This story seems to have faded in the wake of events ad nauseam. We are all aware of Senor Luigi. However, most folks can’t recall the full name of the guy that allegedly Luigi gunned down. Mission accomplished.

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Takes a while to get a jury together. The legal system is very slow, even in easy cases; and trying to find an unbiased jury makes it even harder.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      28 minutes ago

      they will go through a ton of jurors before they will seat one. they needs one dumb enough to be swayed easily by either side. both the defendant and prosecutors are only limited to amount of jurors that strike from a group during jury summons, so they are looking at biases for him and remove them. what they really want is the ones that dont read the news much, or retireers.

    • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 hours ago

      There will be no truly unbiased jury, this is way too public and polarizing

      Fucking CB radio featured Luigi and that’s an impenetrable subculture

  • Ileftreddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I still don’t think it’s even Luigi that did it. Looks nothing like the guy from the video

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Classic oligarchs, pinning their crimes on the underprivileged…

        Rich white males from prestigious families? Hang on, wait a minute.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          That’s a fair point but it is the state’ job to prove their case to throw a jury and their dragging feet and doing fucky shit. After spending a month or two litigating the case in media.

          They acted like it was a proven fact that he did it… They gonna need to convince the public now beyond chain of trust me bros

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 hours ago

            TBF there is a lot of evidence against him, such as his social media history, book reviews about how “protesting doesn’t work”, the murder weapon and bag full of $20k, complete lack of alibi, and his traveling in the opposite direction of the crime discreetly by hopping bus to bus.

  • Makeshift@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I don’t watch mainstream media, but Status Coup News does follow his case and updates when something happens.

    From what I understand, lawyers found a major issue with how he was apprehended. Apparently he wasn’t read his rights before they started taking action, so a fair bit of evidence they have against him may need to be thrown out.

    Also they decided to pursue the death penalty way too fast, among other injustices.

  • TachyonTele@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    152
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Nothing’s happened, that’s why. His next court date is:

    Tuesday, 9/16, 9 a.m.: People v. Mangione (NY State), 100 Centre Street, Part 32, New York, NY 10013

    • thelivefive@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I know it’s just how the courts work but how can it be the people vs him when the people seem to support him. The state vs maybe.

      • NOFF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        because alleged criminals are prosecuted by the State on behalf of the People. Public opinion doesn’t really factor into it.

      • shplane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 hours ago

        People on Lemmy, sure. But talk to your boomer neighbors and they’ll all say he’s a terrorist.

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          34 minutes ago

          they all got redirected by the MSMs. there is big support him on other social media, but onl boomers and Xers watch cnn and fox, so they are against him.

  • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Nobody really cares about the guy who died, despite corporate media insisting on our sympathy for months. They figured out we can’t be fucked about the sorry sonofabitch, so they’re hoping we forget about the whole business while trying to censor talk of LM off of all major social media platforms. Sure does help that so much news and social media are owned by the same fuckers.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      50 minutes ago

      Corporations already forgot about the dead CEO shortly after they replaced him and the new guy presided over stock value decreases and lowered forecasts. The only people that care now is the press looking to generate views with sensational news and district attorneys or AG’s trying to please their wealthy overlords for reelection.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      33 minutes ago

      the head ceo witty and hemsely sure dint care either. one of the reason is that UHG was under insider trading investigation, and thompson posed a potential threat to them.

  • Bort@hilariouschaos.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    19 hours ago

    The media understands that giving him any exposure will make people think about his motives, and might generate similar acts from others. The best strategy to keep people from “looking up” instead of looking left/right is to not expose anyone to the idea.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      36 minutes ago

      it took them over a month to reorient the right wingers against luigi. also reddit was silencing the news early on around the time he got caught.

    • Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      16 hours ago

      With that strategy, it makes you wonder why they relentlessly cover school shootings. (It could also be that they keep happening, and it’s actually different every time)

      • Ænima@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        They glorify mass shootings to perpetuate more mass shootings. There are many mass shooters who cite other mass shooters as their reason to do a mass shootings. A lot of independent groups no longer show names or say the name of the perpetrator, only their victims, as a result of that trend.

      • Lag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Because school shootings are us fighting each other and not the rich.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The way school shootings get treated v Luigi case… Is very telling about what the regime really cares about

          It working people crotch fruit that’s for damn sure unless they are seeking another rape victim that is.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Speaking of media coverage, notice how when an AR-15 is used they always state so, usually in the headline. A shooting with any other gun? Nah.

        Remember the vet who went nuts in Maine and murdered a bunch of people? I had to dig to find what weapon he used. It was an AR-10. Know what an AR-10 is? Most folks have never heard of one. (It’s basically an AR-15.)

        Now why in the world would our billionaire media owners want to turn our opinion against the best multipurpose rifle in the world?

        Anyway, what was the original post about?

        • Cptn_Slow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          Oh buddy, hold on! You’re about to get nuked for saying something positive about guns!

          Edit: FWIW I agree entirely!

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I kind of don’t care or want to know. I was enjoying the absence of discussion of his nonimpact.

    • 6stringringer@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 minutes ago

      Apparently there was some impact or else this post would not have received an upvote. Perhaps you have other things on your mind. That is completely ok. Btw, by commenting you kinda outed yourself as someone that does care. At lest to some degree.

    • c1a5s1c@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’ll say the same thing when you get falsely busted for stealing a pack of doritos with questionable evidence

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Nice Mao Zedong / John Cena profile pic, is that satire or praise?

        If I can’t provide an allibi for the great dorito heist of 2026 and they find the dorritos in my possession then I guess thats the end of it, don’t try to martyr me to a bunch of lawless assholes.