I was reviewing some PowerShell script today and it was absolutely atrocious. It's only saving grace was that it was using actual PowerShell, not some hacky wmic call or anything.
I didn't write it and I'm really glad for that. Whole lines of rewritten code commented out and just left there. Entire lines of # marks. There's no reason this should be so densely commented. Your code should be self explanatory.
There were multiple queries to the same database that was then passed through a "where-object" selector by pipe, looking for a single value (pulling a database of thousands of entries for one line).
It was disgusting.
I'm not even a developer and I thought it was horrid.
Just like people dying in T-bone or head-on collisions. Not to mention rollovers and other crashes.
Each of them carries the chance of fatality.
It's unpredictable, which is why we can't eliminate fatalities entirely.
My most recent point is that even the fatalities from being rear-ended are significantly reduced from even 10-15 years ago. Making the small (but still too high) probability of a fatality from that type of crash, smaller (but still too high).
Therefore, the most likely outcome from such an incident would be the destruction of property, not loss of life.
Which is the original point I was being pedantic about. The original comment was that stopping and not driving wouldn't kill anyone, and the reply that kicked off this insane tangent, was that the people behind might.
And I'm staying, no, they won't die (it is statistically very unlikely).
I think that to make an adequate determination of that, we would have to know what they did vote for.
Sure, we can infer it's probably not a higher grocery bill, but that's what they didn't vote for.
We need to know what they did vote for and whether it relates to the situation at hand.
Since their motives for voting how they did are impossible to know from this individual post, we would be unable to make an adequate judgement call as to how LAMF, or LAMF adjacent this might, or might not be.
So everything we're saying now is conjecture and opinion.
Why? If people think this is an acceptable situation to go ahead and drive in, then people are going to get hurt or killed.
How calm should I be about driver's being so irresponsible that they endanger themselves and everyone around them because "lol, what was I supposed to do?!?" .... Exactly?
Can't see? Don't drive. It's not fucking rocket surgery.
Weird how language works. There's so many words for so many things but I certainly can't think of anything that could express "permanently paused" in a better, more concise way....
This is exactly what I was trying to say. Someone single making $200k might think, well, I'm not struggling at all, maybe I'm on the rich side?..... No, they wouldn't be rich there either.
$200k/yr is nothing compared to the fat cats on top.
Even double that, you're still much much closer to begging for quarters in the go station than deciding what yacht to buy next....
The amount of money the rich have extorted from the rest of us is unfathomable.
I kind of like this. When I'm searching for how to do something, I probably don't want your entire codebase, just don't snippet that does the thing.
I'll probably need to modify it so the thing works in a specific way, so I can make what I need to make.
Usually I just need a point in the right direction and I can assemble the rest.