• PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    My favorite story from the bible is when Jesus storms into a temple and starts whipping the living shit out of everyone as they were counting gold and their riches. Jesus was a god damn socialist hero.

    • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      My favourite is 2 kings chapter 2 verse 22-25

      From there Elisha went up to Bethel. As he was walking along the road, some boys came out of the town and jeeredb at him. “Get out of here, baldy!” they said. “Get out of here, baldy!” He turned around, looked at them and called down a curse on them in the named of the Lord. Then two bears came out of the woods and mauled forty-two of the boys.

      God really hates children.

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        From what I’ve read, which admittedly isn’t much, he seems to hold entire families to account for the actions of their worst members.

        Often that means killing/maiming/punishing children of jerks and profiteering gluttons.

        • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          For sure and not just families. I’m sure nearly every English speaker has heard the story of Egypt and the 10 plagues.

          We have to remember, its a choice they made. I mean, they’re god. They can do anything right? God could’ve just teleported the Israelites away. He could’ve just made the Egyptians temporarily blind or fall asleep for a few months, keeping them alive while doing so. He could’ve given all the Israelites individual flaming chariots. He could’ve made flaming rail infrastructure and run a flaming railway service for the Israelites to leave on.

          “No, I told you already. Its child murder or nothing, Moses.”

  • Muffi@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    And The Quran is super anti-banking. Most religions have been twisted away from their original meaning, to become tools of our oppressors.

    • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The Quran is not anti-banking per say. It is anti interests, anti predatory and scamming businesses and anti crime financing, which the Torah and the Bible are too. Problem is for Islamic banks it is practically impossible to participate in the global finance system without also being exposed to interest.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_banking_and_finance

      For Jews eventually the discourse shifted that they first allowed seeking interests from non Jews and eventually from everyone, despite the Torah being clear about it.

      The sinful business practices of the time were one of the main things Jesus challenged according to the Bible, but Christianity has always been very flexible with interpreting the life and teachings of Jesus.

  • ameancow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    SUDDENLY THE BIBLE REQUIRES TRANSLATION INTO TODAY’S CONTEXT AND TERMS HUH

    These fuckers will scream the bible can’t be wrong when it comes to judging others but the moment they realize Jesus asked them to do something for other people and not just scream at people who look different, now all of a suddenly, we need to define what the term “riches” mean and we have to take into account it’s a 4000 year old work, etc. etc.

    • A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      They love to cite the parts of Leviticus that condemn homosexual behavior, but suddenly when Leviticus starts telling you where to get your slaves and how cruel you should be, it’s “but that’s the Old Testament!! 🤓☝️”

    • GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      This doesn’t even touch the part shortly after this verse about a couple that lied about giving everything to the church and god opened up the earth to swallow them for bucking the socialist system.

  • crimsoncobalt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Here’s another one:

    23 Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven. 24 Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.”

    Matthew 19:23-24

    The “eye of a needle” referenced here was a small opening in the city walls meant to reduce traffic for security. A camel piled up with goods would would have a difficult time passing through it.

    For full context, check out Matthew 19:16-28: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew 19&version=NIV

    Edit: as others have pointed out, there isn’t any good evidence about the “eye of a needle” metaphor. I heard this from my pastor at church when I was a kid and it sounds like he was mistaken. I wonder what else he got wrong…

    • ItDoBeHowItDoBe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      What I think is important here, and what is seems many in the comments below are missing out on, is that Jesus says that it is hard, not impossible. Giving all your money away will not suddenly make you a good person, just as never having had money does not mean you are a good person. Jesus charged his followers with living lives of self sacrifice on the behalf of others in all aspects. Annias and saphira did not drop dead because they did not give up their goods but because they lied about it. I know many Christians who have done very well financially and are the most generous people I know. I also know some who are very stingy and uncompassionate with their money. The fact is, those who have more, have more that they have to give up. Those who have less, have less to give up. Each, however, is charged to live in the same manner.

      God asks us to give freely and abundantly as he does. This is not forced upon us, though. There is no forcing someone to obey certian things in Christianity. Jesus says that is we love him, we will keep his commands. Those who choose not to keep his commands are demonstrating a greater love for whatever the opposite is at that time. Love involves choice, though. It is not a socialists ideology enforced upon every person. A perfect christian community would look socialistic but would arrive there through the perfect love of one’s neighbors. Unfortunately, we do not live in a world of perfect Christians whose every decision is fuled by the love of others. I would also suspect that many, if not most on here, would have a problem with Christians forcing upon others their beliefs so as to attempt to achieve this. That, however, is what would be happening if someone forced upon others a socialists society without their consent.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        No, he says it’s impossible. Because the needle wasn’t a gate, it was a needle. And that’s really clear from the quote in context:

        Matthew 19:21-24

        Jesus answered, “If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.” When the young man heard this, he went away sad, because he had great wealth. Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven. Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.”

        He was really, really clear on this. Do not be rich. The only way he could have been clearer is if he had literally said, “do not be rich.” Oh wait, he pretty much did say that.

        Luke 6:20

        And he lifted up his eyes on his disciples, and said: “Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God.

        But come on, he didn’t say that you should be dirt poor. Like you can still have some nice stuff, right? That thing in Matthew was metaphorical, right?

        Like 18:22

        When Jesus heard this, he said to him, “One thing you still lack. Sell all that you have and distribute to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me.”

        Fuck.

        • ItDoBeHowItDoBe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          He never said it was impossible. He clearly says it is hard. When Jesus says to the rich young ruler to sell all he had and give to the poor and follow him, he is not saying to quit your high paying job that made you rich in the first place. He is saying to radically change the way you are living to benifit those around you. We make idols of things all around us. Many make idols of money. Some, though difficult, are able to continue to make a lot of money while simultaneously giving it away for the betterment of those around them. What I was trying to point out is that those who make a lot of money are not the enemy, but those who horde what they have to the detriment of the love of God and man.

    • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      And between believers of the faith. Context for the verse makes you understand that these people were not just just knowing each other, they were inside a fellowship. They know each other intimately, not just a bunch of unknown people sharing just because

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah its like a big family, and we are all socialists when you get down to a smaller group of our family or community.

  • qooqie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    So they justify not being socialist according to this verse by the word believers. They don’t want to share with non-believers or even believers of other denominations (they are also non-believers since they aren’t exactly the same). So they can be non-socialist and just tithe and think it’s fine

    • GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The tithe is an Old Testament standard. The New Testament says that they should give whatever the pastor asks. If the pastor asks for 30%, they are theologically supposed to give 30%.

      • ItDoBeHowItDoBe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        There is actually nothing in the bible about giving in accordance to what a “pastor” says. I am not sure where you got that from. While you are correct that the “tithe” as described in the OT no longer applies because we are not giveing to the temple, Jesus’ command is to give freely, abundantly, and sacrificially out if s cheerful heart. The jews at Jesus’ time would have actually given a good bit more than 10% because of the various annual festivals that also required a percent to be given. What they were giving was in support of the upkeep of the temple and the priestly line who was prohibited from working elsewhere. For Christians, there is no priestly line. We have two offices according to the NT, Elder and deacon. Neither of these are entitled to financial compensation because of the title. Where we get that we should compensate them for their work from the command that a laborers should not be without his wages, and many pastors are doing work that amounts to a full time job. The fact of the matter right now is that most “pastors” across the world are bivocational meaning that they hold other jobs if time allows.

        • booly@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          There is actually nothing in the bible about giving in accordance to what a “pastor” says. I am not sure where you got that from.

          Gonna go out on a limb here and say they were told this by their “pastor.”

          • ItDoBeHowItDoBe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Nope. I actually came up with that on my own after reading the bible. Many “pastors” still preach the whole tithing thing, though.

  • duderium2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Last time I checked, liberals also worshipped private property like a god, so doesn’t this meme also apply to them?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          So basically no one here in a community about authoritarianism and also not something anyone here would approve of?

          Maybe you’re getting irate at the wrong group.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              This is not about me nor what I believe. However, even if I did believe that one person should be allowed to rent their home to someone else, that doesn’t mean I worship private property like a god.

              ‘Worship’ and ‘god’ are words that have meanings. Perhaps you should look them up if you think ‘believes someone should be legally allowed to rent their home to someone else’ applies to either word.

              • duderium2@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                So if a landlord uses the police to throw a single mom out of her home because she can’t pay rent, how is that not authoritarianism?

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Sorry, you’re moving the goalposts now. This was about worshiping property as a god.

                  Is believing that someone can rent their home to someone else worshiping property as a god? If so, please define ‘worship’ and ‘god’ as they apply to this context.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Most people asking these questions were raised by one or more christians. The failure of religious organizations to answer to their own ideals is the primary reason people leave a religion.

      Example: Christians worshipping somebody as immoral and hateful as trump is driving people away from the religion.

      • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Your example doesn’t make sense because Christians worship Christ.