I mean Europeans are already buying most of their diesel from the US aren’t they?

Marxism isn’t utopian lmfao. Go read a book ffs.

There was no mass support. The US was cultivating a proto color revolution, a formula that’s been used time and again since then. What we do know is that in cases where there was no crackdown on Western funded reactionaries, then we got outcomes like in Chile. Thinking that this was some organic movement is frankly absurd. Also, can read up on precisely the tactics used, and how they have direct lineage in nazi propaganda https://november8ph.ca/psychological-warfare-in-the-strategy-of-imperialism-v-l-artemov/

Plenty of people already did in this very thread dumbo.

Exactly, it’s obviously not done for any sort of humanitarian reasons.

Oh so what happened was that the banderites captured some DPRK soldiers and made a secret deal with occupied Korea to send them over. Then the green goblin started bragging about it which created tensions with DPRK, so occupied Korea is furious about it. And they got a non apology from the banderites, so apparently that was the last straw even for them.

isn’t it SpaceXSI now 🤣

The funniest part about the whole tankie thing is that it was coined by British reactionaries in response to the suppression of a counter-revolution in Hungary, which has now been revealed to be a CIA op.

Wrong, liberalism is fundamentally a right wing ideology. Full stop. https://dialecticaldispatches.substack.com/p/the-dialectics-of-domination

The whole >90% of territory never saw a foot of German soldier was not where most of the destroyed urban housing stock stood. The war destroyed over 1,700 towns and 70,000 villages, which was roughly half the urban housing stock in the most populated and industrial regions, and left about 25 million people homeless.

Many houses were built by workers in their spare time after work, on a land granted by the state and using construction materials provided by the factory or plant they worked at, but that was a supplement to state reconstruction, not proof that war ruin was secondary.

The barracks aging is precisely what created the need for khrushchevkas in late 50s and early 60s onwards. Then brezhnevki with some improvements over bare minimal comfort of previous gen, and eventually from 70s onwards to the end of soviets the massive prefab took hold. There were countless experimental projects at different times and in different configurations, from 3 storey alpha builds of Khrushchevkas to Kyiv’s Podil 4 blocks project of late 80s, but all of it was a response to the war-created housing deficit, not a response to industrialization alone as you falsely claim.

Aggressive industrialization wasn’t the fundamental explanation for the scale and duration of the postwar housing construction program. Wartime destruction was the main driver.

It really helps to actually learn about the subjects before you start braying about them.

This Vancouver? https://www.columbian.com/news/2026/aug/19/share-encampment-cleanup-leaves-many-who-are-homeless-looking-for-shelter-answers/

keep malding fash

indeed

Laos doesn’t get much attention because they haven’t had much chance to develop after the US razed the whole country to the ground and left a bunch of mines and unexploded ordinance that are still being removed to this day. But they do have a communist party in charge, and China has been actively helping them recently.

and by most people you mean most liberals whose brains haven’t yet developed capacity for critical thinking

don’t forget DPRK and Laos

Seriously, I find there are just a handful of tropes libs regurgitate like trained parrots. You really can just have a templated response to them.

Yup, that’s the definition.