i’ve been reading thru hexbear’s code of conduct to make sure i don’t break any rules and one part of it confused me a bit. in the “topics that must be CW’d” section, one of the bullet points says the following:
“Violence towards animals or humans such as corpses and carnist products…”
in what context would you CW something with carnist products in them? is mentioning non vegan food by itself fine? does it apply to images or to text too? in what case would a comment/ post be removed to enforce this rule? i am not vegan (will go vegan eventually, i’m still adjusting to eating less meat) so i’m not sure how to follow the rule. any help is appreciated.
The main point for understanding the majority of the rules is to ask yourself, does this alienate a comrade? We have several vegan comrades on the site.
Removed by mod
We got the rule because some of us would like a space where you’re warned before someone shows you gore.
Removed by mod
Just because the picture is of the corpse of one of the few animals you’ve been brainwashed to show apathy for doesn’t mean it’s not a corpse. I don’t see “a cheeseburger” I see a pile of fucking gore. You would too if you’d take off the blinders.
Removed by mod
What the fuck is your problem? Quit this bad faith fucking anti-vegan trolling, asshole.
i genuinely couldn’t tell the difference between what you were saying and someone doing a caricature. like i said, it costs nothing to cw the cheeseburger. i don’t mind cw-ing the cheeseburger.
You know that reflects poorly on you, not me, right? Read theory.
Of course it is??? In what world is a charred, minced corpse not a depiction of violence. The fact that doesn’t even register as violence to you is heartbreaking.
gore is like blood and guts.
’s neck was gorey. a mortal kombat fatality is gorey. it’s not even a carcass, much less showing the slaughter or butchering.
Been a while since I’ve seen a Hexbear self-destruct in the name of anti-veganism.
not trying to be anti-vegan any more than simply not agreeing is taken as “anti”, this is apparently a semantic disagreement about what “gore” means.