The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 年前The grand prizelemmy.worldimagemessage-square137linkfedilinkarrow-up1955arrow-down16
arrow-up1949arrow-down1imageThe grand prizelemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 年前message-square137linkfedilink
minus-squarepeopleproblems@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down1·1 年前LLMs can’t actually do math…
minus-squareTragicNotCute@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 年前I just asked it and it says that it can. Checkmate.
minus-squarepotoooooooo ☑️@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 年前Yep, read it and weep, haters:
minus-squareTheOakTree@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 年前I find it to be very annoying to use for linear algebra, statistics, finance, and differential equations. Mostly because it often makes rounding errors or halucinates a number/process.
minus-squarepeopleproblems@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 年前Ask it if it can write instructions on how to multiply those numbers without a calculator
minus-squareTragicNotCute@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 年前It said “yeah”. Double checkmate.
minus-squareHeliumfart@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 年前Well that seemed to be perfect, doesn’t chat gpt outsource its math to Wolfram Alpha or something now?
minus-squareChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 年前Wolfram is Latin for tungsten so I’d trust it more than anything else
minus-squarepeopleproblems@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 年前That I don’t know. But regardless, the LLM can’t do it :P
minus-squareDaGeek247@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 年前Turns out it managed to do it right this time, so, maybe!
minus-squareTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·1 年前They can do it better than I can at 7 am. I just sit there and drool looking at my screen
LLMs can’t actually do math…
I just asked it and it says that it can.
Checkmate.
Yep, read it and weep, haters:
I find it to be very annoying to use for linear algebra, statistics, finance, and differential equations. Mostly because it often makes rounding errors or halucinates a number/process.
Ask it if it can write instructions on how to multiply those numbers without a calculator
It said “yeah”.
Double checkmate.
Damn yo
I can’t debate that
Well that seemed to be perfect, doesn’t chat gpt outsource its math to Wolfram Alpha or something now?
Wolfram is Latin for tungsten so I’d trust it more than anything else
That I don’t know. But regardless, the LLM can’t do it :P
Turns out it managed to do it right this time, so, maybe!
They can do it better than I can at 7 am. I just sit there and drool looking at my screen