• blady_blah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Except it’s their kids who are impacted are the ones we feel bad for, not them. (and I know their own kids could be considered as part of a Darwin award through a strict interpretation, but I’d rather not.)

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        If they have kids that survive, they are ineligible for a Darwin. The award is about ending their line in a stupid way, not just dying.

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          which is why if they take their kids with them, they technically should be eligible again.