• DagwoodIII@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    ‘No Business Which Depends for Existence on Paying Less Than Living Wages to Its Workers Has Any Right to Continue in This Country’

    Franklin D. Roosevelt.

  • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Minimum wage in the UK is getting close to the living wage. The living wage foundation calculate what the a living wage actually is, some employers use that to base the minimum rate they will pay staff instead of the minimum wage. Its voluntary so they don’t have to but employers that do usually like to show it off.

    Living wage £13.45 and minimum wage £12.71, there is also a separate £14.80 living wage for those in London.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    If a given company is paying workers so little that they need to go on government assistance, it should categorically disqualify that company from claiming any deductions whatsoever on their tax bill. Yes, any. No, no exceptions, in any category.

    Yes, that will be absolutely crippling to exploitative businesses, some of whom are very large. That is by design. This, if enacted, would be the “find out” part for those corps.

  • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    Discussion on the floor before the bill was passed (1938) clearly defined what a “minimum wage” would be… enough for a family of four to stay out of poverty (with one parent at home). It was supposed to be raised to that minimum in perpetuity.

    You could “flip hamburgers” and feed your wife and two kids.

    Now, the minimum wage isn’t enough to feed yourself, let alone a pet. Unless that pet is a rat. One of the many infesting your squalid apartment. Which is actually a shed in someone’s back yard.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 days ago

    Every ten years like clockwork, for about the last one hundred years, we complain about the fact that minimum wage is not enough to live on. Every ten years, like clockwork, nothing changes and the rich get richer. Is anything “for the people” anymore?*

  • spacegoat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Imagine being a conservative, being on the wrong side of history and virtually every issue, and never catching a clue. Pathetic

  • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    If the worker cannot live on the wages they are payed, that means that someone else has to cover the rest.

    That someone else is often the government (e.g. Walmart employees needing food stamps)

    These companies are getting labor subsidized by taxpayer money.

  • veryblandusername@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is one of those “I’m 16 and this is deep” moments.

    Like no shit. Also when the sun rises, the temperature does too!

  • Plurrbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Federal minimum wage is $7.50/hr and that change was going on 20 years ago… July 24th, 2009 to be exact…

  • bedwyr@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    No fucking shit. It has been like that since the 90s at least, 1971 was the genesis of the devolution/