a steady erosion of its investment’s true worth.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          Your focus on the current bond overlooks the market’s forward looking nature. Yields are stable because they reflect a consensus that the Fed will eventually cut rates to avoid a recession which is a precarious assumption. The moment inflation proves stickier than expected or the US debt trajectory worsens, we could see a violent repricing happening. It would lead to a bond vigilante reaction where yields spike suddenly and crater the value of existing holdings.

          The whole idea that interest payments cushion import costs only works if the Canadian dollar doesn’t weaken alongside or faster than the USD in a crisis, and that is not at all guaranteed. When a crisis hits, all assets correlated with the US including our bond portfolio would suffer together. Meanwhile, the only sector of the US economy that’s doing well are the tech stocks, and that’s just a handful of companies passing IOU notes around in a circle. The rest of the economy is showing deep imbalances with weak consumer savings, shrinking industrial output, and persistent inflation in services.

          The US is funding massive deficits in a high interest rate environment, and that can’t go on forever. The war on Iran could act as a catalyst for the whole house of cards to come crashing down because it’s driving the price of energy through the roof. The resulting economic crash in the US could be far worse than 2008, and at that point we’d be left holding the bag.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 days ago

              We as in the working class in Canada. That’s who always pays the bill when there’s an economic crash.

              I generally agree with what you’re saying regarding the US and China. However, I’d note that the actual split is between G7 and BRICS, and BRICS have already surpassed G7 in terms of PPP measure. BRICS represents the Global South, and it happens to be where majority of human population is, where the resources are, and where most of the industry is. Majority of Global South economies economies are aligned with China now.

              What Carney appears to be focusing on are former vassal states that were under the tutelage of the US. Now that the hegemon is fading, the vassals are in trouble. What Carney seems to be trying to do is to rally Europe and Australia to form a bloc without the US, but one that’s not directly aligned with the Global South.

              And of course GDP alone is not useful measure of anything. The quality of development matters. Western economies are focused on stuff like software industry and service economy. They’re not producing things people actually need to live. China is where all the manufacturing happens. They’re the ones who build solar panels, EVs, and high speed rail that developing world needs. That’s what makes China such a key economy for the world.

              I also expect that the US is headed for collapse, and it’s likely going to be far worse than what happened to USSR. That said, it’s not at all clear that countries that hold US debt will be able to claw anything back once that happens. For one, the US is still full of nukes, so whatever states emerge out of it eventually will be nuclear powers.

              The problem for Canada is more immediate though. Our economy is heavily dependent on the US right now. And unless we diversify and become more self sufficient, then we will be dragged down along with the US. Unless Canada takes steps to insulate itself then it will become one of these failed states itself when the western order finally collapses.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 days ago

                  BRICS is more showmanship than substance.

                  Yeah, that’s just completely false. The whole point of BRICS, and what actually makes it effective unlike G7, is that it’s not an ideological alliance. It’s a framework for countries to do trade. And trade within BRICS has been exploding.

                  Meanwhile, the EU is very clearly dying at this point. Energy prices were already sending European industry into a terminal decline, and Iran war has put the whole thing into an overdrive. Not to mention the fertilizer crisis during the planting season which could easily result in food shortages by fall. GDP is a completely meaningless metric because the quality of development is what matters. European countries do not produce things their people need to live. And what’s actually happening in Europe right now is that nationalist parties like AfD, RN, and Reform are dominating their politics. All these parties are extremely nationalist, and they are openly hostile to the whole idea of EU. The liberal center in Europe is collapsing along with the standard of living.