• Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    The campaigns to ban video games by Christian groups is one of the biggest examples of cancel culture in modern times.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        The 90’s weren’t that long ago to some of us. But yes, in the 80’s and 90’s they rallied hard against music, and in the 90’s and early 2000’s against video games. Something positive did come out of it though. Music albums and video games didn’t have maturity ratings before all of that campaigning from the Christian Coalition. As a parent it’s nice to have a rating flag, so you know to check the content and see if you think it’s appropriate for your children.

        • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          My brother in Christ, I don’t know what planet you live on, but here on Earth, that was 30 years ago no matter where you live. And to my knowledge, none of the games and/or bands actually got cancelled because of it except on an individual basis (i.e. if you parents forbid you to have them at home). But in that case, we simply went to a friend’s house to play or listen to them there, so I’m not sure that this is really something worth getting all worked up over.

          • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            1990 was 34 years ago, but 1999 was only 25 years ago. When you get older, 25 years doesn’t seem like that long ago. I’m not sure if you’re implying that I’m getting worked up in your last sentence, but I’m not. I simply stated an observation. As far as the Christian Coalition, yes, they got really worked up.

            Tons of albums were banned. 2 Live Crew had almost every one of their albums banned at one point or another. License to Ill by the Beasty Boys was banned. Everything from Too Short was banned. Tons of music was banned either from the radio, the record stores, or both. People went to jail over it. It was a big deal. Thankfully a lot of those bands sued and appealed, and moved the meter for artistic expression considerably, from then forwards.

      • drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Never fails, Christians (ostensibly “”““real””“” ones lol) always go to this, such a convenient out for rancid, unserious, responsibility denying dingdongs

      • teejay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Why is this getting upvoted? OP is using irony. The No True Scotsman fallacy requires refuting a counterexample as well as “The modification is signalled by the use of non-substantive rhetoric such as “true”, “pure”, “genuine”, “authentic”, “real”, etc.” Check out the “Occurrence” section.

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Why is this getting upvoted?

          Because there are people who really don’t like how right wing conservative Christians behave, but also for some reason hate when other Christians agree that the behaviour is unacceptable and call them out on it.

          • EndlessApollo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            You’re not calling out shit. You’re refusing any responsibility by claiming they’re not even really Christian. They are, and until you admit that, nobody gives a fuck about your claims to the contrary. Christians can be shit, that doesn’t make them not Christian you absolute dingus. If you’d actually read the Bible you’d know that slavery and homophobia and sexism are as fundamentally Christian as any love thy neighbor shit

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Republicans: Act in hateful ways

              Guy: “That behavior is contrary to the book you claim to follow”

              Everyone: cheers

              Christian: “I agree!”

              You: “nO tRuE sCoTsMaN!!!1!”

              • EndlessApollo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                ???

                You suck at telling stories like this lmao, you’re the one no true scotsmaning shitty Christians to try and avoid any flak for being associated with them. Legit this comment is utterly incomprehensible, tf is your point? Who’s guy? Who’s everyone? I assure you far from everyone thinks that republicans aren’t real Christians

                • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Let me simplify it for you:

                  The argument that everyone who claims to be a Christian is a Christian, and also every Christian belongs to the same group and is responsible for the actions of everyone who claims to be a Christian, is patently absurd.

                  You can have two people with wildly different beliefs, but if they both use the label Christian somehow they are both responsible for the actions of each other.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        If I call myself a Scotsman, despite not meeting the definition of a Scotsman (never been to Scotland, have no Scottish heritage) then it would be fair to call me not a “True Scotsman.”

        If the definition of “Christian” is “someone who follows the teachings of Jesus” then someone who spreads hate does not meet that definition.

        If the definition of “Christian” is “anyone who calls themselves a Christian” then the definition is so broad it is useless as a descriptor. It includes someone who is loving and caring, and someone who abuses and murders anyone they disagree with. It tells you nothing about the individual or how they behave.

        • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          If the definition of “Christian” is “someone who follows the teachings of Jesus”

          If that’s your definition then there are no Christians.

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            If that’s your definition then there are no Christians.

            Ok, so you’re going with the word is useless as a descriptor.

              • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                No, I’m saying that christians are people who claim to be christian.

                As I said, useless as a descriptor. By that definition the word “Christian” includes someone who donates time to charities, as well as someone who spreads hate about immigrants, wants them sent back to their own countries, and wants to bomb those countries.

                The word “Christian” could be applied to a person that wants to take away a woman’s right to medical care, and to a person that is pro-choice.

                Hell, the word “Christian” could apply to someone who has never set foot inside a church, has never seen a Bible, and has no idea what’s even in it, as long as they “claim they are a Christian.”

                By that definition if I tell you someone is a Christian it doesn’t tell you if that person loves Trans people or hates them. As I said, a useless descriptor.

        • drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Incredibly convenient thing for “polite Christians” (read: enablers) to say while the overwhelmingly powerful structure borne of their freely given money, time, and prejudices ruins the country.

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Replace the word “Christian” with “American” and your statement is just as valid.

    • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago
      • Attend Churches where pastors and preachers proselytize about anything “Sinful”
      • Call themselves Christian proudly
      • Wears crosses
      • Says its forbidden by God to do something that the Bible says is bad
      • Uses the words of Saint Paul to expand on those words

      Damn that sounds like they are Christian, but you know, I guess they’re “not true Christians” because they happen to do everything on Saturday instead of Sunday, or don’t wash the feet of the poor, or something else that caused a schism 200 years ago.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Weird. None of that actually mentions Jeeeeeeesus or the things he supposedly said and did.

        Weird how all the hate comes from things the apparent Son of God didn’t do, but they chose to believe in those things instead.

        It’s like they’re hypocrites. False shepards.

        Fake Christians.

        • EndlessApollo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          This staunch denial of any responsibility for other shitty Christians is why nobody likes or respects you. Do something about other hateful Christians, don’t just fucking deny that they exist. Pathetic

            • EndlessApollo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Oh, so you’re just a troll who wants to piss everyone off. You were kinda doing an OK job, but now it’s way too obvious. I hope this shit gets tired for you some day💖

              • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Sure bro. Because there aren’t atheists who have noticed the discrepancy between the messaging in the Gospel, the rest of the Bible, and what parts bigots love to point to and what they love to ignore, and they can’t possibly think some kinds of theists are worse than others

                Ya clown.

    • 01011@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      A lot more than just American xtians. There are countries where people cannot get safe, legal abortions because of the stranglehold that xtians have on the political class. Likewise access to contraceptives and even basic reproductive education within the school system. The Roman Catholic Church has been far more destructive than American xtians.