I could not find a link to the study in the article, but I generally find Philip Chard’s work to be high quality and insightful having read his columns for many years now, so I trust the information

  • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 days ago

    I had one of those marriages where it was more roommates than mates. Just very blah. No infidelity, no abuse, but… nothing super great about it either. It took me two years of working up the nerve (and secretly hoping my partner would actually listen and put forth effort), before I ended things. In the end, I admit, that the comfort and stability of the relationship had me thinking of going straight back to her, but we had a fundamental difference that stopped it; I wanted kids, or at least to adopt if we had the means, and she absolutely didn’t. Yes, we discussed it before we got married, but she said she’d “think about it,” and I think we both thought the other would change their mind. I still love and care for her, but we weren’t meant to be married. It hurt so much to split, but was the right thing to do.

    My single life has been actually pretty great since then. I’ve gone to therapy, really focused on myself, really healed a lot. I’ve traveled, learned new things, tried new things, and never once felt ashamed about dancing. But dang, it’s hard dating again, especially when I’m 40 and still trying to find my perfect partner that also wants children. Dating apps means that everyone’s attention is constantly being pulled back to the prospect of finding someone better. Like, you meet, and everything is cool, but the dating app is like an unscratched lottery ticket, you never know what you’ll end up getting by going back in.

    So while my single life has been great, I’m ready for my forever partner, and I fear that maybe, I’m just not good enough to keep my perfect partners attention.

    • WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      I think your last sentence is a contradiction. Your perfect partner is someone you are good enough for. Anyone else just didn’t get caught by your filter.

      • AnarchistArtificer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, I think this is a good perspective.

        I also don’t think that dating apps are necessarily an unscratched lottery ticket either. I’m currently in a relationship with someone who I have clicked so well with that fairly early on, I just stopped bothering using dating apps, because it doesn’t feel worth the effort when I have someone — and this is even an open polyamorous relationship, so either of us are free to date other people if we wish. I had some relationships/dalliances where I did feel drawn to keep looking for other options, and I think that was signalling that I hadn’t found the right person for me.

        I can’t speak for whether the person I’m with currently is my “forever person” — because one of the things I like about our dynamic is that we encourage the other to grow and change in interesting ways, and it’s plausible that we could grow into people who are no longer quite so compatible. But right now, and for the foreseeable future, I seem to have found my perfect partner.

        Stick with it, OP. I may have gotten lucky, but I remember how demoralising the early dating was. Your perfect partner is someone who feels as lucky to have found you as you feel for having found them. You deserve that kind of relationship, and what’s more, your future kids deserve that too. It sounds like you’re focussing on the right things though in focussing on building yourself up. That leads me to believe that you’ll be successful, if you keep heart.

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah. After my last relationship ended, I told myself if my only value was for sex/ego booster/doing all the chores and half the bills, at least if I’m on my own, I come and go as I please, with whom I please or alone without someone else ruining it, and while I may not be as financially comfortable, my physical and emotional health are really, really worth it. I wouldn’t mind a partner, but I’m not interested in doing all the emotional and household work on top of being captive with no pleasure money.

  • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    Marriage is a social construct like any other.

    When people started farming they started caring about owning land and passing it down to the next generation. The ‘nuclear family’ [mommy/daddy/kiddos] was a viable economic unit.

    On the other hand, you can’t just snap your fingers and come up with a replacement overnight.

  • DougPiranha42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    Better off starving or eating? Study indicates that unless one’s food is what nutritionists call nontoxic, one is physically better off starving.

    • Elting@multiverse.soulism.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Ironically it is basically a perquisite to be happy on your own before you can find a good relationship. I have known a lot of couples and only a few of them seemed happier together than I am single. If you are miserable then getting involved with someone will just spread your misery, not reduce it.

    • tacosanonymous@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      Not quite the same but I could see a an argument for “if you can’t be with the one you love, love the one you’re with.” Still, not being in a relationship is better than being in a bad one and I’m sure the exact threshold varies from person to person.