With support ending for Windows 10, the most popular desktop operating system in the world currently, possibly 240 million pcs may be sent to the landfill. This is mostly due to Windows 11’s exorbitant requirements. This will most likely result in many pcs being immediately outdated, and prone to viruses. GNU/Linux may be these computers’ only secure hope, what do you think?

    • Kumatomic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I mean stopping Windows updates is really more a win than a loss half the time. They’ve forcefully installed so much of the shitware in Windows 10 updates that makes Windows 11 awful. It took me an hour to strip all the bullshit off of my partner’s Windows 10 that he left to auto-update.

    • cannache@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Agreed. There usually needs to be a big demand for a shift. Kind of like with Android development. Things tend to slow down once they run out of good ideas.

      For Microsoft I think the next big move could be for a whole solar system calendar, e.g. symmetry 454, then synchronise that with a local family/group calendars, social events integration etc, throw in something like bing coin, then throwing it all into a big new multi compatible platform available to all of XP, 7, 10 and 11, add some games shit in there to compete with steam deck, then throw in some hardware CPU cooling accessories to prop up the trash software until they spend the next ten years updating like Lenovo bridge, it so that they can let optimizing their software enough to not fuck things up.

      As for how the hell they plan on making money from it all, I suspect that the accessories will eventually lead to subscription costs for certain OEM support. This will encourage OEM manufacturers to engage directly with consumers and retailers to invest in the recycling process so that they can jack up prices across the board.

      Use this money to add their shit into some NASA computers for extra hype. No big long term plan, just getting their logo and their foot in the door with the next big direction for computing lol

  • Alph4d0g@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    That’s the MS business model in partnership with PC makers. It’s a juggernaut. They’ve operationalized it.

  • AnonTwo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    …What does the writer think support end means? Microsoft bricks the PC as soon as the support period ends?

    They’re going to just keep using Windows 10, security be damned. Probably a good number of users who weren’t keeping their PC up to date even when Microsoft was forcing updates on them.

  • bartolomeo@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    If these were all stacked laptops, stacked on top of each other, they would form a stack 600 km above the Moon.

    Ummm… what??

    Assuming 3 cm thick laptop x 240 mil = 7,200 km. Moon is on average 380,000 km away. Even 30 cm thick laptops (lol) would only get you to 72,000 km.

  • Sarcasmo220@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    What if, sometime after Win 10 loses support a virus takes advantage of the lack of patches and propagates across all the machines with a simple message “This operating system is no longer supported, please click here to upgrade.” The button then runs a script to download and install a user friendly Linux distro. The world is then saved.

  • Marxism-Fennekinism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    We all know that won’t happen because most users don’t give a shit about things like conserving hardware or the resources that went into making them, and will just use this as an excuse to splurge on the latest shiny device.

      • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Herein lies the rub where the discourse online always fails. It’s easy to blame the rich, corporations, politicians, etc. but the end of the day they’re simply doing what the masses want. We are the problem.

        Now that said, I understand the appeal of blaming a smaller segment of the population because it’s easier to shift blame and it’s easier to force change that way, but rest assured Apple stops making a new phone every year their brand dies unless everyone stops doing it. They’re doing it because we are conditioned to want it.

        We are the underlying problem. All of us.

        Edit - having my point proven is amazing.

        • InputZero@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          If you’re saying everyone is providing your point, I think you disproved your own point.

          They’re doing it because we are conditioned to want it.

          Conditioning a behavior is basic psych101. It’s a controlled external stimulus which illicits a desirable action from the subject. So a conditioned consumer is subject to external stimulie which illicits them to spend. I wouldn’t blame the subject here, I’d blame the one doing the conditioning.

          Regardless of all that, you are right but so wrong. We are all to blame, but I mean corporations and us. Politicians and the oligarchs aren’t responsible for what you or I do. What they are responsible for is manipulating systems to benefit themselves over the interests of the general public.

          Since politicians and the business elite wield so much influence that makes them more responsible than you or I who really can’t make a big difference on our own. You’re blaming the proletariat for being the proletariat, but we don’t choose whether or not we are. You can work as hard as you can your entire life and you’ll never amount to the level of power and influence Elon, Jeff, Mark, Bill, or Steve had/have.

        • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Nah, that’s shit. We are not the problem. The people in this thread don’t seem to be the kind of people to go out and buy the latest device every 6 months. I keep my phones for years until either the performance or battery becomes nearly unusable for me. I install Linux on older hardware (and newer hardware) and buy new hardware when necessary, not every time it comes out.

          You can blame the average person, sure, but saying all of us is just incorrect.

        • krolden@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          fuck me harder ms yes daddy yes please mmmm thats good keep going harder harder HARDER YES

          fr tho, that ‘smaller segment of the population’ owns the means of production/computation. so yes, I do blame them. and so should you and anyone with more that a couple folds in their brain.

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Microsoft: Arbitrarily increases the system requirements for Windows 11 even though it runs perfectly fine on older pcs just to get people to buy new computers

    Also Microsoft: Why’s there so much waste??

    • Liz@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I found it absolutely amazing they claim my pretty decent laptop from 2016 can’t run Windows 11. Laptops haven’t gotten that much better since then. Also, supposing it actually couldn’t, it’s a fucking operating system. It should be doing everything it can to stay out of the way. What kind of bloated monstrosity is Windows 11 that my laptop can’t run it?

  • BaldProphet@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The problem is most people don’t have the technical ability or interest in switching to Linux. Here is the solution:

    1. We, as Linux users, must be better advocates for the platform to untechnical people.
    2. We should make ourselves available to help people make the transition.
    • Deebster@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      It is far too confusing what to use - even as someone who uses Linux on various servers, a media centre, WSL and used to run a Gentoo laptop I still don’t know which distro to use, let alone which of KDE/Gnome, X11/Wayland, init/systemd etc.

      • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        just try one in a vm?

        also, most of the differences are not that big, any one of them will work fine for most people.

    • Footnote2669@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Maybe there should be a centralised GitXXX documentation „Windows to Linux” with everything from choosing a distro to troubleshooting and links to appropriate wikis. There are so many guides/blogs, each saying something different

      • Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        There have been. Creating another one creates another one. Not that someone shouldn’t, but it will always be one among many.

  • leanleft@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    i pretty much dont give a fuck what companies do.
    except its hella destructive/wastefull to the environment… and also will probably drive up the price of computers for everyone.

  • uphillbothways@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Capitalism must feed. And, if we don’t give them huge electronics landfills to search for scrap, what are our children and grandchildren going to do for work?

  • leanleft@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    important tldr summary: “Many Windows 10 computers do not meet the Windows 11 system requirements”

  • Mio@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I think Microsoft should actually be forced to either extend support or give the user one option to be secured. With the later I mean pay for license or click here to automatically choose a Linux distro that the user will be migrated to. It could be Mint or one of MS own Linux distribution with OneDrive preinstalled and links to Office 365 online word. Even install Android could be one option.

    This is better than getting all the devices on the landfill.

    Remember that 99% don’t know what to do with their computer or are lazy. One easy fix should be available.

    • lhamil64@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m guessing it’d be cheaper for MS to just keep providing security updates for Win10 than to create a whole Linux distro…

      • Mio@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It probably is. But MS choose how they want to keep the control of the users. But just leaving them like this is just bad. I feel EU should force them to give a solution since the computer came with Windows so it is their responsibility.

        One alternative is to give them Chrome OS, or they might prefer building their of version of it.

        Today I see a computer as end of life when it is to slow to view webpages. Often like when it is to little RAM available or the CPU is really too slow. Then I think Microsoft could stop caring about it.