• artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    272
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Almost nobody is willing to buy one

    repairability enthusiasts have bought Framework laptops in the hundreds of thousands

    Pick a lane there, XDA…

    • VoteNixon2016@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      86
      ·
      19 hours ago

      They even mention how the point is to buy the whole laptop once and then upgrade or repair it, instead of buying an entirely new laptop. Of course they’re selling fewer laptops than anyone making mediocre netbooks

    • placebo@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Their argument is that only enthusiasts want these laptops, but an average customer doesn’t care about them.

      • Taasz/Woof@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Comes from the corporate mindset where only growth is good. Just existing as a company that’s makes stuff for a small group of people is somehow ‘incorrect’ to these crazy people.

      • spectrums_coherence@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        And I don’t see why that is a problem. If a company is doing good thing and sustaining itself, I don’t see why they will need to be the next dell, hp, or lenovo. That feels like the toxicity of “endless growth” in the capitalistic view of the world.

        Not to mention in most of the place I go to, these are the most popular laptops only behind macbooks. In many situations, they are even more popular than macbooks.

        • GalacticRobot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I have never seen a Framework in the wild, however I applaud their approach, but even when taking repair costs in consideration, Frameworks are more expensive than simply upgrading to a newer laptop and using the old laptop for some other purpose. I can’t imagine with the rampocalypse that they easily survive, but I hope they do, I wish other manufacturers would make repair a higher priority.

          • artyom@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Frameworks are more expensive than simply upgrading to a newer laptop

            They’re absolutely not.

            can’t imagine with the rampocalypse that they easily survive

            Being that you can and have been able to buy them without RAM or storage, I’d say they’re better-positioned than anyone.

          • runner_g@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            17 hours ago

            My anecdotal experience - my Asus gaming laptop died about 6 months ago. with a lot of trouble shooting, I determined it was most likely the mobo. I decided to go with a framework, and was able to bring over my hard drive and ram, saving me like $400.

              • runner_g@piefed.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                13 hours ago

                Getting the framework driver’s was painful. I needed to download them over wifi, but wifi wasn’t working because it needed the driver. okay, download on another computer and install via USB, nope. USB drivers aren’t working either. I ended up spotting my hard drive into my desktop, downloading the drivers that way, and then moving it back to the framework laptop to install.

                • spectrums_coherence@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  If you have a desktop with internet connection, maybe a USB stick would suffice?

                  There is also USB tethering from a phone that could work.

                  I am not defending framework. They should try to do better (maybe windows is the bottleneck? not sure). Just offering solutions to people who might encounter this problem later.

          • spectrums_coherence@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            I would like to offer a slightly different perspective: I believe framework is uniquely positioned to survive the ram apocalypse (at least respect to their scale).

            In the sense that, framework user can keep purchasing and upgrading components, like battery, screen, speaker, hinge, expansion card, without needing to worry about ram prices, and framework can profit from these component without needing to subsidize ram prices.

            That being said, as a smaller company, they certainly don’t have the same amount of bargaining power on ram as most big players, and the launch of LPCAM2 is a bit risky, since that pervents people from purchasing new ram/board/laptops given the current ram prices.

            • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              16 hours ago

              Does a new generation mobo/chip combination generally still support the older generation of RAM?

              • spectrums_coherence@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 hours ago

                Nope, not on intel core ultra 3 unfortunately (unless you have LPCAMM2 lying around, which is unlikely), that is the risky part I mentioned in the end.

                • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  that is the risky part I mentioned in the end.

                  That’s what I get for only reading 2/3 of your comment before responding.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Why does everything need to cater to the average consumer? The average consumer is a fucking idiot, especially when it comes to technology. They don’t need to sell to everyone, they just need to sell enough to keep their company running and their people paid.

        • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I feel this way about spicy things. Everything “hot” is just hot to the average schmuck from the Midwest. Anything spicier than that gets dumbed down to become that (like taco bell Diablo sauce) or becomes hard to find.

          I really enjoyed when that Buldak 2x spicy chicken raman “challenge” became a thing, because that’s some great tasting raman and more in line with the normal amount of spicy I like to eat. Now I’m back to having to just order it online again.

            • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              I totally have some! But man, it’s kind of pricey for what it is. Not saying I don’t spend more on most of the hot sauces I buy, but still.

          • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            As an average schmuck from the Midwest. I’m sorry our weak tastebuds are fucking up your options.

            • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              It’s not your fault. The taco bell one really tucked me off, though. The first summer it was out was a limited time thing. It was actually a bit spicy. A lot more spicy than anything else a fast food chain had.

              But then when they brought it back permanently it wasn’t half as spicy as it was. Taco Bell has like 5 fucking bland ass sauces now, and three of them taste about the same. What’s the damned point? FU taco bell. You could have left me with at least one option besides all your ketchup with tobacco sauce mixed in. No wonder I’ve only been there like 4 times in the last year.

              • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Yeah, I remember thinking the diablo one was pretty hot for my taste but now it’s the one I go with. I didn’t know they changed it, I thought I might have developed some tolerance lol. It’s gotten way too expensive for what it is anyway.

                • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  Yeah. They buy cheaper stuff, and charge more for it. I can’t stand the taste of their trash burrito shells they went to. Then, they charge twice as much for just a bean burrito and give you half the filling, even though it’s just super cheap refried beans.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        It may be, but that doesn’t resemble what they said. Presumably that is a less clickbaity headline.

    • akilou@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Well, what is hundreds of thousands as a percentage of the overall market? Like if they sold hundreds of thousands of grains of rice, that’s “almost nothing” compared to the rest of the rice that got sold

      • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        “Most of the market” includes the segments of commercial support contracts for office laptops which Framework doesn’t even target. Then you have the next biggest which is "go to Costco/Walmary/bestbuy and get what is on sale. So Framework simply cannot be a majority brand without those.

        Among the remaining segment, e.g., developers that get to shop around and buy whatever they want? Its fairly popular.

        • nullify3112@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I don’t understand what you mean in your first point. There are clear pathways for companies and schools to buy in bulk on the framework website. Not saying that FW is successful in that way but it is there.

          I agree on your second point but would tie it to marketing. Having your laptop on sale at Costco is a marketing strategy, which for better or for worse, FW doesn’t do right now (and probably doesn’t have the ability to do)

        • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          In many contexts it is.

          Windows Phone sold millions of phones, yet it was almost nobody in terms of the market, and as such basically no app developers supported it.

        • GalacticRobot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I mean, Dell is the #3 in laptop sales and sells roughly 30 million laptops per year. So yeah, Framework is roughly 0% of market share. I know this is a very tech enthusiast heavy website, but there are certain realities that people should face. It’s like saying Nothing Phone is going to remotely compete with Apple. It’s not a fair or valid comparison in the first place. I think a more fair comparison for Framework (beyond what they are hoping to achieve) would be with a small system builder like System 76, XMG or the likes.

          • artyom@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            17 hours ago

            This is not a reality anyone needs to “face”, it’s just an intentionally poor choice of words.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Advertising is expensive as hell. Probably not a huge budget. The products kinda sell themselves in the right circles.