cross-posted from: https://lemmy.crimedad.work/post/174046

Trump would not elaborate on what he meant by his threat — first announced on social media in early December — that “all hell will break out” if a deal is not made.

“It will not be good for Hamas, and it will not be good, frankly, for anyone,” Trump said.

I wonder if he’s implying that this threat includes Israel. I’m probably being too hopeful, but maybe the Trump administration will actually compel Israel to negotiate a deal. It wouldn’t be the first time a Republican president reined in Israel.

    • naeap@sopuli.xyz
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 个月前

      Yeah, that’s why Hamas aren’t giving out the list of still alive hostages.
      Obviously there aren’t any left

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 个月前

        What do you think would happen if Hamas came out with a list that said:

        So many have been killed in bombings, this many were killed while running towards Israeli troops, and those all died because of lack of food, water and/or medicine.

        • naeap@sopuli.xyz
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 个月前

          If the signal of the message can be traced, Israel would probably bomb it

          Didn’t say it would make any difference

  • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 个月前

    I’m probably being too hopeful

    They are. Trump likes to make statements that he thinks sound “strong”, and that’s all that “and it will not be good, frankly, for anyone” was. He didn’t actually have any intention or meaning behind it, he’s just pandering to his faux-masculine base who like hearing threats made because threatening people is “manly” in their minds.

  • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 个月前

    Trump would not elaborate on what he meant by his threat

    That’s on-brand for him.

    It’s just vague posturing. A concept of a plan for a threat at most.

    • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 个月前

      Here’s had an Iranian general killed in his own country. It’s all posturing until it isn’t, which is a big part of the problem. Whish is pointless rambling and which is a legitimate threat?

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 个月前

    Mob boss wannabe using mob boss wannabe tactics to pretend he’s solving anything, completely ignoring the facts around him