Snip:
Speaking to Press TV, the regional source said the “absurd scenario” involving the hijacking of an Emirati aircraft bound for the occupied territories from the UAE, followed by its landing in Saudi Arabia, was carried out on Wednesday, three days after Netanyahu travelled to the United Arab Emirates accompanied by several senior military and intelligence officials.
The project, the informed source said, was discussed and finalized during the visit.
According to the source, during that visit, in addition to the UAE being tasked with playing a role in the Israeli regime’s regional projects, multilateral talks were held with officials from several other Arab countries to devise a false-flag operation and attribute it to Iran.
The source said the objective of the operation is to force Trump into a new quagmire and trigger a new round of war against Iran.
From Wikipedia: “Press TV (stylised as PRESSTV) is an Iranian state-owned news media organisation, owned by Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB), that broadcasts in the English and French languages. The 24-hour channel, which has headquarters in Tehran, was launched on 8 July 2007 and was intended to compete with western English language services.”
So basically TASS or RT, Iranian edition.
In other words a more reliable source than US or Israeli state department mouthpieces
Dang it that’s not an image I can save and then spam at people in the future.
I guess I could screenshot and crop it though.
Edit: Wait yes it is!
So what you’re saying is that reporting from PressTV is more reliable than the White House. Thanks for letting us know.
You know it takes a lot of arrogance to think that /not/ being state owned is some kind of credential and even more arrogance for thinking we didn’t already know press was Iranian. We knew that.
And considering how easy it would be for the Scary Bad Guy Regime you’re picturing in your head to just present totally false evidence through their news as official and irrifutable instead of just saying “hey an anonymous source has a tip, here’s some context” I don’t think you’re dunking on anyone anyways with that one. They’re not exactly trying to drop a bombshell story here.
Interesting you didn’t ivoke BBC in the comparison. Maybe think about that.
Ah yes, maybe we should instead check with the news that fires their anti-Israel journalists or are getting bought out by zionists instead; they’re American and privately owned, so by definition they’re reliable
Reliable even back before they were firing their anti-Israel journalists and getting bought out by zionists when they were claiming Iraq definitely 100% had WMDs
Also BBC. Can’t forget the limeys
The proper reply to Liberals
Yeah, we know.
So less trustworthy than the Guardian apparently? Who published a completely false article about Iran stoning a woman to death back in 2010 that the author now admits was completely fabricated? That it’s still up on their website? The one that the rest of the international bourgeois press followed with? Ok.